ESMA Updates Q&As on Benchmarks Regulation and CSD Regulation
ESMA updated its questions and answers (Q&As) on the Benchmarks Regulation and the Central Securities Depository (CSD) Regulation. The updated Q&As provide answers to questions regarding practical issues on the implementation of the Benchmarks Regulation and the new CSD Regulation regime.
The Benchmarks Regulation, which entered into force on January 01, 2018, introduces new compliance requirements for benchmark administrators, contributors, and users, with regard to interest rate, foreign exchange, security, commodity, and other benchmarks used in financial transactions. The added Q&As on Benchmarks Regulation provide clarifications about the following topics:
- When the written plan to be produced by users of benchmarks should be considered robust and how such plans should be reflected in the contractual relationship with clients
- The reference to systematic internalizer in the definition of financial instruments
- When banks issuing certificates classify as users of benchmarks
- Why NAV of investment funds should be considered input data and not benchmarks
- The application for endorsement of family of benchmarks
- The language of benchmark statements
The aim of CSD Regulation is to harmonize certain aspects of the settlement cycle and settlement discipline and to provide a set of common requirements for CSDs operating securities settlement systems across EU. The latest batch of Q&As on CSD Regulation cover the following topics:
- Book-entry form requirements—The Q&A specifies the scope and timing of application of the requirement in Article 3(2) of CSDR to dematerialize certain transferable securities when they are transferred as collateral.
- Organizational requirements—The Q&A concerns the scope of the services and activities of a CSD covered by the requirements set out in Article 30 of CSD Regulation on Outsourcing.
- Settlement Discipline—ESMA published the first set of Q&As on the settlement discipline issues following the publication of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1229 on settlement discipline. The updated Q&As covers four issues in this area:
- Frequency of the update of the exchange rate used to determine the tolerance level for settlement instructions in currencies other than EUR
- Scope of the joint management of the penalty mechanism for CSDs which use a common settlement infrastructure
- Clarification that the use of a common framework or rulebook is not sufficient to comply with the requirement for joint management of the penalty mechanism by CSDs using a common settlement infrastructure
- Possibility for CSDs to perform bilateral netting of cash penalties, as long as it is followed by the aggregation of the amounts resulting in one credit and one debit amount per CSD participant
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, EU, Securities, Q&A, Benchmarks Regulation, CSD Regulation, ESMA
Previous Article
Randal Quarles of FED on Trends in Urban and Rural Community BanksRelated Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.