General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
September 15, 2017

APRA published its submission to the Productivity Commission’s (PC) Inquiry into competition in the Australian financial system. The submission focuses on the role of APRA in the financial system, potential indicators of competitive dynamics within the industries APRA supervises, and APRA approach to balancing the objectives of financial safety and stability with considerations of competition and competitive neutrality. The PC’s Inquiry offers a valuable opportunity to reflect on efficiency and competition within Australia’s financial marketplace and potentially improve long-term consumer outcomes.

The prudential framework of APRA and its approach to supervision have been informed by the outworkings of the global financial crisis, which saw less financially strong competitors that were unable to maintain their viability through a period of adversity forced to leave the industry, leading to a more concentrated industry as a result. APRA recognizes that its prudential requirements may affect the relative position of competitors in regulated industries by imposing differential costs in some areas. Therefore, over the recent years, APRA has been developing its framework for more explicitly considering the effects of competition and efficiency in reviewing and updating the prudential framework. A number of recent and forthcoming prudential developments are likely to support increased competition in the financial sector, without unduly compromising the stability of the financial system.

 

Most APRA-regulated industry sectors display relatively high levels of concentration, with a small number of large entities holding a significant combined share of the market. However, industry concentration may not, on its own, be a comprehensive measure of the level of competition in individual markets for financial services products. There appear to be strong indicators of competition in certain financial services product markets (such as residential mortgages). Other segments, however, appear less competitive, given a reduced number of providers, which appears driven in part by a lack of expertise and systems capabilities, along with an aversion to higher risk activities by certain entities. This submission has been guided by the focus areas of the PC outlined in the consultation paper. In particular, APRA has focused on the issues associated with competition in the banking industry.

 

Related Link: Submission (PDF)

Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Competition, Productivity Commission Inquiry, Prudential Framework, APRA

Related Articles
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Fourth Update for March 2019

EBA published answers to five questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

March 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

ECB Updates Validation Checks and List of Identifiers Under AnaCredit

ECB updated the AnaCredit validation checks (Version 1.4) and the list of national identifiers (version 2.4) for AnaCredit reporting.

March 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BCBS Publishes Results of the Basel III Monitoring Exercise

BCBS published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on data as of June 30, 2018.

March 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA, FCA, and PRA Agree on MoU Template for Supervisory Cooperation

EBA, FCA, and PRA announced that they have agreed on a template for the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) that sets out the expectations for supervisory cooperation and information-sharing arrangements between UK and EU/European Economic Area national authorities.

March 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

HKMA Publishes CoP on Loss-Absorbing Capacity Requirements of Banks

HKMA issued, in relation to the Financial Institutions Resolution (Loss-Absorbing Capacity Requirements—Banking Sector) Rules (LAC Rules) a chapter of a code of practice (LAC CoP) under section 196 of the Financial Institutions Resolution Ordinance (FIRO).

March 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Publishes Reports Monitoring the Implementation of Basel III in EU

EBA published two reports measuring the impact of implementing the final Basel III reforms and monitoring the implementation of liquidity measures in EU.

March 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BCBS Publishes Results of Survey on Proportionality in Bank Regulation

BCBS published a report presenting the results of a survey conducted on proportionality practices in bank regulation and supervision.

March 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

US Agencies Adopt Interim Rule to Facilitate Transfers of Legacy Swaps

US Agencies (FCA, FDIC, FED, FHFA, and OCC) are adopting and inviting comments on an interim final rule.

March 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Updates List of Other Systemically Important Institutions in EU

EBA updated the 2018 list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU. The list also reflects the additional capital buffers that the relevant authorities have set for the identified O-SIIs.

March 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

HKMA Expects Banks to Manage Risks Related to Crypto-Asset Exposures

HKMA issued a statement announcing that it expects authorized institutions to take note of the BCBS statement on crypto-assets and its prudential expectations.

March 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2780