US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) proposed to amend the regulatory capital rule to revise the definition of high volatility commercial real estate (HVCRE) exposures. The revision is intended to conform to the statutory definition of high volatility commercial real estate acquisition, development, or construction (HVCRE ADC) loan, in accordance with section 214 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection (EGRRCP) Act. Comments must be received by 60 days after date of publication in the Federal Register. The changes, when finalized, would apply to all banking organizations subject to the capital rules of the agencies.
To facilitate consistent application of the revised HVCRE exposure definition, the US Agencies propose to interpret certain terms in the revised HVCRE exposure definition generally consistent with their usage in other relevant regulations or the instructions to the Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (Call Report), where applicable, and request comment on whether any other terms in the revised definition would also require interpretation. In accordance with section 214 of EGRRCP Act, the US Agencies are proposing to revise the HVCRE exposure definition in section 2 of the capital rule to conform to the statutory definition of an HVCRE ADC loan. The revised definition of an HVCRE exposure would be applicable to the calculation of risk-weighted assets under both the standardized approach and the internal ratings-based approach.
Section 214 of EGRRCP Act amends the Federal Deposit Insurance (FDI) Act by adding a new section 51 to provide a statutory definition of a HVCRE ADC loan. The statute states the US Agencies may only require a depository institution to assign a heightened risk-weight to an HVCRE exposure, as defined under the capital rule, if such exposure is an HVCRE ADC loan under the EGRRCP Act. The statutory HVCRE ADC loan definition excludes any loan made prior to January 01, 2015. Section 214 became effective on enactment of the statute.
The US Agencies, in July 2018, issued an interagency statement, which provided information on rules and associated reporting requirements that the US Agencies jointly administer and that EGRRCP Act immediately affected. With respect to section 214, the interagency statement provides that institutions may use available information to reasonably estimate and report only HVCRE ADC loans in their Call Report and may refine these estimates in good faith as they obtain additional information. As an alternative to reporting HVCRE ADC loans, the interagency statement indicates that an institution may continue to report and risk-weight HVCRE exposures in a manner consistent with the current instructions to the Call Report, until the US Agencies take further action.
Comment Due Date: FR+60 Days
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, HVCRE, Commercial Real Estate, EGRRCP Act, Call Report, US Agencies
Previous ArticleDNB Publishes IMV Benchmarking Report on Digital Reporting Portal
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.
MAS published the guidelines on individual accountability and conduct at financial institutions.
APRA published final versions of the prudential standard APS 220 on credit quality and the reporting standard ARS 923.2 on repayment deferrals.
SRB published two articles, with one article discussing the framework in place to safeguard financial stability amid crisis and the other article outlining the path to a harmonized and predictable liquidation regime.
FSB hosted a virtual workshop as part of the consultation process for its evaluation of the too-big-to-fail reforms.
ECB updated the list of supervised entities in EU, with the number of significant supervised entities being 115.
OSFI published the key findings of a study on third-party risk management.
FSB is extending the implementation timeline, by one year, for the minimum haircut standards for non-centrally cleared securities financing transactions or SFTs.