General Information & Client Services
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
September 15, 2017

Danièle Nouy, Chair of the ECB Supervisory Board, spoke at the 33rd SUERF Colloquium in Helsinki. She discussed the regulatory arbitrage challenges facing regulators and supervisors and highlighted the importance of international supervisory cooperation to deal with this issue.

ECB’s ongoing targeted review of internal models at over 60 banks, including all eight of the globally significant banks supervised in the euro area, is an important step toward dealing with the challenge of regulatory arbitrage. Supervisors need to scrutinize what bankers do and examine individual transactions to see whether they might be an attempt to game the rules. Ms. Nouy discusses three types of regulatory arbitrage and how it can be dealt with:

Cross-Jurisdiction Arbitrage, which exploits differences in rules for banks from one country to another. In Europe, cross-jurisdiction arbitrage has become even more of an issue in the context of Brexit. Thus, harmonization of rules is a powerful tool when it comes to preventing cross-jurisdiction arbitrage. Transposing the Basel and European rules into national law is important in this context, thus making a case for further harmonizing the European rulebook. To that end, we should rely less on EU directives and more on EU regulations, which are directly applicable in all member states.

Cross-Framework Arbitrage, which arises because some parts of the financial sector, such as the shadow banking sector, are less regulated than the highly regulated banking sector. If banks shift exposures to shadow banks, they become vulnerable to what is known as “step-in risk,” which must be addressed. With this in mind, BCBS has made step-in risk part of its official work program and is working on guidelines for banks and supervisors. These guidelines contain a number of criteria that will help to assess step-in risks for individual banks and they propose measures aimed at helping banks to deal with such risks. The guidelines will not contain automatic Pillar 1 capital or liquidity add-ons. Instead, they will provide a list of potential measures that leverage existing tools. It will be up to the banks to choose the most appropriate measures, while supervisors will check and challenge the choices banks make.

Intra-Framework Arbitrage, in which rather than trying to exploit differences between two or more sets of rules, banks try to exploit loopholes within a single set of rules. Here, ECB is more concerned with closing loopholes rather than harmonizing rules and preventing the spillover of risks. One solution could be to change the rules in such a way that loopholes are closed. However, for this to be effective, regulators would first have to identify every loophole, which we all know is impossible. So it makes sense to also apply tools that have a broader and more preventive effect: such measures are already being implemented. The rules nowadays focus on more than one dimension. "Thanks to Basel III, banks around the world now face multiple constraints: the risk-weighted capital ratio has been supplemented by a leverage ratio and liquidity ratios. These constraints reinforce each other, which makes it much more difficult for banks to game them."


Related Link: Speech

Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Regulatory Arbitrage, Shadow Banking, Step-in Risk, Single Rulebook, ECB

Related Insights

IAIS Publishes Drafts of Revised ICP 8, ICP 15, ICP 16, and ICP 20

IAIS published the drafts of revised Insurance Core Principles on Public Disclosure (ICP 20), Investments (ICP 15), Enterprise Risk Management for Solvency Purposes (ICP 16), and Risk Management and Internal Controls (ICP 8), along with a revised draft of the glossary on enterprise risk management (ERM).

November 14, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

MAS Amends Notice 637 on Capital Adequacy Requirements in Singapore

MAS published the final, revised Notice 637 on the risk-based capital adequacy requirements in Singapore.

November 13, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

ESMA Updates Q&A on Implementation of CSD Regulation and MAR

ESMA updated questions and answers (Q&A) documents on the implementation of the Central Securities Depository (CSD) Regulation and Market Abuse Regulation (MAR).

November 12, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

FSB Finalizes and Publishes the Cyber Lexicon

FSB published a cyber lexicon, following the public consultation earlier this year.

November 12, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

SRB Updates Liability Data Reporting Template for 2019

SRB published version 2.7.1 of the Liability Data Reporting (LDR) Template.

November 12, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

ECB to Conduct Comprehensive Assessment of Six Bulgarian Banks

ECB will undertake a comprehensive assessment of six Bulgarian banks. The exercise, comprising an asset quality review and a stress test, follows Bulgaria’s submission of a request to establish close cooperation with ECB on July 18, 2018.

November 12, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

IMF Publishes Reports on the 2018 Article IV Consultation with Chile

IMF published its staff report and selected issues report under the 2018 Article IV consultation with Chile.

November 09, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

PRA Issues PS27/18 on Implementing the Extension of SM&CR to Insurers

PRA published the policy statement PS27/18, which provides feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP20/18, on implementing the extension of the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SM&CR) to insurers (Part 2).

November 09, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: First Update for November 2018

EBA published answers to seven questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

November 09, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News

FED Finalizes the Large Financial Institution Rating System

FED finalized the new supervisory rating system for Large Financial Institutions (LFIs), to better align with the current supervisory programs and practices for these firms.

November 09, 2018 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2204