GLEIF published the monthly Global Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) data quality report, which analyzes the overall data quality in the Global LEI System. Additionally, GLEIF has updated the list of current and proposed regulatory activities, including the use of LEI. It is the prerogative of the authorities acting in individual jurisdictions to mandate the use of LEIs.
The assessment performed on March 31, 2019 shows that the LEI Total Data Quality Score remains stable above 99%. The analysis of distinct quality maturity levels met by the LEI issuers demonstrates that the percentage of LEI issuers that achieve required data quality (69%) remains essentially unchanged compared to the previous reporting period. The global LEI data quality report this month covers the following factors:
- The LEI Total Data Quality Score for the reporting period
- Progress achieved on the continuous optimization of data quality within the Global LEI System, based on the LEI Total Data Quality Score
- The Total Data Quality Score per country achieved in the reporting period
- Results of GLEIF checks of the LEI data records against implemented quality criteria—that is, the percentage of records that successfully passed the tests
- The percentage of LEI data records that meet the requirements of distinct quality maturity levels
- Information on "Level 2" data, duplicates, and challenges for the reporting period
- The section "Top 5 Failing Checks" identifying the data quality checks performed by GLEIF that trigger the highest number of LEI records that fail these checks
Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Securities, LEI, GLEIS, Data Quality, LEI Adoption, GLEIF
PRA, via the consultation paper CP12/20, proposed changes to its rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement certain elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
EIOPA published the financial stability report that provides detailed quantitative and qualitative assessment of the key risks identified for the insurance and occupational pensions sectors in the European Economic Area.
EBA published its risk dashboard for the first quarter of 2020 together with the results of the risk assessment questionnaire.
EBA announced that the next stress testing exercise is expected to be launched at the end of January 2021 and its results are to be published at the end of July 2021.
PRA published the consultation paper CP11/20 that sets out its expectations and guidance related to auditors’ work on the matching adjustment under Solvency II.
MAS published a statement guidance on dividend distribution by banks.
APRA updated its capital management guidance for banks, particularly easing restrictions around paying dividends as institutions continue to manage the disruption caused by COVID-19 pandemic.
FSB published a report that reviews the progress on data collection for macro-prudential analysis and the availability and use of macro-prudential tools in Germany.
EBA issued a statement reminding financial institutions that the transition period between EU and UK will expire on December 31, 2020; this will end the possibility for the UK-based financial institutions to offer financial services to EU customers on a cross-border basis via passporting.
SRB published guidance on operational continuity in resolution and financial market infrastructure (FMI) contingency plans.