BCBS published two reports assessing the implementation of the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) and the large exposures (LE) framework in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. These reports are a part of the Regulatory Consistency Assessment Program (RCAP) of the Basel Committee. Overall, the NSFR regulations and the LE framework in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia have been found to be "compliant" with the Basel standards. This is the highest of the four possible assessment grades.
BCBS has completed the assessments of implementation of Basel III capital and liquidity coverage ratio regulations for all the member jurisdictions. Assessments of implementation of Basel III standards related to the NSFR and large exposures framework started in 2018 and are expected to be completed by September 2020. SAMA had implemented NSFR as a minimum standard as of January 01, 2016. SAMA also implemented the large exposures framework as a minimum standard on January 01, 2016, which is three years ahead of the implementation date provided in the Basel standard. In Saudi Arabia, both regulations are applicable to all 12 locally incorporated banks on a consolidated basis.
The large exposure limits help constrain the maximum loss a bank could face in the event of a sudden failure of a counterparty or a group of connected counterparties and help ensure the bank remains a going concern. NSFR, which is a significant component of the Basel III reforms, requires banks to maintain a stable funding profile in relation to their on- and off-balance sheet activities, thus reducing the likelihood that disruptions to a bank's regular sources of funding will erode its liquidity position in a way that could increase the risk of its failure. NSFR standard of BCBS became a minimum standard by January 01, 2018.
Keywords: Middle East and Africa, Saudi Arabia, Banking, Basel III, RCAP, Large Exposures, NSFR, BCBS
Previous ArticleBCBS Updates Status of Basel Adoption in Member Jurisdictions
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.
MAS published the guidelines on individual accountability and conduct at financial institutions.
APRA published final versions of the prudential standard APS 220 on credit quality and the reporting standard ARS 923.2 on repayment deferrals.
SRB published two articles, with one article discussing the framework in place to safeguard financial stability amid crisis and the other article outlining the path to a harmonized and predictable liquidation regime.
FSB hosted a virtual workshop as part of the consultation process for its evaluation of the too-big-to-fail reforms.
ECB updated the list of supervised entities in EU, with the number of significant supervised entities being 115.
OSFI published the key findings of a study on third-party risk management.
FSB is extending the implementation timeline, by one year, for the minimum haircut standards for non-centrally cleared securities financing transactions or SFTs.