European Council notified that EU ambassadors agreed with the position of the Council on a proposal to create an EU-wide classification system, or taxonomy, to provide businesses and investors with a common language to identify what economic activities can be considered environmentally sustainable. At present, there is no common classification system at EU or global level to define an environmentally sustainable economic activity. The proposed regulation is meant to reduce fragmentation resulting from market-based initiatives and national practices and to reduce the practice of marketing financial products as green or sustainable, when in fact they do not meet basic environmental standards. According to the Council position, the taxonomy should be established by the end of 2021, to ensure its full application by end of 2022.
As set out in the European Council position, the proposal identifies and defines six EU environmental objectives—climate change mitigation; climate change adaptation; sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources; transition to a circular economy, including waste prevention and recycling; pollution prevention and control; and protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems. To qualify as environmentally sustainable, economic activities would have to fulfill the following requirements:
- Contribute substantively to at least one of the six environmental objectives
- Not significantly harm any of the environmental objectives
- Be carried out in compliance with minimum social and governance safeguards
- Comply with specific technical screening criteria
EC would then be tasked to establish the actual classification by defining technical screening criteria for each relevant environmental objective. Legally, the criteria would take the form of delegated acts regarding the sector classification of economic activities. They would be supplemented by the implementing acts defining quantitative and qualitative thresholds that must be met by an economic activity that is to be considered environmentally sustainable. EC would be assisted by a technical expert group, "Platform on sustainable finance," which would be mandated to provide advice for developing the technical screening criteria and analyze their impact in terms of potential costs and benefits of their application. In addition, EC will be advised by an expert group consisting of experts from member states on the appropriateness of the technical screening criteria. The European Parliament voted on its position in March 2019. Negotiations between the Council and the Parliament are, therefore, ready to start.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Sustainable Finance, Taxonomy, ESG, Climate Change Risk, European Parliament, European Council
Previous ArticleEBA Proposes to Create STS Framework for Synthetic Securitization
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).