Featured Product

    IOSCO on Compliance of Credit-Sensitive Rate with Benchmark Principles

    September 08, 2021

    The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) published a statement reiterating the importance of continued transition to robust alternative financial benchmarks—that is, risk-free rates—to mitigate potential risks arising from the cessation of LIBOR, including the USD LIBOR. The IOSCO also notes that the alternative financial benchmarks will need to be compliant with the IOSCO Principles on Financial Benchmarks. It also notes that credit-sensitive rates that are interest rate benchmarks that measure the credit risk component of unsecured borrowing in certain markets have started to emerge as a possible alternative to the USD LIBOR. IOSCO highlights that alternative financial benchmarks need to be compliant with the IOSCO Principles on Financial Benchmarks. With respect to the credit-sensitive rates, IOSCO calls for greater attention to Principles 6 and 7.

    Principle 6 asks administrators to consider the “relative size of the underlying market in relation to the volume of trading.” Principle 7 emphasizes “data sufficiency in a benchmark’s design to accurately and reliably represent the underlying market” measured by the benchmark. Therefore, in line with the Principles 6 and 7, IOSCO calls on administrators to assess whether the systemic benchmarks that are used extensively are based on active markets with high volumes of transactions, representing the underlying interest they intend to measure and whether such benchmarks are resilient during times of stress. Regulators are concerned that some shortcomings of LIBOR may be replicated through the use of credit-sensitive rates that lack sufficient underlying transaction volumes.

    In its statement, IOSDCO notes that the disproportionality between the low/modest volume of transactions underlying credit-sensitive rates and the increasingly higher volumes of activity in markets referencing them (inverted pyramid problem) raises concerns about market integrity, conduct risks, and financial stability risks. The decline in the underlying activity of some of the credit-sensitive rates during stress periods, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, raises additional regulatory concerns. Therefore, benchmark administrators of credit-sensitive rates should consider how their benchmarks would continue to meet Principles 6 and 7 over time, in case use of a benchmark becomes widespread. Some of these rates are based on markets similar to LIBOR and may replicate many shortcomings of LIBOR, as highlighted by the authorities in the US and the UK. Users of benchmarks should also consider the robustness and reliability of the benchmarks they choose and ensure that they have reliable fallback mechanisms that can be used, in case their chosen benchmarks cease or become unrepresentative.

    IOSCO supports the recent remarks of the Financial Stability Board (FSB) that "to ensure financial stability, benchmarks which are used extensively must be especially robust." Widespread use of, and transition to, credit-sensitive rates, instead of the U.S. Alternative Reference Rates Committee’s preferred Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR), may therefore pose risks to financial stability. The IOSCO Board notes that SOFR provides a robust rate suitable for use in most products, with underlying transaction volumes that are unmatched by other alternatives. Users of benchmarks place considerable value on a benchmark being IOSCO compliant. To continue to give market confidence in the reliability and integrity of financial benchmarks, IOSCO will closely monitor how the IOSCO badge is used in compliance assessments of the relevant credit-sensitive rates.


    Related Links

    Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, Interest Rate Benchmark, Credit Sensitive Rate, Benchmark Reforms, Risk Free Rate, LIBOR, USD LIBOR, SOFR, Derivatives, IOSCO

    Related Articles

    EBA Clarifies Use of COVID-19-Impacted Data for IRB Credit Risk Models

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.

    June 21, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    BIS Hub Updates Work Program for 2022, Announces New Projects

    The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.

    June 17, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    US Senate Members Seek Details on SEC Proposed Climate Disclosure Rule

    Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

    June 16, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    EIOPA Consults on Review of Securitization Framework in Solvency II

    The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.

    June 16, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    UK Authorities Issue Regulatory and Reporting Updates for Banks

    The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.

    June 15, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    BaFin Consults on Resolvability Requirements for Resolution Planning

    The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority of Germany (BaFin) proposed to amend the “Capital Investment Conduct And Organization Ordinance” and issued a draft circular on the minimum resolvability requirements for resolution planning.

    June 10, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    EBA Consults on Certain Standards and Guidelines Under CRR and BRRD

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed guidelines, for the resolution authorities, on the publication of the write-down and conversion and bail-in exchange mechanic, with the comment period ending on September 07, 2022.

    June 08, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    OJK Publishes Regulatory Updates for Financial Sector Entities

    The Financial Services Authority of Indonesia (OJK) is strengthening cooperation with the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Japanese Financial Services Agency (JFSA)

    June 03, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    EU Publishes Rules on DLT and Data Governance

    The European Parliament and the Council published Regulation 2022/868 on European data governance (Data Governance Act).

    June 03, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    EBA Publishes Phase 2 of Reporting Framework 3.2

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) published phase 2 of its reporting framework 3.2. The technical package supports the implementation of the updated reporting framework by providing standard specifications

    June 03, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 8267