September 10, 2018

BIS published a speech by Fritz Zurbrügg of SNB, wherein he discussed the causes and effects of “too big to fail” (TBTF) and how it manifests itself in Switzerland, before moving on to discuss the reasons the banking regulation before the crisis did not sufficiently address the risks posed by TBTF or systemically important banks. He also described the country’s implementation status regarding the wide-ranging regulatory measures taken at international and national levels to resolve TBTF. He believes that the Swiss big banks and the Swiss banking system are much more “weatherproof” today than they were ten years ago.

As per Mr. Zurbrügg, in Switzerland, the response was quick, targeted, and cost-effective. The regulatory amendments strengthened the resilience of banks and introduced measures to ensure that even a systemically important bank can exit the market in an orderly way in the event of a crisis. Although many of the planned measures have already been implemented, the conditions for resolving TBTF in Switzerland will be in place only after the agreed measures have been fully implemented. With regard to the regulatory response to the TBTF issue, he explained that Swiss regulations in this area rest on two complementary pillars with special requirements for systemically important banks. The first pillar defines measures to strengthen the resilience of these banks and thus reduce the likelihood of a systemically important bank getting into financial distress. The second pillar of the TBTF regulations comes into play in the event that a systemically important bank gets into financial distress, despite increased resilience. It is intended to ensure that a bank is resolvable. For this purpose, the regulations stipulate requirements for resolution planning. By the end of 2019, systemically important banks in Switzerland must prepare “emergency plans” to be able to continue their systemically important functions in Switzerland without interruption in the event of a crisis. The second pillar also specifies requirements for loss-absorbing capacity. Banks can use “bail-in” instruments for this purpose. These are essentially debt securities that can be converted into equity or written down in the event of impending insolvency. 

Regarding the status of the fulfillment of these requirements, the latest Financial Stability Report, which was published in June, stated that implementation is already well under way. In terms of the first pillar of the regulations—both big banks are on track. They fully meet the requirements for risk-weighted capital that will apply from the end of 2019. As far as the second pillar—resolution—is concerned, the two big banks (UBS and Credit Suisse) have made further progress. They already meet some of the requirements in full, namely those related to the gone-concern loss-absorbing capacity. However, more progress needs to be made in increasing resilience with regard to the leverage ratio. The work that still needs to be done under the second pillar should not be underestimated. To ensure that a bank can be resolved in an emergency, further progress is needed, particularly in three areas. First, resolution funding plans need to be drawn up, which FINMA, as the competent authority, is in the process of doing. Second, loss-absorbing capacity must be ensured at the level of each individual entity within the big banks. Previously, the focus was on loss-absorbing capacity at consolidated group level. Third, both big banks must further reduce the financial and operational dependencies within the group. In addition, the two big banks need to finalize the required emergency plans for Swiss institutions with systemically important functions by the end of 2019.

He concluded: “We are confident that full implementation of the Swiss ‘too big to fail’ regulations will reduce the false incentives that underlie the issue and create the necessary conditions for resolving the issue here in Switzerland. The state should no longer be obliged to use government funds to bail out a bank.”

 

Related Link: Speech

Keywords: Europe, Switzerland, Banking, TBTF, Systemic Risk, Resolution Planning, TLAC, Leverage Ratio, SNB, BIS

Related Articles
News

BoE, FCA, and MAS Announce Collaboration on Cyber Security

MAS and UK financial authorities (BoE and FCA) announced that they will work together to strengthen cyber security in their financial sectors.

June 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

CBIRC Advisory Committee Holds Meeting, Discusses Regulatory Issues

The first meeting of the International Advisory Committee (IAC) of CBIRC was held in Shanghai from June 11 to 12, 2019.

June 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

APRA Response to Proposal on Revisions to Capital Framework for Banks

APRA published a paper in response to the first round of consultation on proposed changes to the capital framework for authorized deposit-taking institutions.

June 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

APRA Finalizes Schedule on Scope of Variable Remuneration Under BEAR

APRA has released a response letter and the final wording of the schedule in relation to how the Banking Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR) applies to variable remuneration arrangements for medium and small authorized deposit-taking institutions (ADIs).

June 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EC Publishes Fourth Progress Report on Reduction of NPLs in EU Banks

EC published the fourth progress report on the reduction of non-performing loans (NPLs) in banks in EU.

June 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FASB Adds Taxonomy Entry Points in Relation to 2019 DEI Taxonomy

FASB has incorporated additional entry points for the 2019 GAAP [Generally Accepted Accounting Principles] Financial Reporting Taxonomy and the 2019 SEC Reporting Taxonomy, in connection with the issuance of the 2019 Document and Entity Information (DEI) Taxonomy by SEC.

June 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EC Publishes Draft Equivalence Decisions for Credit Rating Agencies

EC is requesting feedback on the draft implementing decisions on recognition of legal and supervisory systems of Hong Kong, Japan, Mexico, and U.S. as equivalent to the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on credit rating agencies.

June 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BaFin Consults on AFS Recommendation to Increase CCyB for Banks

BaFin is requesting feedback on increasing the domestic countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) to 0.25%, with effect from July 01, 2019, pursuant to Article 92(3) of Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).

June 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

MAS Revises Capital Adequacy Requirements for Banks in Singapore

MAS issued amendments to the Notice 637 on risk-based capital adequacy requirements for banks incorporated in Singapore.

June 10, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA on Modification by Consent of Definition of Capital Rules in CRR 2

PRA announced its decision to offer a modification by consent of the Rules 7.1 and 7.5 of the Definition of Capital Part of the PRA Rulebook.

June 10, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3238