The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to clarify the regulatory capital treatment of investments in the overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries. The FAQs are relevant for authorized deposit-taking institutions that hold these investments via holding companies. Through this set of FAQs, APRA confirmed that institutions can use the indirect equity investment provisions in APS 111, the prudential standard on capital adequacy (the January 01, 2022 version of the standard), to determine the capital treatment for these exposures.
In the FAQs, APRA clarified the method for calculating the amount of capital institutions need to hold against their exposures to overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries that are held through non-operating holding companies for capital purposes, at Level 1. The amount of capital to be held by an authorized deposit-taking institution against its equity investments in overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries may, at Level 1, be determined using the "look-through" method in APS 111. An authorized deposit-taking institution may treat the underlying investments in its overseas banking and insurance subsidiaries as indirect equity exposures. APRA considers that indirect equity exposures represent exposures that will result in a loss to the institution that is substantially equivalent to any loss in the direct holding. Therefore, an authorized deposit-taking institution, may, if the overseas deposit-taking or insurance subsidiary meets these criteria, use the concessional approach in paragraph 9(f). APRA expects an authorized deposit-taking institution wishing to use this approach in respect of an offshore deposit-taking or insurance subsidiary to notify APRA.
APRA also clarified differences in the treatment of equity and debt exposures to overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries held through non-operating holding companies for capital purposes at Level 1. APRA expects that any debt provided to these non-operating holding companies, which funds equity or capital investments in overseas deposit-taking or insurance subsidiaries, will not be risk-weighted as debt. Instead, this debt will be included as part of the indirect equity exposure in the overseas deposit-taking or insurance subsidiary.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Regulatory Capital, APS 111, Basel, Risk-Weighted Assets, FAQ, APRA
Previous ArticleHKMA Endorses Industry Guidance to Support LIBOR Transition
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.