The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a paper that offers policy implementation insights on the regulatory initiatives developed in China, European Union, and the United States to address new challenges presented by big tech firms. The report focusses on five policy domains: competition, data, conduct of business, operational resilience, and financial stability. The report notes that there exists a compelling case to seek international consistency of policy developments.
The report highlights that the policy initiatives generally seek to achieve a balance between addressing the different risks posed by big tech firms and preserving the benefits they bring in terms of market efficiency and financial inclusion. Policy initiatives are addressing the operational resilience of big tech firms. These typically apply to big tech firms either as providers of financial services or as third-party service providers of financial firms. The recent initiatives constitute important steps in addressing risks posed by big tech firms, though additional regulatory responses might be needed. These will include the development of entity-based rules to address the unique combination of risks posed by big tech firms. These initiatives represent important steps in combating relevant risks posed by big tech firms. It seems likely at this stage that new policy developments may need to introduce further specific controls for big tech firms if they continue, as expected, gaining presence in the financial system either directly or through their engagement with financial institutions.
As big tech firms continue to gain prominence in the financial system, additional policy responses might be necessary. It is also very likely that new policy actions will largely need to follow an entity-based approach and require close cooperation between competition, data, and financial authorities. Moreover, given the cross-border scope of big tech activities, enhanced international regulatory cooperation is essential. There is already a compelling case to seek international consistency of policy developments. Given the cross-border scope of the activities performed by big tech firms, international regulatory cooperation seems essential. Several proposals have been put forward to enhance global collaboration on the design of policies aiming to address the challenges posed by digital technologies. There have also been efforts by international standard-setting bodies to ensure that existing financial regulation (particularly in the area of payments) properly covers the activity of new nonbank players. As the need for specific rules for big tech firms may gain ground in different jurisdictions, the availability of common international guidance on the matter should help contain the risk of regulatory fragmentation.
Keywords: International, Banking, Bigtech, Fintech, Operational Resilience, Regtech, Guidance, FSI, BIS
Previous ArticleFI to Ease Restrictions on Dividend Payments, Increase CCyB
The three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) issued a letter to inform about delay in the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) mandate, along with a Call for Evidence on greenwashing practices.
The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) of the IFRS Foundations made several announcements at COP27 and with respect to its work on the sustainability standards.
The International Organization for Securities Commissions (IOSCO), at COP27, outlined the regulatory priorities for sustainability disclosures, mitigation of greenwashing, and promotion of integrity in carbon markets.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) issued a statement in the context of COP27, clarified the operationalization of intermediate EU parent undertakings (IPUs) of third-country groups
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an annual report on its activities, a report on forward-looking work.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) finalized amendments to the capital framework, announced a review of the prudential framework for groups.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hubs and several central banks are working together on various central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilots.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published the results of its thematic review, which shows that banks are still far from adequately managing climate and environmental risks.
Among its recent publications, the European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final standards and guidelines on interest rate risk arising from non-trading book activities (IRRBB)
The European Commission (EC) recently adopted regulations with respect to the calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, the prudential treatment of global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs)