General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
September 15, 2017

APRA published its submission to the Productivity Commission’s (PC) Inquiry into competition in the Australian financial system. The submission focuses on the role of APRA in the financial system, potential indicators of competitive dynamics within the industries APRA supervises, and APRA approach to balancing the objectives of financial safety and stability with considerations of competition and competitive neutrality. The PC’s Inquiry offers a valuable opportunity to reflect on efficiency and competition within Australia’s financial marketplace and potentially improve long-term consumer outcomes.

The prudential framework of APRA and its approach to supervision have been informed by the outworkings of the global financial crisis, which saw less financially strong competitors that were unable to maintain their viability through a period of adversity forced to leave the industry, leading to a more concentrated industry as a result. APRA recognizes that its prudential requirements may affect the relative position of competitors in regulated industries by imposing differential costs in some areas. Therefore, over the recent years, APRA has been developing its framework for more explicitly considering the effects of competition and efficiency in reviewing and updating the prudential framework. A number of recent and forthcoming prudential developments are likely to support increased competition in the financial sector, without unduly compromising the stability of the financial system.

 

Most APRA-regulated industry sectors display relatively high levels of concentration, with a small number of large entities holding a significant combined share of the market. However, industry concentration may not, on its own, be a comprehensive measure of the level of competition in individual markets for financial services products. There appear to be strong indicators of competition in certain financial services product markets (such as residential mortgages). Other segments, however, appear less competitive, given a reduced number of providers, which appears driven in part by a lack of expertise and systems capabilities, along with an aversion to higher risk activities by certain entities. This submission has been guided by the focus areas of the PC outlined in the consultation paper. In particular, APRA has focused on the issues associated with competition in the banking industry.

 

Related Link: Submission (PDF)

Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Competition, Productivity Commission Inquiry, Prudential Framework, APRA

Related Insights
News

BCBS Finds Liquidity Risk Management Principles Remain Fit for Purpose

BCBS completed a review of its 2008 Principles for sound liquidity risk management and supervision. The review confirmed that the principles remain fit for purpose.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

MAS Guidelines on Risk Mitigation Requirements for OTC Derivatives

MAS published guidelines on risk mitigation requirements for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives contracts.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

HKMA Urges Local Banks to Start Working on FRTB Implementation

HKMA announced that it plans to issue a consultation paper on the new market risk standard in the second quarter of 2019.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Finalizes Guidelines for High-Risk Exposures Under CRR

EBA published the final guidelines on the specification of types of exposures to be associated with high risk under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). The guidelines are intended to facilitate a higher degree of comparability in terms of the current practices in identifying high-risk exposures.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BoE Publishes the Schedule for Statistical Reporting for 2019

BoE published the updated schedule for statistical reporting for 2019. The reporting institutions use the online statistical data application (OSCA) to submit statistical data to BoE.

January 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Delays Final Direction on Reporting of Private Securitizations

PRA and FCA have delayed the issuance of final direction, including the final template, on reporting of private securitizations, from January 15, 2019 to the end of January 2019.

January 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

SNB Updates Forms on Supervisory Reporting for Banks

SNB published Version 1.7 of reporting forms (AUR_U, AUR_UEA, AUR_UES, AURH_U, AUR_K, AUR_KEA, and AURH_K) and the related documentation for supervisory reporting on an individual and consolidated basis.

January 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BCBS Finalizes Market Risk Capital Framework and Work Program for 2019

BCBS published the final framework for market risk capital requirements and its work program for 2019. Also published was an explanatory note to provide a non-technical description of the overall market risk framework, the changes that have been incorporated into in this version of the framework and impact of the framework.

January 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: First Update for January 2019

EBA published answers to 13 questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

January 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Proposes to Amend Supervisory Statement on Credit Risk Mitigation

PRA published the consultation paper CP1/19 that is proposing changes to the supervisory statement (SS17/13) on credit risk mitigation.

January 10, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2473