GLEIF Issues Monthly Global LEI Data Quality Report for March 2019
GLEIF published the monthly Global Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) data quality report, which analyzes the overall data quality in the Global LEI System. Additionally, GLEIF has updated the list of current and proposed regulatory activities, including the use of LEI. It is the prerogative of the authorities acting in individual jurisdictions to mandate the use of LEIs.
The assessment performed on March 31, 2019 shows that the LEI Total Data Quality Score remains stable above 99%. The analysis of distinct quality maturity levels met by the LEI issuers demonstrates that the percentage of LEI issuers that achieve required data quality (69%) remains essentially unchanged compared to the previous reporting period. The global LEI data quality report this month covers the following factors:
- The LEI Total Data Quality Score for the reporting period
- Progress achieved on the continuous optimization of data quality within the Global LEI System, based on the LEI Total Data Quality Score
- The Total Data Quality Score per country achieved in the reporting period
- Results of GLEIF checks of the LEI data records against implemented quality criteria—that is, the percentage of records that successfully passed the tests
- The percentage of LEI data records that meet the requirements of distinct quality maturity levels
- Information on "Level 2" data, duplicates, and challenges for the reporting period
- The section "Top 5 Failing Checks" identifying the data quality checks performed by GLEIF that trigger the highest number of LEI records that fail these checks
Related Links
Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Securities, LEI, GLEIS, Data Quality, LEI Adoption, GLEIF
Previous Article
PRA Outlines Approach to Reporting and Disclosures Amid COVID-19Related Articles
FINMA Approves Merger of Credit Suisse and UBS
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has approved the takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS.
BOE Sets Out Its Thinking on Regulatory Capital and Climate Risks
The Bank of England (BOE) published a working paper that aims to understand the climate-related disclosures of UK financial institutions.
OSFI Finalizes on Climate Risk Guideline, Issues Other Updates
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is seeking comments, until May 31, 2023, on the draft guideline on culture and behavior risk, with final guideline expected by the end of 2023.
APRA Assesses Macro-Prudential Policy Settings, Issues Other Updates
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published an information paper that assesses its macro-prudential policy settings aimed at promoting stability at a systemic level.
BIS Paper Examines Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Lending
BIS issued a paper that investigates the effect of the greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions of firms on bank loans using bank–firm matched data of Japanese listed firms from 2006 to 2018.
HMT Mulls Alignment of Ring-Fencing and Resolution Regimes for Banks
The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks.
MFSA Sets Out Supervisory Priorities, Issues Reporting Updates
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) outlined its supervisory priorities for 2023
German Regulators Issue Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks
Deutsche Bundesbank published the nationally deactivated validation rules for the German Commercial Code (HGB) users on the taxonomy 3.2, which became valid from December 31, 2022
BCBS Report Examines Impact of Basel III Framework for Banks
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on the June 30, 2022 data.
PRA Consults on Prudential Rules for "Simpler-Regime" Firms
Among the recent regulatory updates from UK authorities, a key development is the first-phase consultation, from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), on simplifications to the prudential framework that would apply to the simpler-regime firms.
