Pentti Hakkarainen of ECB Outlines Work Needed to Tackle Climate Risks
Pentti Hakkarainen of ECB spoke, at the Hannes Snellman Financial Law Seminar in Helsinki, about the climate change risks faced by banks and the work that lies ahead for regulators, supervisors, and banks. Banking supervisors must deal with the risks that climate change poses to banks and must raise awareness among banks. He suggested that the climate change risks must be better understood and ways must be found to mitigate them. He also emphasized that banks need to approach climate risks from the angle of risk management and more work needs to be done in this area.
Mr. Hakkarainen classified the climate-related risks into physical and transition risks. Physical risks directly arise from a changing climate while the transition risks arise from the potential shift to a more sustainable economy. These risks are spread unevenly and are complex, chaotic, and non-linear. Transition risks are greater for some sectors and regions than for others. Moreover, the risks span "a very long time horizon" as these changes will happen over decades. However, the risk models used by banks and regulators cover much shorter time frames and this means that there might be blind spots. The 2019 risk map of ECB for the banking sector features, for the first time, climate risk as one of the key risks for the European banking sector. Nonetheless, more needs to be learned about these risks in terms of how to measure and mitigate them. He also discussed the following items on the to-do list of banking supervision:
- First, there is the issue of “green” assets. These are generating some hype and demand is growing fast. However, the definition of green assets is unclear and "a common and precise definition" is needed. EC has made a proposal on defining sustainable assets, which is now being discussed. This proposal just classifies “green” assets though. To get the full picture, “brown” assets will also need to be classified.
- Second, climate risks need to be integrated into the supervisory framework. In this respect, EBA has the legal mandate to propose an approach. This proposal will focus on the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process or SREP—the main tool of supervisors. Supervisors also need to think about how banks should disclose climate risks. Here, approaches differ across countries and need to be harmonized.
- Third, coming back to “green” and “brown” assets, their respective risks need to be better understood. It is risks that determine how supervisors and regulators treat these assets. EBA will work on this over the coming years.
These are just a few of the items on the to-do list. However, given the scope of the challenge and its complexity, no one can solve it alone. Regulators, supervisors, and central banks have joined forces in a Network for Greening the Financial System. This network comprises 42 members worldwide, including the ECB and eight observers. It is encouraging that so many institutions share a common understanding of these problems and have joined forces to come up with solutions. To understand the way banks approach climate risks, ECB recently surveyed a sample of banks. It was found that banks are very much aware of climate change. So far, they have approached the topic from the angle of corporate social responsibility, but they also see the need to approach it from the angle of risk management. In this area too, more work needs to be done.
Related Link: Speech
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Climate Change Risk, Banking Supervision, SREP, Green Assets, EBA, ESG, ECB
Related Articles
News
APRA Updates Lists of Validation and Derivation Rules in December 2019APRA updated the lists of the Direct to APRA (D2A) validation and derivation rules for authorized deposit-taking institutions, insurers, and superannuation entities.
December 13, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
News
APRA Finalizes Prudential Standard for Credit Risk Management of BanksAPRA updated the prudential standard on credit risk management requirements (APS 220) for authorized deposit-taking institutions, post a public consultation.
December 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
News
EIOPA Consults on Guidelines on ICT Security and GovernanceEIOPA issued a consultation on guidelines on the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) security and governance by insurers.
December 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
News
BCBS Consults on Design of Prudential Treatment for Crypto-AssetsBCBS published a discussion paper on the design of prudential treatment for crypto-asset exposures of banks.
December 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
News
NCUA Approves Delay of Risk-Based Capital Rules Until January 2022The NCUA Board held its eleventh open meeting of 2019 and approved a final rule to delay the effective date of the risk-based capital rules for credit unions to January 01, 2022.
December 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
News
APRA Issues Operational Risk Rules, Consults on Reporting RequirementsAPRA published an updated prudential standard APS 115 that sets out operational risk requirements for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
December 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
News
ESMA Updates Q&A on European Benchmarks Regulation in December 2019ESMA updated the question and answers (Q&A) document on the European Benchmarks Regulation.
December 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
News
APRA Decides to Keep Countercyclical Capital Buffer for Banks at 0%APRA announced its decision to keep the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for authorized deposit-taking institutions on hold at zero percent.
December 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
News
ESMA on Draft Amendments to Indices and Recognized Exchanges Under CRRESMA issued the final report on draft amendments to the Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1646, which specifies the main indices and recognized exchanges, under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), that are relevant to credit institutions and investment firms subject to prudential requirements and trading venues.
December 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
News
FED Extends Consultation Period for Capital Requirements for InsurersFED is extending comment period for the proposed rule establishing risk-based capital requirements for depository institution holding companies that are significantly engaged in insurance activities.
December 10, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|