RBNZ launched a consultation on the framework for identifying the domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs). The consultation paper seeks views on the proposed indicator-based approach for identifying D-SIBs. The consultation closes on May 31, 2019.
As per the proposed new capital adequacy proposals of RBNZ, D-SIBs would be subject to a capital surcharge vis-à-vis smaller banks. The method proposed for identifying D-SIBs in this consultation paper aligns with international best practice as recommended by the Basel Committee. The method uses an indicator-based approach across four dimensions: size, interconnectedness, substitutability, and complexity of banks. The banking supervision handbook BS 1 defines “systemically important banks” as banks with external liabilities exceeding NZD 15 billion. Once a bank exceeds this threshold, it has to incorporate this framework locally. After the consultation has closed, RBNZ will publish the submissions it has received, a summary of the feedback, further impact analysis, and its decision on how to proceed with the proposed D-SIB framework.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, New Zealand, Banking, D-SIBs, Regulatory Capital, Basel III, Systemic Risk, RBNZ
Previous ArticleOJK and Korea Agree to Strengthen Cooperation in Financial Services
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2021/1527 with regard to the regulatory technical standards for the contractual recognition of write down and conversion powers.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to provide guidance to authorized deposit-taking institutions on the interpretation of APS 120, the prudential standard on securitization.
The Single Resolution Board (SRB) published a Communication on the application of regulatory technical standard provisions on prior permission for reducing eligible liabilities instruments as of January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to clarify the regulatory capital treatment of investments in the overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on the guidelines specifying the criteria to assess the exceptional cases when institutions exceed the large exposure limits and the time and measures needed for institutions to return to compliance.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued the policy statement PS20/21, which contains final rules for the application of existing consolidated prudential requirements to financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) revised the guidelines on stress tests to be conducted by the national deposit guarantee schemes under the Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive (DGSD).
The European Commission (EC) announced that Nordea Bank has signed a guarantee agreement with the European Investment Bank (EIB) Group to support the sustainable transformation of businesses in the Nordics.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) issued a circular, for all authorized institutions, to confirm its support of an information note that sets out various options available in the loan market for replacing USD LIBOR with the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR).
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a new "Problem Bank Supervision" booklet of the Comptroller's Handbook. The booklet covers information on timely identification and rehabilitation of problem banks and their advanced supervision, enforcement, and resolution when conditions warrant.