Featured Product

    Fritz Zurbrügg of SNB on Mitigation of Systemic Risk in Switzerland

    September 10, 2018

    BIS published a speech by Fritz Zurbrügg of SNB, wherein he discussed the causes and effects of “too big to fail” (TBTF) and how it manifests itself in Switzerland, before moving on to discuss the reasons the banking regulation before the crisis did not sufficiently address the risks posed by TBTF or systemically important banks. He also described the country’s implementation status regarding the wide-ranging regulatory measures taken at international and national levels to resolve TBTF. He believes that the Swiss big banks and the Swiss banking system are much more “weatherproof” today than they were ten years ago.

    As per Mr. Zurbrügg, in Switzerland, the response was quick, targeted, and cost-effective. The regulatory amendments strengthened the resilience of banks and introduced measures to ensure that even a systemically important bank can exit the market in an orderly way in the event of a crisis. Although many of the planned measures have already been implemented, the conditions for resolving TBTF in Switzerland will be in place only after the agreed measures have been fully implemented. With regard to the regulatory response to the TBTF issue, he explained that Swiss regulations in this area rest on two complementary pillars with special requirements for systemically important banks. The first pillar defines measures to strengthen the resilience of these banks and thus reduce the likelihood of a systemically important bank getting into financial distress. The second pillar of the TBTF regulations comes into play in the event that a systemically important bank gets into financial distress, despite increased resilience. It is intended to ensure that a bank is resolvable. For this purpose, the regulations stipulate requirements for resolution planning. By the end of 2019, systemically important banks in Switzerland must prepare “emergency plans” to be able to continue their systemically important functions in Switzerland without interruption in the event of a crisis. The second pillar also specifies requirements for loss-absorbing capacity. Banks can use “bail-in” instruments for this purpose. These are essentially debt securities that can be converted into equity or written down in the event of impending insolvency. 

    Regarding the status of the fulfillment of these requirements, the latest Financial Stability Report, which was published in June, stated that implementation is already well under way. In terms of the first pillar of the regulations—both big banks are on track. They fully meet the requirements for risk-weighted capital that will apply from the end of 2019. As far as the second pillar—resolution—is concerned, the two big banks (UBS and Credit Suisse) have made further progress. They already meet some of the requirements in full, namely those related to the gone-concern loss-absorbing capacity. However, more progress needs to be made in increasing resilience with regard to the leverage ratio. The work that still needs to be done under the second pillar should not be underestimated. To ensure that a bank can be resolved in an emergency, further progress is needed, particularly in three areas. First, resolution funding plans need to be drawn up, which FINMA, as the competent authority, is in the process of doing. Second, loss-absorbing capacity must be ensured at the level of each individual entity within the big banks. Previously, the focus was on loss-absorbing capacity at consolidated group level. Third, both big banks must further reduce the financial and operational dependencies within the group. In addition, the two big banks need to finalize the required emergency plans for Swiss institutions with systemically important functions by the end of 2019.

    He concluded: “We are confident that full implementation of the Swiss ‘too big to fail’ regulations will reduce the false incentives that underlie the issue and create the necessary conditions for resolving the issue here in Switzerland. The state should no longer be obliged to use government funds to bail out a bank.”

     

    Related Link: Speech

    Keywords: Europe, Switzerland, Banking, TBTF, Systemic Risk, Resolution Planning, TLAC, Leverage Ratio, SNB, BIS

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    FSB Publishes List of Global Systemically Important Banks for 2019

    FSB published the 2019 list of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), using the end-2018 data and an assessment methodology designed by BCBS.

    November 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Publishes Roadmap on Risk Reduction Measures Package

    EBA published a set of roadmaps outlining the approach and timelines for delivering the mandates stemming from the Risk Reduction Measures Package adopted by the European Council and European Parliament on May 20, 2019.

    November 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Consults on Initial Reporting Requirements for Market Risk

    EBA launched a consultation on the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting requirements for market risk.

    November 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Proposes to Extend Initial Compliance Dates Under SCCL Rule

    FED published a proposal to extend, by 18 months, the initial compliance dates for foreign banks subject to the single-counterparty credit limit (SCCL) rule.

    November 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    CBIRC to Strengthen Supervisory and Policy Support for SME Services

    CBIRC released a notification on strengthening supervision and guidance to enhance the quality and efficiency of financial services for "small and micro-enterprises" (SMEs).

    November 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Adopts Proposal to Implement Reporting Form for SCCL

    FED adopted a proposal to implement the Single-Counterparty Credit Limits (SCCL) reporting form FR 2590.

    November 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Publishes Approach to Regulating and Supervising GCRA Risks

    APRA published an information paper that sets out a more intensive regulatory approach to transform governance, culture, remuneration, and accountability (GCRA) practices across the prudentially regulated financial sector.

    November 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    US Agencies Update Rule on Derivative Contracts Exposure Calculation

    US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) announced a final rule updating the way certain banking organizations are required to measure counterparty credit risk for derivative contracts under their regulatory capital rules.

    November 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    US Agencies Finalize Rule to Amend Treatment of HVCRE Exposures

    US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) finalized a rule to modify the treatment of high volatility commercial real estate (HVCRE) exposures, as required by the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection (EGRRCP) Act.

    November 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    US Agencies Finalize Changes to Rule on Supplementary Leverage Ratio

    US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) finalized changes to the capital requirement for banking organizations predominantly engaged in custodial activities, as required by the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection (EGRRCP) Act.

    November 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 4177