EIOPA published an opinion on sustainability within Solvency II. In August 2018, EIOPA received a request from EC for an opinion on sustainability within Solvency II, with focus on climate change mitigation. EIOPA believes that insurers should assess their exposure to sustainability risks, which are expected to increasingly impact the insurance sector. The opinion, among other issues, addresses the integration of climate-related risks in Solvency II Pillar I requirements. EC will take the opinion into account in the preparation of its report on Solvency II Directive, which is due by January 01, 2021.
In providing this opinion, EIOPA has followed the questions posed by EC in its request and analyzed evidence collected through a public call for evidence, a confidential request for information, and a public consultation on a draft opinion on sustainability within Solvency II. EC, in its call for opinion, had requested views of EIOPA on the integration of sustainability, specifically climate-related developments, into the Solvency II framework for the valuation of assets and liabilities, investment and underwriting practices, the calibration of market and natural catastrophe risks, and the use of internal models. The opinion covers the following areas:
- The extent to which the valuation of assets and liabilities under Solvency II (can) capture sustainability factors
- How insurance and reinsurance undertakings, through their investment and underwriting practices, can account for sustainability considerations
- How/whether sustainability risks are reflected in capital charges for market and natural catastrophe risks under Solvency II
- The extent to which internal models capture sustainability risks and factors
- The way sustainability could best be taken into account across the three pillars in Solvency II
In its opinion, EIOPA calls for insurance and reinsurance undertakings to implement measures linked with climate change-related risks, especially in view of a substantial impact to their business strategy. EIOPA opines that undertakings should assess their exposure to sustainability risks, which will increasingly impact the insurance sector over the coming years and decades. EIOPA acknowledges that the medium- to long-term impacts of climate change cannot fully be captured in the Solvency II capital requirements, which have been designed to reflect the risks that undertakings are exposed to over a one-year time horizon. Therefore, EIOPA stresses the importance of scenarios analysis in insurer risk management. The scenario analysis will allow undertakings to consider the impact of sustainability risks beyond the one-year time horizon or where timing is unpredictable.
Furthermore, EIOPA is of the opinion that within a risk-based framework like Solvency II any change to capital requirements must be based on a proven risk differential compared to the status quo. Assessment of the underlying risk is, therefore, the starting point and guiding principle for the analysis and opinion on capital requirements related to sustainability. EIOPA is of the view that the current Solvency II framework does not hinder the integration of current climate change-related developments in the calibration of the standard parameters for the natural catastrophe risk module of the standard formula. A regular recalibration of the standard parameters for the natural catastrophe risk module of the standard formula (each 3 to 5 years) should take into account future developments as well as the potential effect of climate change using the latest data and science available.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Solvency II, Climate Change Risk, Sustainable Finance, Opinion, Pillar 1, ESG, EIOPA, EC
Previous ArticleNBB Circular on Calculation of Contributions to Resolution Fund
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).