Featured Product

    BoE Paper on Market-Implied Systemic Risk and Shadow Capital Adequacy

    September 13, 2019

    BoE published a working paper that presents a forward-looking approach to measure systemic solvency risk. The approach uses contingent claims analysis as a theoretical foundation for determining an institution’s default risk based on the uncertainty in its asset value relative to promised debt payments over time. The paper describes the jump diffusion process and how the model parameters are used to calculate the implicit put option values of each bank and describes the data and the empirical results relating to the determination of market-implied expected losses of individual banks. The paper also discusses how these bank-specific expected losses can be used to generate a multivariate density of expected losses with extreme value dependence and explains how the estimation results can inform the design of a market-based capital assessment to complement existing prudential approaches.

    This paper applied the Systemic contingent claims analysis framework to model the market-implied systemic solvency risk in the UK banking sector by controlling for common factors affecting the interlinkages between individual risk-adjusted balance sheets of the largest commercial banks (Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, and RBS). This approach explicitly acknowledges non-linearities in measuring default risk using a generalized extreme value (GEV) distribution setup to quantify simultaneous distress. The underlying option pricing formula for measuring expected losses was augmented with a jump diffusion process of banks’ asset values to mitigate the empirical shortcomings of traditional single-firm structural default models. Accounting for the occurrence of large and interrelated changes of expected losses provides an early indication of systemic risk outside known episodes of system-wide stress. 

    During times of stress (such as the global financial crisis), joint expected losses become very sensitive to extreme shocks at higher levels of statistical confidence. The cross-validation of the results with the aggregate outcomes of alternative (bivariate) systemic risk measures over the same study period suggests a greater early warning capacity of the approach. The authors also exploited the integrated way of measuring expected losses to generate a market-implied measure of capital adequacy (MCAR). This measure of “shadow capital adequacy” indicated whether estimated expected losses—individually and jointly—were consistent with the default risk implied by the accounting-based capital adequacy ratio reported by sample banks. Hence, this distribution-based perspective of market-implied solvency risk can inform a system-wide capital adequacy assessment that reflects the variability of both assets and liabilities at different levels of statistical confidence.

    The results showed that market-based measures of systemic risk can effectively complement prudential reporting in informing a more comprehensive assessment of capital adequacy by considering the impact of changes in market conditions on the perceived risk profile of banks. This has become increasingly relevant due to fundamental changes in the market assessment of banks’ solvency risk following the global financial crisis. Investors are now more uncertain about the value of banks’ net assets and of the underlying asset risks. Low market values may also reflect weak or uncertain profits, or high equity risk premia. The contribution of each factor is not entirely independent and will vary by bank. Going forward, further refinements to the model are possible, including various simulation approaches. 

     

    Related Link: Working Paper

     

    Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Systemic Risk, Shadow Capital Adequacy, Research, Capital Adequacy, Solvency Risk, BoE

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    APRA Updates Lists of Validation and Derivation Rules in December 2019

    APRA updated the lists of the Direct to APRA (D2A) validation and derivation rules for authorized deposit-taking institutions, insurers, and superannuation entities.

    December 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Finalizes Prudential Standard for Credit Risk Management of Banks

    APRA updated the prudential standard on credit risk management requirements (APS 220) for authorized deposit-taking institutions, post a public consultation.

    December 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Consults on Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance

    EIOPA issued a consultation on guidelines on the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) security and governance by insurers.

    December 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS Consults on Design of Prudential Treatment for Crypto-Assets

    BCBS published a discussion paper on the design of prudential treatment for crypto-asset exposures of banks.

    December 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    NCUA Approves Delay of Risk-Based Capital Rules Until January 2022

    The NCUA Board held its eleventh open meeting of 2019 and approved a final rule to delay the effective date of the risk-based capital rules for credit unions to January 01, 2022.

    December 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Issues Operational Risk Rules, Consults on Reporting Requirements

    APRA published an updated prudential standard APS 115 that sets out operational risk requirements for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.

    December 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESMA Updates Q&A on European Benchmarks Regulation in December 2019

    ESMA updated the question and answers (Q&A) document on the European Benchmarks Regulation.

    December 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Decides to Keep Countercyclical Capital Buffer for Banks at 0%

    APRA announced its decision to keep the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for authorized deposit-taking institutions on hold at zero percent.

    December 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESMA on Draft Amendments to Indices and Recognized Exchanges Under CRR

    ESMA issued the final report on draft amendments to the Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1646, which specifies the main indices and recognized exchanges, under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), that are relevant to credit institutions and investment firms subject to prudential requirements and trading venues.

    December 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Extends Consultation Period for Capital Requirements for Insurers

    FED is extending comment period for the proposed rule establishing risk-based capital requirements for depository institution holding companies that are significantly engaged in insurance activities.

    December 10, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 4316