Featured Product

    HKMA Article Examines Public Money Recovery Arrangements Under FIRO

    September 30, 2019

    HKMA published the September 2019 issue of its Quarterly Bulletin, which featured an article that provides an overview of the ex-post public money recovery arrangements under the Financial Institutions (Resolution) Ordinance (FIRO). The article provides an overview of the resolution levy provisions under Part 12 of the FIRO, in relation to the imposition of an ex-post resolution levy to recoup any resolution funds (that is, public money paid into the resolution funding account) that was used, but not repaid, on completion of a resolution. The article represents the initial views of HKMA on this subject and should not be taken as expressing a fixed policy intent of HKMA.

    One fundamental objective of the resolution regimes is to reduce the risks of public funds being used to bail out failed systemically important financial institutions. To this end, the resolution funding arrangements under the Hong Kong resolution regime provide an ex-post levy mechanism to recover, from the wider financial system, public money paid into the resolution funding account and used in a resolution, but not repaid on completion of the resolution. An ex-post levy mechanism is consistent with international standards and has been adopted by resolution regimes in certain other jurisdictions. In 2017, FSB conducted a peer review of Hong Kong covering, among others, the Hong Kong resolution regime and published its report in 2018. One of the recommendations made in the peer review report was that authorities in Hong Kong should continue operationalizing resolution funding mechanisms, including the resolution levy framework to “underscore the authorities’ intent to recoup public funds.” 

    In light of this recommendation, HKMA has been considering how an ex-post resolution levy may operate in relation to the within scope financial institutions, under the HKMA remit as a resolution authority or a lead resolution authority. HKMA stands ready, in its capacity as the resolution authority for banking sector entities and the lead resolution authority for the designated cross-sectoral groups involving banking sector entities to provide the Financial Secretary with any support or information that may be needed in making the resolution levy regulations, if and when such a need arises.

     

    Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, FIFO, Resolution, Ex-Post Resolution Levy, Resolution Regime, FSB, HKMA

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    APRA Updates Timelines for Revision of Market Risk Standards

    The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released an update on the timelines for revisions to the market risk prudential standards and the implications for the broader capital framework.

    October 27, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS and IOSCO Propose Further Policy Work on Margining Practices

    Three global standard-setters launched a joint consultation that reviews the margining practices during the COVID-19 pandemic and identifies potential areas for further policy work.

    October 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Seeks Information Before Migrating Statistical Reporting to BEEDS

    The Bank of England (BoE) published the Statistical Notice 2021/09 requiring additional information from firms and software vendors to assist in the onboarding and testing phases for migrating statistical reporting to the BEEDS portal.

    October 25, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Finalizes Standards on Alternative SA for Market Risk

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final draft regulatory technical standards on gross jump-to-default amounts and on residual risk add-on under the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR.

    October 25, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FCA Publishes Final Rules on Investment Firms Prudential Regime

    The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the final rules on the Investment Firms Prudential Regime (IFPR) to streamline and simplify the prudential requirements for solo-regulated UK firms authorized under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID).

    October 25, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESAs Propose New Rules for Taxonomy-Related Product Disclosures

    The European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) have delivered to the European Commission (EC) the final report on the draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR).

    October 25, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Advice on Review of Crisis Management/Deposit Insurance Framework

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) published an advice to the European Commission (EC) on funding in resolution and insolvency as part of the review of the crisis management and deposit insurance (CMDI) framework.

    October 25, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSOC Report Issues Recommendations to Address Climate Risks

    The Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) released a report in response to the U.S. President's Executive Order on climate-related financial risk.

    October 21, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Paper Mulls Policies to Alleviate Challenges Posed by Big Techs

    The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a paper that examines the business models and the associated risks posed by big technology firms foraying into financial services sector.

    October 21, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS to Launch Asian Green Bond Fund Early Next Year

    The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) announced the development of an Asian Green Bond Fund, in collaboration with the development financing community, to channel global central bank reserves to green projects in Asia Pacific.

    October 21, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 7609