At the ACPR Conference on Financial Supervision in Paris, the ECB President Mario Draghi outlined the benefits of banking supervision in Europe and examined ways to improve European supervision to foster banking integration. He also emphasized that progress in completing the Banking Union—namely, first harmonizing options and discretions (O&Ds), completing resolution, and laying groundwork for the creation of an effective deposit insurance—is essential.
Mr. Draghi described the three important benefits of European supervision that have been instrumental in making banks more resilient: it harmonizes supervisory practices, adopts a system-wide perspective when monitoring and mitigating risks, and reduces fragmentation in the supervisory framework. While discussing the benefits of European supervision when compared with the fragmented system of national supervision, he highlighted that European supervisors have identified 175 O&Ds available under the EU law; out of these, 130 O&Ds are available to national supervisors and are applied in a uniform way across the euro area. More harmonized rules have helped rebuild confidence in banks and reduce compliance costs for cross-border groups. However, the remaining O&Ds exercised by the national legislation still stand in the way of a level playing field for banks; thus, further legislative action is still needed. He added that harmonization of national insolvency rules is needed to make European resolution more effective.
Next, he discussed the two "important obstacles that exist in the area of supervision." The first is related to legacy assets, which have weighed on cross-border lending and which include non-performing loans (NPLs) and level 2 and 3 exposures. Although, over the past three years, the NPL stock of significant banks decreased by one third, NPL ratios of euro area banks are still higher than those of U.S. banks. Further efforts are needed from banks, supervisors and regulators to reduce the remaining stock of NPLs, especially in those countries where the NPL ratio remains high. European supervision also needs to continue and extend its work on the valuation of level 2 and 3 exposures.
According to Mr. Draghi, the second obstacle to cross-border integration lies within the prudential framework. Regulatory capital cannot be freely allocated across subsidiaries of cross-border groups. Banks are required to comply with capital requirements on a standalone basis and waivers can only be applied to domestic banking groups. While the free movement of liquidity across borders is made possible by cross-border waivers, the practical application of these waivers is hampered by the remaining national prerogatives in the regulatory framework, which allow national authorities to apply large exposure limits on intragroup lending and ring-fence liquidity. The free movement of funds is a precondition for a single banking market.
Among other regulatory factors that are hampering cross-border integration, the international regulatory framework does not treat the euro area as a single jurisdiction for the purposes of calculating capital surcharges (global systemically important bank, or G-SIB, buffers). Intra-euro area cross-border loans from euro area banks are considered foreign loans, leading to higher systemic risk scores and capital requirements relative to their international peers. Therefore, it is crucial that reforms to complete the Banking Union do not lose steam, so that the euro area can be treated as a single jurisdiction in the international G-SIB framework. In conclusion, the ECB President reiterated the importance of completing the Baking Union and added that he is "confident that significant steps in this direction will soon be taken."
Related Link: Speech
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Banking Union, Single EU Jurisdiction, Options and Discretions, NPLs, G-SIBs, ECB
Previous ArticleECB Reviews Profitability and Business Models of Banks in Euro Area
PRA, via the consultation paper CP12/20, proposed changes to its rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement certain elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
EIOPA published the financial stability report that provides detailed quantitative and qualitative assessment of the key risks identified for the insurance and occupational pensions sectors in the European Economic Area.
EBA published its risk dashboard for the first quarter of 2020 together with the results of the risk assessment questionnaire.
EBA announced that the next stress testing exercise is expected to be launched at the end of January 2021 and its results are to be published at the end of July 2021.
PRA published the consultation paper CP11/20 that sets out its expectations and guidance related to auditors’ work on the matching adjustment under Solvency II.
MAS published a statement guidance on dividend distribution by banks.
APRA updated its capital management guidance for banks, particularly easing restrictions around paying dividends as institutions continue to manage the disruption caused by COVID-19 pandemic.
FSB published a report that reviews the progress on data collection for macro-prudential analysis and the availability and use of macro-prudential tools in Germany.
EBA issued a statement reminding financial institutions that the transition period between EU and UK will expire on December 31, 2020; this will end the possibility for the UK-based financial institutions to offer financial services to EU customers on a cross-border basis via passporting.
SRB published guidance on operational continuity in resolution and financial market infrastructure (FMI) contingency plans.