BIS published a report on the results of a study on monitoring of fast-paced electronic markets. The report examines major developments in the evolution of market structure and their implications for central banks. It also offers and overview of core components (in terms of data, tools, and analytics) of effective fast-paced electronic market monitoring, includes statistics on notable trends, and outlines the priorities and approaches of central banks in undertaking near-time and medium-term market monitoring.
Foreign exchange and other fast-paced electronic markets have undergone significant structural changes in recent years. Trading has become increasingly electronic and automated, the use of machine learning is nascent but growing, incumbents are responding to the emergence of new participants, and activity has migrated across a range of trading venues. Moreover, the availability of data for market monitoring has increased substantially. The report points to an overall trend among central banks toward greater use of high-frequency, transaction-level data.
The study also found limitations in the use of Markets in Financial Instruments (MiFID II) data to monitor foreign exchange and other fast-paced electronic markets. Although the use of these data seems promising, it faces three challenges in the form of limitation due to the scope of the legislation, the frequency of the collection, and the lack of centralization of aggregated data. As per the report, amid all these developments, the following key structural trends have emerged:
- Trading is increasingly fragmented across a range of new venues, while the frequency of activity and speed of information flows have accelerated significantly, especially in foreign exchange markets.
- Liquidity provision has become more concentrated among the largest banks, as smaller players resort to an agency model of market-making or exit the business altogether. Additionally, a new set of non-bank intermediaries, most notably principal trading firms, have strengthened their positions.
- Greater electronification has led to the commoditization of large quantities of high-frequency data.
Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, PMI, Electronic Trading, Market Monitoring, Foreign Exchange, MiFID II, Data, BIS
Previous ArticleBoE Launches Public Register for the UK Money Markets Code
BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test.
EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism.
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.
ECB published results of the quarterly lending survey conducted on 143 banks in the euro area.
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.
EBA published the annual report on asset encumbrance of banks in EU.
MAS revised the guidelines that address technology and cyber risks of financial institutions, in an environment of growing use of cloud technologies, application programming interfaces, and rapid software development.
FCA proposed two sets of guidance on the approaches to mortgage repossessions and consumer credit repossessions, with comment period ending on January 18, 2021.
FED updated the reporting form and instructions for the FR Y-9C report on consolidated financial statements for holding companies.
EBA issued a consultation paper on the guidelines on monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects of the establishment of intermediate EU parent undertakings, or IPUs, as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive.