Bundesbank updated the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system. The requirements apply to all credit institutions within the meaning of the Capital Requirement Regulation.
The working version V 4.0 is based on the knowledge as of March 2020 and
- changes resulting from the latest taxonomy version 2.9 are marked in red letters and in column A with an "x" and highlighted in color
- changes due to the previous taxonomy versions 2.8 and 2.7 are marked in blue or green letters and in column A with an "x", but are not highlighted in color
- spreadsheets in which there have been changes to the previous version are highlighted in yellow
ECB has formulated data quality requirements for uniform supervision in the Single Supervisory Mechanism. These requirements are being checked against five criteria: punctuality, completeness, correctness and consistency, continuity, and plausibility. The completeness check is based on the existence of all modules and forms to be submitted. The completeness of a report depends on factors specific to the institution and is, therefore, assessed on an individual basis. In addition to the checks at the module and form levels, completeness is also checked at the data point level.
Related Links (in German)
Keywords: Europe, Germany, Banking, SSM, Reporting, COREP, FINREP, Derivation Rules, CRR, Bundesbank
Previous ArticleFCA and PRA to Move to New Data Collection Platform as Planned
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) tool updates for this month include answers to 10 questions.
The European Commission, or EC, finalized the Implementing Regulation 2021/2017 with respect to the benchmark portfolios, reporting templates, and reporting instructions for the supervisory benchmarking of internal approaches for calculating own funds requirements.
The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.
The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.