September 12, 2017

The U.S. GAO published a statement focusing on the subsectors and regulatory oversight in fintech. GAO, in April 2017, issued the first of a series of planned reports on the fintech industry that describes four commonly referenced subsectors of fintech and their regulatory oversight. This testimony summarizes the findings of that report and describes commonly referenced fintech subsectors; potential benefits and risks of these subsectors, including recent industry trends; and regulatory oversight of these subsectors. This statement is based on the April 2017 report on the fintech industry.

Fintech products and services offer various potential benefits, including increased access to financial services, lower costs, increased speed of service, and convenience. Fintech products and services also pose various potential risks, including data security and privacy risks, risks posed by the use of alternative data, risk of human error or confusion, and risk posed by incomplete or inaccurate data. Trends that have emerged across the fintech landscape include the creation of partnerships between traditional financial institutions and fintech firms, formation of hybrid services, and establishment of self-regulatory efforts.

 

Regulation of the commonly referenced subsectors depends on the extent to which the firms provide a regulated service and the format in which the services are provided, with responsibilities fragmented among multiple entities that have overlapping authorities. Federal oversight authorities that apply to regulated activities generally include risk management oversight related to services provided to federally regulated depository institutions, consumer protection oversight, and securities and derivatives markets oversight. Some agencies have taken a number of steps to understand and monitor the fintech industry. State licensing laws and oversight mechanisms, including consumer protection, vary by state. Officials from the Conference of State Bank Supervisors note that the states are working on developing tools that can facilitate compliance with state-by-state licensing mechanisms.

 

Related Links

GAO Statement (PDF)

Fintech Report, April 2017 (PDF)

Keywords: Americas, United States, Banking, Fintech, Regulatory Oversight, GAO

Related Articles
News

BoE, FCA, and MAS Announce Collaboration on Cyber Security

MAS and UK financial authorities (BoE and FCA) announced that they will work together to strengthen cyber security in their financial sectors.

June 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

CBIRC Advisory Committee Holds Meeting, Discusses Regulatory Issues

The first meeting of the International Advisory Committee (IAC) of CBIRC was held in Shanghai from June 11 to 12, 2019.

June 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

APRA Response to Proposal on Revisions to Capital Framework for Banks

APRA published a paper in response to the first round of consultation on proposed changes to the capital framework for authorized deposit-taking institutions.

June 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

APRA Finalizes Schedule on Scope of Variable Remuneration Under BEAR

APRA has released a response letter and the final wording of the schedule in relation to how the Banking Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR) applies to variable remuneration arrangements for medium and small authorized deposit-taking institutions (ADIs).

June 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EC Publishes Fourth Progress Report on Reduction of NPLs in EU Banks

EC published the fourth progress report on the reduction of non-performing loans (NPLs) in banks in EU.

June 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FASB Adds Taxonomy Entry Points in Relation to 2019 DEI Taxonomy

FASB has incorporated additional entry points for the 2019 GAAP [Generally Accepted Accounting Principles] Financial Reporting Taxonomy and the 2019 SEC Reporting Taxonomy, in connection with the issuance of the 2019 Document and Entity Information (DEI) Taxonomy by SEC.

June 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EC Publishes Draft Equivalence Decisions for Credit Rating Agencies

EC is requesting feedback on the draft implementing decisions on recognition of legal and supervisory systems of Hong Kong, Japan, Mexico, and U.S. as equivalent to the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on credit rating agencies.

June 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BaFin Consults on AFS Recommendation to Increase CCyB for Banks

BaFin is requesting feedback on increasing the domestic countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) to 0.25%, with effect from July 01, 2019, pursuant to Article 92(3) of Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).

June 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

MAS Revises Capital Adequacy Requirements for Banks in Singapore

MAS issued amendments to the Notice 637 on risk-based capital adequacy requirements for banks incorporated in Singapore.

June 10, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA on Modification by Consent of Definition of Capital Rules in CRR 2

PRA announced its decision to offer a modification by consent of the Rules 7.1 and 7.5 of the Definition of Capital Part of the PRA Rulebook.

June 10, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3238