European Council notified that EU ambassadors agreed with the position of the Council on a proposal to create an EU-wide classification system, or taxonomy, to provide businesses and investors with a common language to identify what economic activities can be considered environmentally sustainable. At present, there is no common classification system at EU or global level to define an environmentally sustainable economic activity. The proposed regulation is meant to reduce fragmentation resulting from market-based initiatives and national practices and to reduce the practice of marketing financial products as green or sustainable, when in fact they do not meet basic environmental standards. According to the Council position, the taxonomy should be established by the end of 2021, to ensure its full application by end of 2022.
As set out in the European Council position, the proposal identifies and defines six EU environmental objectives—climate change mitigation; climate change adaptation; sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources; transition to a circular economy, including waste prevention and recycling; pollution prevention and control; and protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems. To qualify as environmentally sustainable, economic activities would have to fulfill the following requirements:
- Contribute substantively to at least one of the six environmental objectives
- Not significantly harm any of the environmental objectives
- Be carried out in compliance with minimum social and governance safeguards
- Comply with specific technical screening criteria
EC would then be tasked to establish the actual classification by defining technical screening criteria for each relevant environmental objective. Legally, the criteria would take the form of delegated acts regarding the sector classification of economic activities. They would be supplemented by the implementing acts defining quantitative and qualitative thresholds that must be met by an economic activity that is to be considered environmentally sustainable. EC would be assisted by a technical expert group, "Platform on sustainable finance," which would be mandated to provide advice for developing the technical screening criteria and analyze their impact in terms of potential costs and benefits of their application. In addition, EC will be advised by an expert group consisting of experts from member states on the appropriateness of the technical screening criteria. The European Parliament voted on its position in March 2019. Negotiations between the Council and the Parliament are, therefore, ready to start.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Sustainable Finance, Taxonomy, ESG, Climate Change Risk, European Parliament, European Council
Previous ArticleEBA Proposes to Create STS Framework for Synthetic Securitization
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.
MAS published the guidelines on individual accountability and conduct at financial institutions.
APRA published final versions of the prudential standard APS 220 on credit quality and the reporting standard ARS 923.2 on repayment deferrals.
SRB published two articles, with one article discussing the framework in place to safeguard financial stability amid crisis and the other article outlining the path to a harmonized and predictable liquidation regime.
FSB hosted a virtual workshop as part of the consultation process for its evaluation of the too-big-to-fail reforms.
ECB updated the list of supervised entities in EU, with the number of significant supervised entities being 115.
OSFI published the key findings of a study on third-party risk management.
FSB is extending the implementation timeline, by one year, for the minimum haircut standards for non-centrally cleared securities financing transactions or SFTs.