BoM recently revised a couple of guideline documents for banks and signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with BSP, the central bank of Philippines. The MOU, which took effect on March 01, 2021, covers cooperation in the development of banking and payment systems, fintech, cybersecurity, and sustainable central banking. One of the published guidelines addresses revisions to BoM's approach to the recognition process of External Credit Assessment Institutions (ECAIs) and the use of eligible ECAIs by banks, including as part of the standardized approach to credit risk; the revised guideline shall become effective as from April 01, 2021. The other revised guideline addresses certain requirements that banks would need to be follow in respect of their cross-border exposure.
This guideline on recognition and use of ECAIs covers the recognition of ECAIs, the principles for consistent use of credit assessments of ECAIs, and the use of Export Credit Agencies (ECAs). The guideline sets out minimum requirements for each of the six eligibility criteria for recognition of ECAIs, including objectivity, independence, international access/transparency, disclosure, resources, and credibility. Only the credit assessments of eligible ECAIs shall qualify for the standardized approach to credit risk. BoM can use both direct and indirect recognition methods for ECAIs. An application to recognize an ECAI may be initiated by a bank intending to use its ratings under the standardized approach to credit risk, or by an ECAI itself. The BoM guideline on standardized approach to credit risk permits banks to use consensus country risk scores of ECAs to determine risk-weights for claims on sovereigns, in cases where countries are not rated by eligible ECAIs. BoM has not set up a recognition process for ECAs equivalent to the one required for ECAIs. However, ECAs must publish their consensus country risk scores and subscribe to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)-agreed methodology, for these to qualify for calculating capital requirements under the standardized approach to credit risk.
The guideline on cross-border exposure provides a risk-based management framework to mitigate the key cross-border banking risks. BoM has issued several guidelines in respect of the identification, measurement, management, and mitigation of credit risk. These include the guideline on country risk management, the guideline on credit risk management, and the guideline on credit concentration risk. The guideline on cross-border exposure supplements these existing guidelines and provides a set of additional minimum standards that would need to be followed by banks in respect of their cross-border exposure. With respect to regulatory reporting, the guideline specifies that a bank shall immediately inform BoM when the bank is affected by a material increase in underlying risks such as credit, legal, or reputational risks in connection with its cross-border exposure or is approached by foreign authorities regarding such matters. BoM stipulates that banks shall fully implement the requirements of this guideline within three months from its effective date.
Keywords: Middle East and Africa, Mauritius, Banking, Credit Risk, Standardized Approach, Credit Ratings, ECAIs, Regulatory Capital, Basel, Cross-Border Exposures, Basel, BoM
Previous ArticleBOG Becomes Member of Basel Consultative Group
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2021/1527 with regard to the regulatory technical standards for the contractual recognition of write down and conversion powers.
In a response to the questions posed by a member of the European Parliament, the President Christine Lagarde highlighted the commitment of the European Central Bank (ECB) to an ambitious climate-related action plan along with a roadmap, which was published in July 2021.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to provide guidance to authorized deposit-taking institutions on the interpretation of APS 120, the prudential standard on securitization.
The Single Resolution Board (SRB) published a Communication on the application of regulatory technical standard provisions on prior permission for reducing eligible liabilities instruments as of January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to clarify the regulatory capital treatment of investments in the overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on the guidelines specifying the criteria to assess the exceptional cases when institutions exceed the large exposure limits and the time and measures needed for institutions to return to compliance.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued the policy statement PS20/21, which contains final rules for the application of existing consolidated prudential requirements to financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) revised the guidelines on stress tests to be conducted by the national deposit guarantee schemes under the Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive (DGSD).
The European Commission (EC) announced that Nordea Bank has signed a guarantee agreement with the European Investment Bank (EIB) Group to support the sustainable transformation of businesses in the Nordics.
The French Prudential Control and Resolution Authority (ACPR) published the corrective version of the RUBA taxonomy Version 1.0.1, which will come into force from the decree of January 31, 2022.