ECB published an opinion (CON/2020/20) on the proposal for a regulation to amend the Benchmarks Regulation (2016/1011) regarding the exemption of certain third-country foreign-exchange benchmarks and the designation of replacement benchmarks for certain benchmarks in cessation. ECB, in its opinion, which is a response to a request from European Council, welcomes the main objective of the proposed regulation by empowering EC to adopt an Implementing Act to designate a statutory replacement rate for benchmarks that are undergoing a supervised process of orderly cessation. Where ECB recommends amendments to the proposed regulation, it has set out specific drafting proposals in a separate technical working document that has been appended to this opinion.
Upon the date of entry into force of the Commission Implementing Act, the replacement benchmark designated in that act would replace, by operation of law, all references to the benchmark that has ceased to be published in all financial contracts and instruments and measurements of the performance of an investment fund, subject to Benchmarks Regulation, where these contain no suitable fallback provisions. ECB also supports the proposed exemption, from Benchmarks Regulation, of foreign-exchange benchmarks administered from third countries that refer to a spot exchange rate of a third-country currency that is not freely convertible and that fulfil the other criteria set out in the proposed regulation. ECB notes that EC’s proposed power to designate a replacement rate is aimed primarily at contracts with EU-supervised entities that reference the LIBOR, as this benchmark may not be sustained after the end of 2021.
ECB does not view the proposed availability of a statutory replacement rate mechanism as an alternative to the transition from EURIBOR or LIBOR where a contract can feasibly be amended. ECB notes that, pursuant to the proposed regulation, when adopting the Implementing Act to designate a replacement benchmark, EC would be required to take into account, where available, the recommendation by an alternative reference rate working group operating under the auspices of the central bank responsible for the currency in which the interest rates of the replacement benchmark are denominated. ECB also notes that the proposed regulation does not set out the criteria for determining whether the fallback provisions in a contract referencing the benchmark in cessation are unsuitable and, hence, fall into the category of contracts to which the designated replacement rate would be applied, should ceasing publication of the benchmark be considered to significantly disrupt the functioning of financial markets in EU.
Related Link: Opinion (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Financial Benchmarks, LIBOR, Benchmark Reforms, Opinion, Third Country Benchmarks, EC, ECB
Previous ArticleEBA Provides Opinion on Definition of Credit Institution in CRR
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
EBA published a report that sets out the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions according to which consolidation shall be carried out in line with Article 18 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
EBA updated the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU.
BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks.
UK Authorities (FCA and PRA) welcomed the findings of FSB peer review on the implementation of financial sector remuneration reforms in the UK.
PRA and FCA jointly issued a letter that highlights risks associated with the increasing volumes of deposits that are placed with banks and building societies via deposit aggregators and how to mitigate these risks.
MFSA announced that amendments to the Banking Act, Subsidiary Legislation, and Banking Rules will be issued in the coming months, to transpose the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) into the national regulatory framework.
EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.
OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms.
ECB published results of the benchmarking analysis of the recovery plan cycle for 2019.