Danièle Nouy, Chair of the ECB Supervisory Board, spoke at the 33rd SUERF Colloquium in Helsinki. She discussed the regulatory arbitrage challenges facing regulators and supervisors and highlighted the importance of international supervisory cooperation to deal with this issue.
ECB’s ongoing targeted review of internal models at over 60 banks, including all eight of the globally significant banks supervised in the euro area, is an important step toward dealing with the challenge of regulatory arbitrage. Supervisors need to scrutinize what bankers do and examine individual transactions to see whether they might be an attempt to game the rules. Ms. Nouy discusses three types of regulatory arbitrage and how it can be dealt with:
Cross-Jurisdiction Arbitrage, which exploits differences in rules for banks from one country to another. In Europe, cross-jurisdiction arbitrage has become even more of an issue in the context of Brexit. Thus, harmonization of rules is a powerful tool when it comes to preventing cross-jurisdiction arbitrage. Transposing the Basel and European rules into national law is important in this context, thus making a case for further harmonizing the European rulebook. To that end, we should rely less on EU directives and more on EU regulations, which are directly applicable in all member states.
Cross-Framework Arbitrage, which arises because some parts of the financial sector, such as the shadow banking sector, are less regulated than the highly regulated banking sector. If banks shift exposures to shadow banks, they become vulnerable to what is known as “step-in risk,” which must be addressed. With this in mind, BCBS has made step-in risk part of its official work program and is working on guidelines for banks and supervisors. These guidelines contain a number of criteria that will help to assess step-in risks for individual banks and they propose measures aimed at helping banks to deal with such risks. The guidelines will not contain automatic Pillar 1 capital or liquidity add-ons. Instead, they will provide a list of potential measures that leverage existing tools. It will be up to the banks to choose the most appropriate measures, while supervisors will check and challenge the choices banks make.
Intra-Framework Arbitrage, in which rather than trying to exploit differences between two or more sets of rules, banks try to exploit loopholes within a single set of rules. Here, ECB is more concerned with closing loopholes rather than harmonizing rules and preventing the spillover of risks. One solution could be to change the rules in such a way that loopholes are closed. However, for this to be effective, regulators would first have to identify every loophole, which we all know is impossible. So it makes sense to also apply tools that have a broader and more preventive effect: such measures are already being implemented. The rules nowadays focus on more than one dimension. "Thanks to Basel III, banks around the world now face multiple constraints: the risk-weighted capital ratio has been supplemented by a leverage ratio and liquidity ratios. These constraints reinforce each other, which makes it much more difficult for banks to game them."
Related Link: Speech
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Regulatory Arbitrage, Shadow Banking, Step-in Risk, Single Rulebook, ECB
Previous ArticleFSB Issues List of G-SIBs for 2017
ESAs (EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA) published the first joint report that assesses risks in the financial sector since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
APRA has concluded its review of the comprehensive plans of authorized deposit-taking institutions for the assessment and management of loans with repayment deferrals.
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
EBA has decided to phase out the guidelines on legislative and non-legislative moratoria of loan repayments, in accordance with the earlier specified end of September deadline.
EC adopted a decision determining, for a limited period of time, that the regulatory framework applicable to central counterparties, or CCPs, in the UK and Northern Ireland is equivalent to the requirements laid down in the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR or Regulation 648/2012).
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.