BIS Quarterly Review Discusses Green Bond Ratings and Bank-NBFI Links
BIS published its Quarterly Review in September 2020. This quarterly review looks at the recovery of financial market from acute stress in March, noting that the upturn has been uneven and corporate balance sheets remain fragile. The review highlights that credit rating outlooks for banks are still generally negative. The concern in the credit default swap (CDS) markets over lower-rated banks underscores the value of a cautious approach to bank capital amid uncertainty about the evolution of the pandemic and the underlying quality of banks’ assets. This issue of quarterly review includes special features that, among others, explore the potential benefits of a firm-level rating system for green bonds and carbon emissions and the vulnerabilities associated with cross-border links between banks and non-bank financial institutions (NBFIs).
The special feature on green bonds highlights the potential benefits of a firm-level rating based on carbon intensity (emissions relative to revenue) to complement the existing project-based green labels. Such a rating system could provide a useful signal to investors and encourage firms to reduce their carbon footprint. Current labels for green bonds do not necessarily signal that issuers have a lower or decreasing carbon intensity, measured as emissions relative to revenue. Such ratings, which could complement the existing labeling systems, can be designed to provide extra incentives for large carbon emitters to help combat climate change. An additional benefit of firm-level ratings is that investors could also use them to rate any financial instruments issued by a firm, including stocks and not only bonds, which only a limited number of companies issue.
The special feature on cross-border links between banks and NBFIs highlights that the financial market turmoil triggered by COVID-19 revealed the growing importance of NBFIs as bank counterparties. The special feature also points out the several vulnerabilities associated with cross-border linkages between banks and NBFIs. While adding to the understanding of the bank-NBFI nexus, the special feature points to important data gaps. Enhancing the available data along four dimensions would help give a fuller picture of financial vulnerabilities and the attendant transmission channels. These dimensions are the domestic exposures between banks and NBFIs, the specific types of NBFIs that banks have as counterparties, the exposures in the NBFI sector, and the financial instruments underpinning all exposures. The sheer size of NBFIs and their growing interconnectedness with banks warrants continued monitoring by authorities. Some NBFIs face a substantially different regulatory environment compared with banks, in addition to no or limited formal access to central bank liquidity or public-sector credit guarantees, all of which only heightens the need for such monitoring.
Related Links
Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, Green Bonds, ESG, Climate Change Risk, NBFI, COVID-19, Credit Ratings, Quarterly Review, Cross-Border Banking, BIS
Featured Experts
Victor Calanog, Ph.D.
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous Article
OSFI Initiates Consultation on Technology Risks in Financial SectorRelated Articles
HKMA Sets Out Regulatory Treatment for Personal Loan Guarantee Scheme
HKMA has published a circular that sets out the regulatory and reporting treatment for loans that participating authorized institutions may grant to eligible borrowers under the 100% Personal Loan Guarantee Scheme.
ECB Completes Targeted Review of Internal Models of Banks
ECB published the results of the assessment of internal models that banks use to calculate risk-weighted assets for credit, market, and counterparty credit risks.
PRA on Regulatory Treatment of Loans Under Mortgage Guarantee Scheme
PRA published a statement on the regulatory treatment of retail residential mortgage loans under the Mortgage Guarantee Scheme, or MGS.
FCA Consults on Rules and Reporting Forms for Investment Firms Regime
FCA is consulting, via CP21/7, on the second phase of proposed rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR).
HMT and BoE Decide to Explore Central Bank Digital Currency in UK
HM Treasury and BoE announced the joint creation of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) Taskforce to coordinate the exploration of a potential central bank digital currency in UK.
EIOPA Sets Out Expectations on Use of Climate Risk Scenarios in ORSA
EIOPA published an opinion to set out its expectations on the supervision of the integration of climate change risk scenarios by insurers in their Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA).
EC Sets Out Standards for MREL Reporting by Competent Authorities
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/622 that lays down implementing technical standards for reporting of the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL).
BCBS to Advance Work on Suptech, Climate Risk, and Basel Monitoring
BCBS has set out the strategic work priorities, as part of its the work program for 2021-22.
Bundesbank Updates AnaCredit Reporting Requirements
Bundesbank published two circulars on AnaCredit reporting requirements. Circular 27/2021 covers changes to the reporting of branches, additional attributes to be reported for investment funds from August 01, 2021, and updates to the list of international organizations.
PRA Finalizes Supervisory Approach for Non-Systemic Banks in UK
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
