PRA published a statement on the review of Solvency II Effective Value Test (EVT) parameters applicable from September 30, 2020. PRA has set the minimum deferment rate used in the EVT at 0.5% per annum while the volatility parameter to be used in the EVT remains at 13% per annum. Firms that have elected to use a minimum deferment rate of 0% to conduct the EVT prior to December 31, 2021 may continue to do so, notwithstanding the minimum deferment rate published in the statement. However, when conducting the EVT, all firms should use the published volatility parameter mentioned in the statement, regardless of the minimum deferment rate they are using.
PRA has set out the EVT in the supervisory statement (SS3/17) on illiquid unrated assets under Solvency II. PRA expects that firms will use the EVT as a diagnostic tool to monitor compliance with Solvency II requirements related to the calculation of the matching adjustment benefit where liabilities are matched by restructured equity release mortgages, recognizing the risks arising from the no negative equity guarantee feature. The minimum deferment rate parameter is an annual discount rate that applies to the current value of a property to give a price that would be agreed and settled today to take ownership of the property at some point in the future.
The minimum deferment rate in the policy statement (PS31/18) on equity release mortgages, as of December 2018, was 1% per annum, which was reduced to 0.5% per annum in September 2019 following a review of movements in long-term real interest rates. For the review in September 2020, PRA has again examined long-term real interest rates, measured using a range of swaps-based data sources, at a range of long-term tenors from 10 to 30 years. The PRA’s judgment, informed by this analysis, is to retain the minimum deferment rate used in the EVT at 0.5% per annum. PRA will keep the minimum deferment rate under review.
The volatility parameter is used in modeling the extent to which property prices could vary in the future. PRA has analyzed house price indices from Nationwide and the Office for National Statistics up to first quarter of 2020. A time series model was fitted to quarterly log-returns from each of these indices to derive values for long-term index volatility. These values were then adjusted to incorporate the effect of idiosyncratic behavior of individual properties (using data from the Land Registry). As a result of this analysis, PRA has decided to retain a value for the volatility parameter to be used in the EVT at 13%.
Keywords: Europe, UK, Insurance, Solvency II, Effective Value Test, Minimum Deferment Rate, Volatility Parameter, Equity Release Mortgage, Matching Adjustment, PRA
Previous ArticleNBB Maintains Countercyclical Capital Buffer at 0%
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.