The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and seven central banks are taking forward their work on retail central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and analyzing policy options and practical implementation issues related to CBDCs. The seven central banks are Bank of Canada, Bank of England, Bank of Japan, European Central Bank, U.S. Federal Reserve Bank, Sveriges Riksbank, and Swiss National Bank. In this context, BIS published three reports that look into user needs and adoption, technological design options, and financial stability implications of retail or "general purpose" CBDCs. BIS and the central banks acknowledge the challenges associated with CBDCs while noting that operating CBDC ecosystem functions would be a significant undertaking and any outsourced functions would need to be carefully managed to deliver public trust in a CBDC system.
The first report on user needs and adoption explores how private-public collaboration and interoperability can be designed into CBDC systems to achieve this objective. Developing and running a CBDC system would be a major undertaking for any central bank. In particular, policies about privacy and access to payment data would be the key design elements to maintain public trust. The second report on design options focuses on how a CBDC could best serve people and businesses in a fast-changing technological landscape. Lessons from previous payment innovations compiled in the report show that success often requires harnessing network effects and not requiring users to obtain new devices. Nonetheless, there would not be a "one-size-fits-all" solution and CBDC adoption strategies would need to consider multiple perspectives through public consultations. The third report on financial stability implications outlines the possible impact of CBDC issuance on banking systems, in terms of intermediation capacity and overall resilience. Preliminary analysis highlights the importance of allowing the financial system time to adjust and the flexibility to use safeguards to influence CBDC adoption. Trusted and resilient money is a precondition for monetary and financial stability.
BIS and the central banks have also outlined the next steps in this collaboration, noting that this group will:
- Continue its practical policy and technical analysis, exploring the intersections between the three papers published and common areas of interest in CBDC research
- Continue to contribute to other complementary international work on CBDCs and the future of payments, including the G7 Digital Payments stream, the G20 cross-border payments roadmap, the CPMI Future of Payments Working Group, and the IMF work on digital money
- Share insights of their work with other central banks, strengthen outreach and dialog, domestically and internationally, and foster an open and informed dialog on CBDC in their respective jurisdictions
Keywords: International, Banking, CBDC, Digital Currencies, Central Banks, CDC Ecosystem, Cross-Border Cooperation, BIS
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued principles for the effective management and supervision of climate-related financial risks.