APRA has concluded its review of the comprehensive plans of authorized deposit-taking institutions for the assessment and management of loans with repayment deferrals. In a letter addressed to these institutions, APRA encourages these institutions to consider the "better practice(s)" identified during the review of submitted plans. The identified practices span areas such as governance and oversight, customer engagement and contact strategies, credit assessment processes, and credit management and resourcing.
APRA acknowledges that preparation and submission of these plans represents a significant milestone in the transition of borrowers, who have been provided a repayment deferral, back to making repayments where possible. In the letter, authorized deposit-taking institutions are are encouraged to consider the following areas of better practice:
- Governance and oversight. Better practice provided for regular operational reporting to senior management to enable timely escalation of issues that may require management attention and oversight of progress against the implementation of the plan by the Board/Board Committee.
- Customer engagement and contact strategies. Most plans appropriately allowed for sufficient time to contact customers and arrive at a credit decision prior to the expiry of the deferral. Better practice incorporated a series of contacts, using multiple contact media over an extended period of up to six weeks prior to deferral expiry. Additionally, most plans appropriately and definitively considered the treatment of loans for uncontactable customers. Where repayments are to be recommenced for these customers without contact, better practice involved close monitoring the performance of these loans and additional contact strategies where payments are subsequently missed.
- Credit assessment processes. As expected, plans included clear and well-articulated credit assessment processes in circumstances where the borrower requires additional assistance in terms of restructuring loans, extending the deferral, or hardship/default. Better practice incorporated strong quality assurance processes and controls around customer conversations and credit assessment decisions to ensure consistency in customer outcomes were implemented. Better practice also included appropriate controls to detect system and process errors and ensure that borrowers receive assistance in a manner that is consistent with that which has been presented and offered to them by the institution.
- Credit management and resourcing. While material additional resourcing has been committed by many institutions to implement their plan, this was frequently based on best estimates of volumes and time taken for calls, with scope for material variation to occur. Better practice plans incorporated strong operational reporting capability, with regular oversight by Executive Management, supported by contingency plans for identification, training, and allocation of additional resources at short notice, should the need arise.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, COVID-19, Governance, Payment Deferrals, Credit Risk, Basel, APRA
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous ArticleMAS Amends Notice on Capital Adequacy Requirements of Banks
FCA and PRA in the UK, FED in the US, and the authorities in Singapore have fined Goldman Sachs for risk management failures in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
BCBS announced that OSFI and the Bank of Canada hosted the 21st International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) virtually on October 19-22, 2020.
FCA proposed guidance on how firms should continue to seek to help customers who hold insurance and premium finance products and may be in financial difficulty because of COVID-19, after October 31, 2020.
EBA issued an opinion on prudential treatment of the legacy instruments as the grandfathering period nears an end on December 31, 2021.
ESRB published the fifth issue of the EU Non-bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor 2020 (NBFI Monitor).
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
APRA announced that it has increased the minimum liquidity requirement of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for failing to comply with the prudential standard on liquidity.
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.