The European Parliament (EP) published a briefing that outlines the main purposes of the “enabling regulatory framework” for the development of sovereign bond-backed securities (SBBS). The briefing also focuses on significant differences between the original ESRB proposal and the concept of SBBS, which no longer suggests institutional changes nor amendments to the existing regulatory treatment for sovereign debts. Absent such "flanking" measures to SBBS, the question is raised as to whether SBBS, as proposed by EC, would be met by sufficient demand.
SBBS has been presented by EC as a market-driven initiative. By removing the regulatory obstacles that have hindered its development, this enabling framework would put SSBS to a market test. In that context, SBBS has been portrayed by the EC Vice President Dombrovskis at the May 2018 structural dialog as “a proposal on its own.” EC had proposed the regulation on sovereign bond-backed securities (SBBS) in the EU on May 24, 2018 and the comment period for the proposed regulation ended on July 20, 2018.
The proposal lays down precise eligibility criteria for SBBS to benefit from the envisaged regulatory treatment. Such standardization will enhance the liquidity of SBBS and make them appealing to a larger number of investors. The proposal also amends a number of legislative acts setting out the regulatory treatment of SBBS held by banks and other financial operators. The proposed regulation lays down a general framework for SBBSs and applies to original purchasers, special purpose entities, investors, and any other entity involved in the issuance or holding of SBBSs. The underlying portfolio of an SBBS issue shall only consist of sovereign bonds of member states whose currency is the euro and the proceeds from the redemption of those sovereign bonds.
Related Link: EP Briefing (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, SBBS, Sovereign Bonds, Briefing, European Parliament
Previous ArticleESMA Updates List of Technical Standards Under Its Mandate
HM Treasury notified that, after considering all responses, the government intends to bring forward further legislation, when the Parliamentary time allows, to address issues identified in the consultation on supporting the wind-down of critical benchmarks.
EIOPA launched the 2021 stress test for the insurance sector in EU.
UK authorities jointly published the third edition of Regulatory Initiatives Grid setting out the planned regulatory initiatives for the next 24 months.
EC is requesting feedback on the proposed Commission Delegated Regulation on the content, methodology, and presentation of information that large financial and non-financial undertakings should disclose about their environmentally sustainable economic activities under the Taxonomy Regulation.
OSFI has set out the near-term priorities for federally regulated financial institutions and federally regulated private pension plans for the coming months until March 31, 2022.
Under the Italian G20 Presidency, BIS Innovation Hub and the Italian central bank BDI launched the second edition of the G20 TechSprint on the lookout for innovative solutions to resolve operational problems in green and sustainable finance.
ACPR published Version 1.0.0 of the RUBA taxonomy, which will come into force from the decree of January 31, 2022.
EBA proposed the regulatory technical standards on a central database on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) in EU.
ECB published its response to the targeted EC consultation on the review of the bank crisis management and deposit insurance framework in EU.
BCBS, CPMI, and IOSCO (the Committees) are inviting entities that participate in market infrastructures and securities markets through an intermediary as well as non-bank intermediaries to complete voluntary surveys on the use of margin calls.