ISDA launched a consultation on the final parameters for the adjustments that will apply to alternative risk-free rates if derivatives fallbacks are triggered. The deadline for responses to the consultation is October 23, 2019. This latest publication follows two earlier consultations, which set out options for the adjustments that will apply to the relevant risk-free rates if fallbacks are triggered for derivatives referencing nine interbank offered rates (IBORs). ISDA has also published a report by The Brattle Group that summarizes the final results of the second of those consultations, which focused on US dollar LIBOR, CDOR from Canada, and HIBOR from Hong Kong.
This consultation is intended to finalize the methodologies for the adjustments that will be made to derivatives fallbacks in the event certain interbank offered rates (IBORs) are permanently discontinued. These adjustments are necessary because of the differences between the IBORs and the risk-free rates. The adjustments reflect that the IBORs are currently available in multiple tenors, but the risk-free rates identified as fallbacks are overnight rates. The IBORs also incorporate a bank credit risk premium and a variety of other factors, while risk-free rates do not. The Brattle Group report confirms preliminary findings that the overwhelming majority of respondents preferred the "compounded setting in arrears rate" to address the difference in tenors and the "historical mean/median approach" to address the difference in risk premia.
Based on the results of this consultation, ISDA will make the relevant adjustments to the 2006 ISDA Definitions to incorporate fallbacks for new IBOR trades. A protocol will also be published to enable market participants to include fallbacks within legacy IBOR contracts if they choose to. Both the amended Definitions and the protocol are expected to be finalized by the end of this year, with implementation in 2020.
Comment Due Date: October 23, 2019
Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, IBORs, LIBOR, HIBOR, Benchmark Fallbacks, Interest Rate Benchmarks, Risk-Free Rates, ISDA Protocol, ISDA Definitions, ISDA
Previous ArticleESMA Issues Response to IASB Draft on Interest Rate Benchmark Reform
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.