PRA to Impose No Further Restrictions on Proprietary Trading by Banks
PRA published a report that reviews the extent of proprietary trading engaged in by PRA-authorized deposit takers and investment firms incorporated in UK. The report discusses the extent of the proprietary trading activity, the risks it poses to the safety and soundness of firms, the tools PRA has to mitigate these risks, and the experience of other countries in restricting proprietary trading within the banking sector. It also addresses whether the ring-fencing regime, together with the other tools available to PRA, are sufficient to mitigate the risks proprietary trading poses to financial stability and soundness of firms. The analysis concludes that, at present, no further restrictions ought to be imposed on proprietary trading by banks.
The report has been prepared pursuant to Section 9 of the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013. During the debates which preceded the 2013 Act, the question arose as to whether the UK should impose some form of ban on proprietary trading by all banks, as, for instance, the United States had with the Volcker Rule. Parliament took the view that there should be strong restrictions on proprietary risk-taking within ring-fenced banks, but that a complete ban for all banks was not justified by the evidence available at the time. Instead, PRA was required to review the case for further restrictions on proprietary trading within a year of the commencement of ring-fencing. As mandated in the legislation, this report has been submitted to HM Treasury and laid before Parliament. This report, which is a result of the mandated review, concludes that no further restrictions ought to be imposed on proprietary trading by banks.
The review also points out that PRA already has substantial supervisory powers for mitigating the risks created by proprietary trading in its various forms, where appropriate; therefore, it does not need new powers to address these risks. Different risks are addressed using different tools, including capital requirements, disclosure, supervisory expectations concerning controls, governance and risk management, and senior management attestation. The analysis also highlights that certain policy measures in the implementation phase will improve the treatment of some proprietary trading risks within banks. Prominently, the fundamental review of the trading book, being implemented as part of the Basel 3.1 package, will clarify the boundary between banks’ trading and banking books and will improve the capitalization of trading book risks. There is some risk that conditions may change to make proprietary trading, including classic proprietary trading, more attractive for firms within the banking sector once again. While this seems unlikely at present, it is possible. Thus, PRA will continue to monitor a number of indicators that could indicate a growth in the risks arising from proprietary trading activity by relevant authorized persons and will investigate if these show a substantially higher trend.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Proprietary Trading, Volcker Rule, Credit Risk, Market Risk, Ring Fencing, Basel, PRA
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Pierre-Etienne Chabanel
Brings expertise in technology and software solutions around banking regulation, whether deployed on-premises or in the cloud.
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Related Articles
Regulators Fine Goldman Sachs for Risk Management Failures
FCA and PRA in the UK, FED in the US, and the authorities in Singapore have fined Goldman Sachs for risk management failures in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
Canada Hosts International Conference of Banking Supervisors
BCBS announced that OSFI and the Bank of Canada hosted the 21st International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) virtually on October 19-22, 2020.
FCA Proposes More Measures to Help Insurance Customers Amid Crisis
FCA proposed guidance on how firms should continue to seek to help customers who hold insurance and premium finance products and may be in financial difficulty because of COVID-19, after October 31, 2020.
EBA Issues Opinion to Address Risk Stemming from Legacy Instruments
EBA issued an opinion on prudential treatment of the legacy instruments as the grandfathering period nears an end on December 31, 2021.
ESRB Publishes Non-Bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor for 2020
ESRB published the fifth issue of the EU Non-bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor 2020 (NBFI Monitor).
HM Treasury Publishes Policy Statement Amending Benchmarks Regulation
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
APRA Initiates Action Against a Bank for Liquidity Compliance Breach
APRA announced that it has increased the minimum liquidity requirement of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for failing to comply with the prudential standard on liquidity.
PRA Consults on Implementation of Certain Provisions of CRD5 and CRR2
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies Finalize Rule to Reduce Impact of Large Bank Failures
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies Finalize Rule on Net Stable Funding Ratio Requirements
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.
