The Federal Reserve System (FED) published a paper describing the landscape of partnerships between community banks and fintech companies. The paper captures insights gathered from extensive outreach with community banks, fintech companies, and other stakeholders. It focuses on the benefits and risks of different partnership types and the key considerations for engaging in such partnerships, before moving on to discuss the key elements of success as stated by outreach participants. The paper highlights that the three key considerations in establishing effective partnerships are commitment to innovation, alignment in priorities and objectives, and the approach to connectivity.
Community banks serve businesses and consumers throughout the country, in both rural and urban areas, and are leading providers of credit to small businesses. For this paper, community banks can be defined as those with less than USD 10 billion in assets. Fintech partnerships are broadly defined in this paper as partnerships undertaken to improve or expand an aspect of bank operations, technology infrastructure, or products and services. Fintech partnerships include a range of relationship structures, including traditional vendor partnerships where a bank receives a service from the third party and exclusive arrangements in which the community bank and fintech share objectives and outcomes. The three types of partnerships that emerged during the outreach discussions are operational technology partnerships, customer-oriented partnerships, and front-end financial technology partnerships. The outreach effort identified the following three key considerations in establishing such partnerships effectively:
- Commitment to innovation. Community banks that have committed to innovation expressed that their senior management and boards of directors are prepared to make meaningful investments of time and resources in technology. Before making investments in technology, leadership identifies the problem to be solved and the gains they hope to realize from these investments, often using key performance indicators and concrete goals.
- Alignment in priorities and objectives. This alignment between the fintech and the community bank—which participants viewed as the foundation for building and maintaining effective partnerships—can include but is not limited to agreement on the appropriate use of customer data, the establishment of effective risk management standards, mutual emphasis on compliance with bank regulation, and a shared belief in the importance of frequent and direct communication.
- Thoughtful approach to connectivity. Community banks that have thoughtfully approached connectivity with fintech companies have considered trade-offs across flexibility, cost, breadth of partner selection, and convenience before establishing technical connections. Connections with fintech companies are considered part of an integrated process where information can flow across systems and siloed bank processes are eliminated, where possible.
The outreach effort suggests that application programming interfaces (APIs) are gaining popularity among community banks as a data transfer solution, though some community banks prefer solutions that are more easily integrated into their existing technical infrastructure. Several core providers have established, or are in the process of establishing, APIs with specific third parties and some bankers expressed that they feel most comfortable using APIs their core provider has developed. Bankers also noted that their core providers were able to build customized APIs for third parties upon request or provided open APIs to which third parties could build connections. While some bankers felt this option was most convenient, they noted that these arrangements could be costly and may be inflexible. Other bankers explored partnerships with fintech companies or developed technical infrastructure without significant input from their core providers, including through customized APIs. They expressed that these solutions could simplify and accelerate the process of partnering with multiple fintech companies and they found the relatively wide selection of potential partners appealing. Banks, however, vary in their approaches to these considerations. For example, one bank built an API between its third-party loan platform and its core provider, other banks bundled activity from an API architecture provider and posted those flows to their core at a regular frequency, and yet others invested in a central data repository that could combine data flows from distinct silos.
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Community Banks, Regtech, Operational Risk, Third Party Risk, Reputational Risk, API, Fintech Applications, FED
Previous ArticleAPRA Finalizes Guidance on Management of Climate Change Risks
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued principles for the effective management and supervision of climate-related financial risks.