EIOPA is consulting on a supervisory statement on the use of risk mitigation techniques by insurance and reinsurance undertakings. Supervisory authorities are recommended to also apply this Supervisory Statement to insurance and reinsurance undertakings that make use of an internal model to calculate the Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR). During the consultation period, EIOPA will additionally assess potential "group issues" and "internal reinsurance." The deadline for submission of feedback to this consultation is November 24, 2020.
This Supervisory Statement is the result of analyses on the use of reinsurance structures by insurance and reinsurance undertakings that optimize the use of capital under the Solvency II framework,
when the Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) is calculated with the standard formula. The use of risk mitigation techniques can have a significant impact on the SCR. For non-life insurance, it impacts the "premium and reserve risk" and the "catastrophe risk." For life insurance, due to the newly developed structures, reinsurance contracts or other contracts that are structured as reinsurance contracts can also impact other risk modules—for example, lapse risk, longevity risk, or even expense risk. The overall impact can significantly reduce the SCR of an insurance and reinsurance undertaking and, therefore, supervisory authorities are recommended to give appropriate attention to this subject.
Independently from the eligibility criteria for recognizing risk mitigation techniques for solvency purposes, insurance and reinsurance undertakings are expected to ensure that risk mitigation is commensurate with the relief in the SCR calculation when introducing new techniques. Undertakings are required, as part of the general governance requirements, to manage risk prudently. Although the use of risk mitigation techniques in general is a good tool to mitigate the (insurance) risk, it should be recognized that the transfer of risk might introduce other risks—that is, a possible increase in counterparty default risk, basis risk and depending on the structure, concentration risk.
This Supervisory Statement should be read in conjunction with the Solvency II Directive (2009/138/EC), the Commission Delegated Regulation 2015/35, EIOPA guidelines on system of governance, and EIOPA guidelines on basis risk. The statement is intended to promote supervisory convergence on the assessment of the use of risk mitigation techniques under Solvency II, as it is recognized that potential divergent practices or potential supervisory arbitrage in this area could contribute to an unlevel playing field.
Comment Due Date: November 24, 2020
Previous ArticleHKMA Report Examines Financial Stability of Banking Sector
FCA and PRA in the UK, FED in the US, and the authorities in Singapore have fined Goldman Sachs for risk management failures in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
BCBS announced that OSFI and the Bank of Canada hosted the 21st International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) virtually on October 19-22, 2020.
FCA proposed guidance on how firms should continue to seek to help customers who hold insurance and premium finance products and may be in financial difficulty because of COVID-19, after October 31, 2020.
EBA issued an opinion on prudential treatment of the legacy instruments as the grandfathering period nears an end on December 31, 2021.
ESRB published the fifth issue of the EU Non-bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor 2020 (NBFI Monitor).
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
APRA announced that it has increased the minimum liquidity requirement of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for failing to comply with the prudential standard on liquidity.
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.