While speaking at the 24th Annual Financial CEO conference in London, Charlotte Gerken of PRA outlined the ongoing and upcoming policy work on insurance risk management. This includes a consultation paper on the prudent person principle and a supervisory statement on liquidity risk management. She also explained that PRA is thinking about capital treatment and reporting aspects in terms of addressing the cyber risk and is planning to issue a supervisory statement in the area of outsourcing and third-party risk management.
Ms. Gerken outlined the recent guidance issued and the work being in the area of liquidity management, highlighting that much of the response to complex or unmodelable risks is not quantitative but qualitative, which is the domain of the prudent person principle. In the context of Solvency II the prudent person principle sets high level, qualitative standards. Therefore, in response to increasing supervisory concerns, PRA published a consultation paper which sets out proposals for a supervisory statement that clarifies how PRA expects firms to implement the prudent person principle. PRA also published a supervisory statement on liquidity risk management for insurers and updated the existing supervisory statement on illiquid unrated assets to take into account increasing levels of investment in income-producing real estate. All three pieces of guidance concern fundamental risk management principles and how PRA expects firms to put them into practice.
She then discussed technology as the new source of risk and opportunity, highlighting the growing demand for cyber insurance. Solvency II does not mention cyber risk at all, so there is a space for firms—and regulators—to fill. However, the basic framework for dealing with these kinds of business risks is already well-established. PRA is looking at incorporating this relatively new risk into its existing approach. This means thinking about capital treatment and reporting and working with industry to facilitate a move to more explicit coverage, standardization of contracts, and remove barriers to data sharing.
According to Ms. Gerken, the bigger unknowns for PRA are arising from the changes in business models; for instance, the increasing risk of cloud outsourcing. Insurers are increasingly using third-party data storage and processing, development infrastructure, and software delivery. PRA has surveyed insurers in this area and is analyzing the results. PRA is also planning to issue a new supervisory statement on outsourcing in the near future. The supervisory statement is intended to provide a one-stop source of reference on outsourcing and third-party risk management, bringing together the previously issued guidance. PRA is also finalizing policy proposals to require firms to improve their operational resilience, including making it clear how PRA expects them to identify important business services on which they rely.
Some technology developments are creating less tractable risks, for example, machine learning. Hedging models are being built using neural networks rather than financial mathematics. These models are black boxes, producing results that are fundamentally unexplainable. Traditional models to which risk management principles are applied are built on known logic and it is possible to determine the key variables affecting results and sensitivity of the results to changes in those variables. Machine learning poses challenges for a traditional risk management framework based on identifying and analyzing key risks and dependencies. This gives rise to questions regarding how can a firm’s Board satisfy itself of the model’s prudence and appropriateness. Regulators are also struggling to understand what a governance and disclosure framework looks like for a model that cannot be explained.
Related Link: Speech
Keywords: Europe, UK, Insurance, Liquidity Risk, Solvency II, Cyber Risk, Cloud Outsourcing, Fintech, Regtech, PRA
Previous ArticleUS Agencies Publish Semi-Annual Regulatory Agenda in June 2019
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
EBA published a report that sets out the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions according to which consolidation shall be carried out in line with Article 18 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
EBA updated the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU.
BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks.
UK Authorities (FCA and PRA) welcomed the findings of FSB peer review on the implementation of financial sector remuneration reforms in the UK.
PRA and FCA jointly issued a letter that highlights risks associated with the increasing volumes of deposits that are placed with banks and building societies via deposit aggregators and how to mitigate these risks.
MFSA announced that amendments to the Banking Act, Subsidiary Legislation, and Banking Rules will be issued in the coming months, to transpose the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) into the national regulatory framework.
EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.
OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms.
ECB published results of the benchmarking analysis of the recovery plan cycle for 2019.