ESMA updated its questions and answers (Q&As) on the Benchmarks Regulation and the Central Securities Depository (CSD) Regulation. The updated Q&As provide answers to questions regarding practical issues on the implementation of the Benchmarks Regulation and the new CSD Regulation regime.
The Benchmarks Regulation, which entered into force on January 01, 2018, introduces new compliance requirements for benchmark administrators, contributors, and users, with regard to interest rate, foreign exchange, security, commodity, and other benchmarks used in financial transactions. The added Q&As on Benchmarks Regulation provide clarifications about the following topics:
- When the written plan to be produced by users of benchmarks should be considered robust and how such plans should be reflected in the contractual relationship with clients
- The reference to systematic internalizer in the definition of financial instruments
- When banks issuing certificates classify as users of benchmarks
- Why NAV of investment funds should be considered input data and not benchmarks
- The application for endorsement of family of benchmarks
- The language of benchmark statements
The aim of CSD Regulation is to harmonize certain aspects of the settlement cycle and settlement discipline and to provide a set of common requirements for CSDs operating securities settlement systems across EU. The latest batch of Q&As on CSD Regulation cover the following topics:
- Book-entry form requirements—The Q&A specifies the scope and timing of application of the requirement in Article 3(2) of CSDR to dematerialize certain transferable securities when they are transferred as collateral.
- Organizational requirements—The Q&A concerns the scope of the services and activities of a CSD covered by the requirements set out in Article 30 of CSD Regulation on Outsourcing.
- Settlement Discipline—ESMA published the first set of Q&As on the settlement discipline issues following the publication of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1229 on settlement discipline. The updated Q&As covers four issues in this area:
- Frequency of the update of the exchange rate used to determine the tolerance level for settlement instructions in currencies other than EUR
- Scope of the joint management of the penalty mechanism for CSDs which use a common settlement infrastructure
- Clarification that the use of a common framework or rulebook is not sufficient to comply with the requirement for joint management of the penalty mechanism by CSDs using a common settlement infrastructure
- Possibility for CSDs to perform bilateral netting of cash penalties, as long as it is followed by the aggregation of the amounts resulting in one credit and one debit amount per CSD participant
Keywords: Europe, EU, Securities, Q&A, Benchmarks Regulation, CSD Regulation, ESMA
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).
EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.