IMF published a paper that discusses the emerging supervisory practices that contribute to effective cyber-security risk supervision. This paper highlights emerging supervisory approaches with the intention of promoting good practices. The focus is on how these practices can be adopted by the agencies that are at an early stage of developing a supervisory approach to strengthen cyber resilience. The paper notes that regulatory requirements ensuring that good cyber-security risk management practices are in place are critical.
The paper discusses the importance of addressing cyber risk and points out that financial sector supervisory authorities worldwide are working to establish and implement a framework for cyber risk supervision. Progress, however, is uneven, particularly for lower-income countries and lower-capacity supervisors, which face a number of challenges developing an effective regulatory and supervisory framework for cyber risk supervision. The goal of cyber-security risk supervision should be to influence, incentivize, and shape cyber-security capabilities of firms. Supervision activities to build resilience should include the following:
- Identify the threat landscape
- Map the cyber and financial network
- Create coherent regulation
- Conduct supervisory assessment
- Establish formal information-sharing and reporting mechanisms
- Provide adequate response and recovery
- Ensure preparedness of supervisory agencies
The experience from IMF technical assistance shows that establishing a framework for cyber-security risk supervision involves many challenges, with the dearth of specialist skills being one of the biggest challenges. Notwithstanding these, all supervisors can take action to build information-gathering and sharing systems, improve basic security practices, and identify and deploy resources toward key assets and carry out basic cyber exercises. The report highlights that the transfer of knowledge across the community of supervisors, especially lower-income and lower-capacity supervisors, will help raise resilience globally. Regulations should leverage established approaches, including those developed by industry, which will help with a convergence of standards. Although all firms face cyber-security risk, smaller- and lower-capacity firms should focus on strengthening cyber hygiene while the largest and most globally connected firms and key system nodes should be subject to heightened standards.
The report notes that authorities should work together to promote a more consistent and coordinated approach that promotes consistency and convergence. A strong regulatory and supervisory framework should allow supervisors to substantially improve the resilience of financial sector to cyber attack. Whether the regulatory framework is based on principles or rules, the framework must grant supervisors sufficient authority to address cyber-security risk and allow supervisors to be sufficiently adaptive to the dynamics of the risk.
Related Link: Report on Cyber Risk Supervision
Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Cyber Risk, Cyber Resilience Framework, Supervisory Practices, Operational Risk, IMF
Previous ArticleBundesbank Updates Plausibility Checks for Bank Reporting in Germany
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2 or Regulation 2019/876).
ESAs published a joint supervisory statement on the effective and consistent application and on national supervision of the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
EC published a public consultation on the review of crisis management and deposit insurance frameworks in EU.
HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.
EBA launched consultations on the regulatory and implementing technical standards on cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities involved in prudential supervision of investment firms.
BoE issued a letter to the CEOs of eight major UK banks that are in scope of the first Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF) reporting and disclosure cycle.