General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
September 25, 2017

Dr. Andreas Dombret of the Deutsche Bundesbank spoke about the German proposal on regulatory proportionality, at the strategy conference of the Rhineland Savings Banks and Giro Association on August 29, 2017. The speech focused on regulatory proportionality for small banks and savings banks with a regional footprint and examined how the regulatory landscape might evolve for these banks.

He examined the chronology of actions taken and the ways explored toward embedding the principle of proportionality more deeply within the regulatory and supervisory frameworks. He also discussed the EC proposals for strengthening proportionality as part of the general overhaul of EU banking regulation, which is still an ongoing process. “These proposals would make major changes to the small print, and I am certain that we will be able to roll out a number of meaningful initial improvements. That said, the proposals don't go far enough—which is why we thought ahead.” To this end, he highlighted that a German discussion paper was put before the competent expert group of the EC in June this year. The paper proposes two paths toward greater proportionality and discusses the pros and cons of each: one path involves adjusting the existing regulatory framework and the second path involves creating a dedicated regulatory framework for small institutions (small banking box).

According to Dr. Dombret, the German proposal adopts a three-tiered approach to greater proportionality. In this proposal, systematically important institutions with the potential to pose systemic risk will be subject to Basel III in full while medium-sized institutions will be provided with selective relief. A stand-alone supervisory regime, known as small banking box, has been proposed for the small, less complex institutions. The paper then proposes a classification criteria for categorizing the institutions into these three tiers. It proposes no proportionality for risk-based capital ratios, leverage ratio, and liquidity coverage ratio, emphasizing “that a lot of rules are not up for debate” and “that the very purpose of our joint proposal is to avoid unnecessarily high amounts of paperwork.” It is to be noted that this debate is now at the European level and the government, supervisors, and German banking industry unanimously hold a joint position. He concludes that “we must present a united German front. If we in Germany do not manage to all stand behind the small banking box concept, we will have a hard job convincing other European countries.


Related Link: Speech

Keywords: Europe, EU, Germany, Proportionality, Basel III, Small Banking Box, Bundesbank, BIS

Related Insights

BCBS Finalizes Market Risk Capital Framework and Work Program for 2019

BCBS published the final framework for market risk capital requirements and its work program for 2019. Also published was an explanatory note to provide a non-technical description of the overall market risk framework, the changes that have been incorporated into in this version of the framework and impact of the framework.

January 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: First Update for January 2019

EBA published answers to 13 questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

January 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

PRA Proposes to Amend Supervisory Statement on Credit Risk Mitigation

PRA published the consultation paper CP1/19 that is proposing changes to the supervisory statement (SS17/13) on credit risk mitigation.

January 10, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

FASB Issues Q&A on Estimating Credit Loss Reserves

FASB issued a question-and-answer (Q&A) document that addresses particular issues related to the weighted average remaining maturity (WARM) method for estimating the allowance for credit losses.

January 10, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

FED Updates Reporting and Supplemental Instructions for Form FR Y-9C

FED published the updated reporting instructions and supplemental instructions for the FR Y-9C reporting form. The reporting frequency for FR Y-9C is quarterly, as of the last calendar day of the quarter.

January 09, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

ESMA RTS on Supervisory Cooperation Under Securitization Regulation

ESMA issued the final regulatory technical standards (RTS) for cooperation between competent authorities and ESAs under the Securitization Regulation (2017/2402).

January 08, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

PRA Updates Policy on Liquidity Reporting Under FSA047/048 and PRA110

PRA published the policy statement PS1/19 that provides feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP22/18 titled "Liquidity reporting: FSA047 and FSA048" and the proposal in CP16/18, which intended to correct the level of consolidation of the PRA110 reporting requirements.

January 08, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

FED Proposes to Amend Company-Run Stress Testing Requirements

FED proposed to modify company-run stress testing requirements to conform with the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection (EGRRCP) Act.

January 08, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

OCC Revises Asset Thresholds for Small Banks and Savings Associations

OCC published in the Federal Register revisions to the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) regulations that became effective January 01, 2019.

January 07, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

ESAs Publish Joint Report on Regulatory Sandboxes and Innovation Hubs

ESAs published a joint report providing a comparative analysis of the innovation facilitators (that is, regulatory sandboxes and innovation hubs) established to date within the EU.

January 07, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2453