ECB published an opinion (CON/2020/20) on the proposal for a regulation to amend the Benchmarks Regulation (2016/1011) regarding the exemption of certain third-country foreign-exchange benchmarks and the designation of replacement benchmarks for certain benchmarks in cessation. ECB, in its opinion, which is a response to a request from European Council, welcomes the main objective of the proposed regulation by empowering EC to adopt an Implementing Act to designate a statutory replacement rate for benchmarks that are undergoing a supervised process of orderly cessation. Where ECB recommends amendments to the proposed regulation, it has set out specific drafting proposals in a separate technical working document that has been appended to this opinion.
Upon the date of entry into force of the Commission Implementing Act, the replacement benchmark designated in that act would replace, by operation of law, all references to the benchmark that has ceased to be published in all financial contracts and instruments and measurements of the performance of an investment fund, subject to Benchmarks Regulation, where these contain no suitable fallback provisions. ECB also supports the proposed exemption, from Benchmarks Regulation, of foreign-exchange benchmarks administered from third countries that refer to a spot exchange rate of a third-country currency that is not freely convertible and that fulfil the other criteria set out in the proposed regulation. ECB notes that EC’s proposed power to designate a replacement rate is aimed primarily at contracts with EU-supervised entities that reference the LIBOR, as this benchmark may not be sustained after the end of 2021.
ECB does not view the proposed availability of a statutory replacement rate mechanism as an alternative to the transition from EURIBOR or LIBOR where a contract can feasibly be amended. ECB notes that, pursuant to the proposed regulation, when adopting the Implementing Act to designate a replacement benchmark, EC would be required to take into account, where available, the recommendation by an alternative reference rate working group operating under the auspices of the central bank responsible for the currency in which the interest rates of the replacement benchmark are denominated. ECB also notes that the proposed regulation does not set out the criteria for determining whether the fallback provisions in a contract referencing the benchmark in cessation are unsuitable and, hence, fall into the category of contracts to which the designated replacement rate would be applied, should ceasing publication of the benchmark be considered to significantly disrupt the functioning of financial markets in EU.
Related Link: Opinion (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Financial Benchmarks, LIBOR, Benchmark Reforms, Opinion, Third Country Benchmarks, EC, ECB
Previous ArticleEBA Provides Opinion on Definition of Credit Institution in CRR
FCA and PRA in the UK, FED in the US, and the authorities in Singapore have fined Goldman Sachs for risk management failures in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
BCBS announced that OSFI and the Bank of Canada hosted the 21st International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) virtually on October 19-22, 2020.
FCA proposed guidance on how firms should continue to seek to help customers who hold insurance and premium finance products and may be in financial difficulty because of COVID-19, after October 31, 2020.
EBA issued an opinion on prudential treatment of the legacy instruments as the grandfathering period nears an end on December 31, 2021.
ESRB published the fifth issue of the EU Non-bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor 2020 (NBFI Monitor).
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
APRA announced that it has increased the minimum liquidity requirement of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for failing to comply with the prudential standard on liquidity.
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.