In a letter to the chief financial officers of selected firms, the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has set out feedback after its review of the written auditor reports received in 2021. The thematic findings relate to the IFRS 9 expected credit loss accounting (ECL) and the benchmark reform. The letter also sets out how PRA intends to use next year’s round of written auditor reports to explore risks related to climate change. To this end, PRA has asked for auditor views on the robustness of a firm’s risk assessments with respect to the impact of climate change on balance sheets and the quality of the underlying data, models, and processes to support these assessments. This letter contains general feedback while PRA provides specific feedback to firms and their auditors through continuous assessment meetings; regular auditor–supervisor bilateral meetings; and trilateral meetings involving supervisors, auditors, and audit committee chair.
PRA findings on IFRS 9 ECLs relate to model risk, economic scenarios, and recovery strategies. The letter notes that model performance deteriorated in 2020, partly due to the unprecedented levels of government support distorting recent credit data and the limitations in firms’ approaches, including lack of granularity in reflecting sector-specific risks. It was also noted that firms and auditors increased their use of peer benchmarking and sensitivity analyses to inform challenge around the use of alternative economic assumptions. PRA believes it is essential for firms to develop capabilities to perform more comprehensive economic sensitivity analysis more quickly to inform robust governance and support comparable public disclosures. To make progress, firms need to define the capabilities they need and set realistic timelines for implementing them. PRA also noted that firms are making less progress in adopting high-quality practices for recovery strategies used in estimating loss given default (LGD) than in other areas of ECL. Limited use of adjustments to LGD to reflect the elevated risk that past experience may not necessarily be a good predictor of future recovery rates. Thus, PRA believes it will be important for firms to monitor the impact of the unwinding of government support to make realistic assumptions about recovery strategies for vulnerable sectors. As part of the next steps, PRA identified eight new areas where further mitigating actions are needed to ensure that firms recognize changes in credit risk in a timely way; these areas mainly relate to model risk management and capturing sectoral risks.
The findings on the benchmark reform indicate benchmark transition remains a significant operational and financial risk while liquidity is decisively shifting toward robust alternative risk-free rates. In the context of written auditor reporting, PRA reminds firms of the importance of managing and controlling the financial reporting aspects of the transition. To encourage firms to identify practical improvements that can be made in financial reporting, the letter sets out the PRA views on the most significant gaps between practices that auditors observed when they reported back to PRA vis-à-vis the high-quality practices shared with firms in 2020. PRA sees opportunities for greater use of independent review and challenge of risk-free rate transitioning plans. PRA found that some firms were still making extensive use of manual processes to capture and aggregate IBOR exposures for internal reporting and external financial reporting disclosures. Noting the short time remaining, PRA reiterated the benefits of automated systems being in place to support aggregate reporting of IBOR exposures and to ensure there is a single, standardized, and accurate view of both conversion progress to date and the scale of conversion activity remaining. Where further automation is not practical, it is important that reliance on manual processes be governed by formalized and documented controls over data extraction, validation, and aggregation.
Related Link: Letter
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, IFRS 9, Benchmark Reforms, ECL, Climate Change Risk, COVID-19, Reporting, ESG, Credit Risk, LGD, BoE
Previous ArticleMNB Issues Multiple Regulatory Updates in September 2021
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.