APRA published final versions of the prudential standard APS 220 on credit quality and the reporting standard ARS 923.2 on repayment deferrals. The reporting standard ARS 923.2 outlines the requirements for provision of information on loan repayment deferrals by an authorized deposit-taking institution. Both these standards have been published in the Federal Register of Legislation and are now in force. APRA also issued a letter to the authorized deposit-taking institutions, outlining its response to the consultation on formalizing capital measures and reporting requirements for loans impacted by COVID-19 outbreak.
Earlier, in August 2020, APRA had proposed to give effect to the temporary capital treatment of loans with repayment deferrals or restructuring due to COVID-19 by way of adjustments to APS 220. APRA had also proposed to promote public transparency by collecting and publishing entity-level data on loans impacted by COVID-19, through a new reporting standard ARS 923.2. APRA has received seven submissions in response to its consultation—all of which APRA has published. Respondents broadly supported the proposal to adjust APS 220 but sought clarification on the scope of loans eligible for the temporary capital treatment. Respondents also requested flexibility in the application of the temporary measures, particularly the treatment of restructuring and counting of arrears. In response to the request for additional flexibility for restructuring, APRA has removed the requirement under paragraph 8 of Attachment E to APS 220, which states that loans may only be restructured once. In relation to the counting of arrears, paragraph 7 has been amended to clarify that an authorized deposit-taking institution may reset the arrears count to zero where it modifies the loan to adjust for the deferral period and any existing arrears.
Additionally, respondents generally supported the proposal to collect and publish entity-level data on COVID-19 impacted loans through a new Reporting Standard, ARS 923.2. The key area of focus in submissions was reducing the reporting burden on industry, particularly for smaller authorized deposit-taking institutions. Respondents suggested that APRA should consider extending the reporting timeframe and reduce duplication with other data requests. Respondents also sought more clarity on specific data reporting items and the expectations for additional self-disclosures. To help reduce the reporting burden for smaller authorized deposit-taking institutions, APRA is:
- Increasing the publication threshold from AUD 10 million in total loans subject to repayment deferral to AUD 20 million. Where authorized deposit-taking institutions fall below the AUD 20 million threshold, they will be asked, from September, to provide ARF 923.2 on a quarterly rather than a monthly basis.
- Clarifying that, for non-listed authorized deposit-taking institutions, its expectations of public disclosures on loan repayment deferrals will be met by way of the APRA publication. APRA expects that listed authorized deposit-taking institutions will make additional information publicly available.
- Continuing to review and engage with industry on additional ways in which APRA can minimize the reporting burden during the COVID-19 period. This includes the recent extension of the due date from 10 to 15 business days for authorized deposit-taking institutions to report data on ARF 923.0 on credit and capital and the temporary pausing and review of ARF 923.1 on provisioning.
APRA is, however, maintaining the requirement for authorized deposit-taking institutions to report data on ARF 923.2 within 10 business days after the end of the reporting period to which the information relates. In response to the industry concerns over reporting duplication, APRA clarified that the data used for the entity-level publication will be taken from the existing ARF 923.2 returns.
Effective Date: September 09, 2020
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, COVID-19, Credit Risk, Loan Moratorium, Regulatory Capital, Reporting, Basel, APS 220, ARS 923.2, Payment Deferrals, APRA
Previous ArticleNGFS Advocates Environmental Risk Analysis for Financial Sector
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.
EBA published the annual report on asset encumbrance of banks in EU.
FED updated the reporting form and instructions for the FR Y-9C report on consolidated financial statements for holding companies.
EBA issued a consultation paper on the guidelines on monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects of the establishment of intermediate EU parent undertakings, or IPUs, as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive.
EC published Regulation 2021/25 that addresses amendments related to the financial reporting consequences of replacement of the existing interest rate benchmarks with alternative reference rates.
BIS published a bulletin, or a note, that examines the cyber threat landscape in the context of the pandemic and discusses policies to reduce risks to financial stability.
HM Treasury, also known as HMT, has updated the table containing the list of the equivalence decisions that came into effect in UK at the end of the transition period of its withdrawal from EU.
EBA published an erratum for technical package on phase 1 of the reporting framework 3.0.
APRA updated a frequently asked question (FAQ), for authorized deposit-taking institutions, on the measurement of credit risk weighted assets.
ECB published a letter from Andrea Enria, the Chair of the Supervisory Board of ECB, answering questions raised by the President of the Bundestag (the German federal parliament) on how ECB assesses the financial stability of the euro area in the context of the significant level of nonperforming loans.