PRA published a statement on the review of Solvency II Effective Value Test (EVT) parameters applicable from September 30, 2020. PRA has set the minimum deferment rate used in the EVT at 0.5% per annum while the volatility parameter to be used in the EVT remains at 13% per annum. Firms that have elected to use a minimum deferment rate of 0% to conduct the EVT prior to December 31, 2021 may continue to do so, notwithstanding the minimum deferment rate published in the statement. However, when conducting the EVT, all firms should use the published volatility parameter mentioned in the statement, regardless of the minimum deferment rate they are using.
PRA has set out the EVT in the supervisory statement (SS3/17) on illiquid unrated assets under Solvency II. PRA expects that firms will use the EVT as a diagnostic tool to monitor compliance with Solvency II requirements related to the calculation of the matching adjustment benefit where liabilities are matched by restructured equity release mortgages, recognizing the risks arising from the no negative equity guarantee feature. The minimum deferment rate parameter is an annual discount rate that applies to the current value of a property to give a price that would be agreed and settled today to take ownership of the property at some point in the future.
The minimum deferment rate in the policy statement (PS31/18) on equity release mortgages, as of December 2018, was 1% per annum, which was reduced to 0.5% per annum in September 2019 following a review of movements in long-term real interest rates. For the review in September 2020, PRA has again examined long-term real interest rates, measured using a range of swaps-based data sources, at a range of long-term tenors from 10 to 30 years. The PRA’s judgment, informed by this analysis, is to retain the minimum deferment rate used in the EVT at 0.5% per annum. PRA will keep the minimum deferment rate under review.
The volatility parameter is used in modeling the extent to which property prices could vary in the future. PRA has analyzed house price indices from Nationwide and the Office for National Statistics up to first quarter of 2020. A time series model was fitted to quarterly log-returns from each of these indices to derive values for long-term index volatility. These values were then adjusted to incorporate the effect of idiosyncratic behavior of individual properties (using data from the Land Registry). As a result of this analysis, PRA has decided to retain a value for the volatility parameter to be used in the EVT at 13%.
Keywords: Europe, UK, Insurance, Solvency II, Effective Value Test, Minimum Deferment Rate, Volatility Parameter, Equity Release Mortgage, Matching Adjustment, PRA
Previous ArticleNBB Maintains Countercyclical Capital Buffer at 0%
FCA and PRA in the UK, FED in the US, and the authorities in Singapore have fined Goldman Sachs for risk management failures in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
BCBS announced that OSFI and the Bank of Canada hosted the 21st International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) virtually on October 19-22, 2020.
FCA proposed guidance on how firms should continue to seek to help customers who hold insurance and premium finance products and may be in financial difficulty because of COVID-19, after October 31, 2020.
EBA issued an opinion on prudential treatment of the legacy instruments as the grandfathering period nears an end on December 31, 2021.
ESRB published the fifth issue of the EU Non-bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor 2020 (NBFI Monitor).
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
APRA announced that it has increased the minimum liquidity requirement of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for failing to comply with the prudential standard on liquidity.
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.