While speaking at the 24th Annual Financial CEO conference in London, Charlotte Gerken of PRA outlined the ongoing and upcoming policy work on insurance risk management. This includes a consultation paper on the prudent person principle and a supervisory statement on liquidity risk management. She also explained that PRA is thinking about capital treatment and reporting aspects in terms of addressing the cyber risk and is planning to issue a supervisory statement in the area of outsourcing and third-party risk management.
Ms. Gerken outlined the recent guidance issued and the work being in the area of liquidity management, highlighting that much of the response to complex or unmodelable risks is not quantitative but qualitative, which is the domain of the prudent person principle. In the context of Solvency II the prudent person principle sets high level, qualitative standards. Therefore, in response to increasing supervisory concerns, PRA published a consultation paper which sets out proposals for a supervisory statement that clarifies how PRA expects firms to implement the prudent person principle. PRA also published a supervisory statement on liquidity risk management for insurers and updated the existing supervisory statement on illiquid unrated assets to take into account increasing levels of investment in income-producing real estate. All three pieces of guidance concern fundamental risk management principles and how PRA expects firms to put them into practice.
She then discussed technology as the new source of risk and opportunity, highlighting the growing demand for cyber insurance. Solvency II does not mention cyber risk at all, so there is a space for firms—and regulators—to fill. However, the basic framework for dealing with these kinds of business risks is already well-established. PRA is looking at incorporating this relatively new risk into its existing approach. This means thinking about capital treatment and reporting and working with industry to facilitate a move to more explicit coverage, standardization of contracts, and remove barriers to data sharing.
According to Ms. Gerken, the bigger unknowns for PRA are arising from the changes in business models; for instance, the increasing risk of cloud outsourcing. Insurers are increasingly using third-party data storage and processing, development infrastructure, and software delivery. PRA has surveyed insurers in this area and is analyzing the results. PRA is also planning to issue a new supervisory statement on outsourcing in the near future. The supervisory statement is intended to provide a one-stop source of reference on outsourcing and third-party risk management, bringing together the previously issued guidance. PRA is also finalizing policy proposals to require firms to improve their operational resilience, including making it clear how PRA expects them to identify important business services on which they rely.
Some technology developments are creating less tractable risks, for example, machine learning. Hedging models are being built using neural networks rather than financial mathematics. These models are black boxes, producing results that are fundamentally unexplainable. Traditional models to which risk management principles are applied are built on known logic and it is possible to determine the key variables affecting results and sensitivity of the results to changes in those variables. Machine learning poses challenges for a traditional risk management framework based on identifying and analyzing key risks and dependencies. This gives rise to questions regarding how can a firm’s Board satisfy itself of the model’s prudence and appropriateness. Regulators are also struggling to understand what a governance and disclosure framework looks like for a model that cannot be explained.
Related Link: Speech
Keywords: Europe, UK, Insurance, Liquidity Risk, Solvency II, Cyber Risk, Cloud Outsourcing, Fintech, Regtech, PRA
Previous ArticleBoE Publishes Draft and Corrective Versions of Banking XBRL Taxonomy
PRA, via the consultation paper CP12/20, proposed changes to its rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement certain elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
EIOPA published the financial stability report that provides detailed quantitative and qualitative assessment of the key risks identified for the insurance and occupational pensions sectors in the European Economic Area.
EBA published its risk dashboard for the first quarter of 2020 together with the results of the risk assessment questionnaire.
EBA announced that the next stress testing exercise is expected to be launched at the end of January 2021 and its results are to be published at the end of July 2021.
PRA published the consultation paper CP11/20 that sets out its expectations and guidance related to auditors’ work on the matching adjustment under Solvency II.
MAS published a statement guidance on dividend distribution by banks.
APRA updated its capital management guidance for banks, particularly easing restrictions around paying dividends as institutions continue to manage the disruption caused by COVID-19 pandemic.
FSB published a report that reviews the progress on data collection for macro-prudential analysis and the availability and use of macro-prudential tools in Germany.
EBA issued a statement reminding financial institutions that the transition period between EU and UK will expire on December 31, 2020; this will end the possibility for the UK-based financial institutions to offer financial services to EU customers on a cross-border basis via passporting.
SRB published guidance on operational continuity in resolution and financial market infrastructure (FMI) contingency plans.