Featured Product

    OSFI Identifies Focus Areas to Strengthen Third-Party Risk Management

    September 08, 2020

    OSFI published the key findings of a study on third-party risk management. The study was conducted in 2019-20 among 55 federally regulated financial institutions, with 47% of them being deposit-taking institutions and the remaining being the insurance institutions. As a result of this study, OSFI has identified five focal points for effective management of third-party risk: risk assessment, monitoring and incident management, data security and access, continuity of critical operations, and cloud risk management. For further insights on the perspectives and work of OSFI in this area, OSFI will soon release a discussion paper on technology risk, which includes a segment on third-party risk.

    The federally regulated financial institutions frequently cite third-party risk as a top or key risk due to the increasing engagement with, and reliance on, third parties. The following are the key insights that OSFI derived from the study on the third-party risk management:

    • Risk Assessment—Prudent risk management involves focusing on the highest risks at certain providers while providing adequate oversight for providers with lower risk profiles. Developing risk management frameworks with a range of risk categories can help federally regulated financial institutions to more effectively manage the risk from third parties.
    • Monitoring and Incident Management—Establishing a process to regularly monitor risks against desired standards and measures can help federally regulated financial institutions to more effectively identify whether and when a third party is creating risk. The results highlight that 36% of the respondents indicated that they maintained a watchlist—that is, a list of third parties identified for enhanced monitoring. Reasons cited to maintain a watchlist include criticality and significance to the operations of a federally regulated financial institution and elevated risks of financial, operational, or reputational damage to the federally regulated financial institution.
    • Data Security and Access—Lack of adequate controls and monitoring of third-party access, storage, and use of federally regulated financial institution information may expose federally regulated financial institutions to higher risk of data breaches and loss of confidentiality. Security risk assessments are the first step in protecting federally regulated financial institution data as these can aid federally regulated financial institutions understanding if the risk is being sufficiently managed by the third party. The results highlight that 83% of the respondents cite information security controls and performance as the top assessment factor during the due diligence phase prior to onboarding a third party. While 86% of the respondents include information security controls and performance in due diligence refreshes, 23% perform real-time security monitoring of third parties.
    • Continuity of Critical Operations—Identifying critical third-party dependencies and conducting joint exercises with these parties can help to develop and reinforce the recovery processes, communication channels, authority levels, and trusted relationships that are necessary to work cohesively and collaboratively through a disruption. There were 17 respondents with the management of critical third parties in scope of the study. The results highlight that 53% of the respondents have business continuity plans, recovery time objectives, and service-level agreements for critical services in place with third parties while 82% have established specific recovery time objectives and recovery point objectives with third parties for critical business services. 
    • Cloud Risk Management—Cloud adoption has moved past proof-of-concept testing and toward an established or emerging practice of assessment and onboarding at federally regulated financial institutions. While managing cloud services is a shared responsibility between the federally regulated financial institution and the cloud service provider, developing cloud-specific standards may enable federally regulated financial institutions to increase interoperability and optimize cloud adoption while operating within the federally regulated financial institution's risk appetite and tolerances. There were eight respondents with cloud risk management in the scope of the study. The results provide data related to cloud adoption challenges, challenges in cloud computing operations, and cloud availability and exit strategy.

     

    Related Link: Results of Study (PDF)

     

    Keywords: Americas, Canada, Banking, Insurance, Third-Party Risk, Cloud Computing, Outsourcing Arrangements, Technology Risk, Fintech, Regtech

    Related Articles
    News

    ESAs Publish Reporting Templates for Financial Conglomerates

    ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.

    January 18, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Publishes Report on Asset Encumbrance of Banks in EU

    EBA published the annual report on asset encumbrance of banks in EU.

    January 18, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Proposes Guidelines for Establishing Intermediate Parent Entities

    EBA issued a consultation paper on the guidelines on monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects of the establishment of intermediate EU parent undertakings, or IPUs, as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive.

    January 15, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    US Agencies Publish Updates for Call Reports, FFIEC 101, and FR Y-9C

    FED updated the reporting form and instructions for the FR Y-9C report on consolidated financial statements for holding companies.

    January 15, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Adopts Financial Reporting Changes Arising from Benchmark Reforms

    EC published Regulation 2021/25 that addresses amendments related to the financial reporting consequences of replacement of the existing interest rate benchmarks with alternative reference rates.

    January 14, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Bulletin Examines Key Elements of Policy Response to Cyber Risk

    BIS published a bulletin, or a note, that examines the cyber threat landscape in the context of the pandemic and discusses policies to reduce risks to financial stability.

    January 14, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HMT Updates List of Post-Brexit Equivalence Decisions in UK

    HM Treasury, also known as HMT, has updated the table containing the list of the equivalence decisions that came into effect in UK at the end of the transition period of its withdrawal from EU.

    January 14, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Issues Erratum for Technical Package on Reporting Framework 3.0

    EBA published an erratum for technical package on phase 1 of the reporting framework 3.0.

    January 14, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Publishes FAQ on Measurement of Credit Risk Weighted Assets

    APRA updated a frequently asked question (FAQ), for authorized deposit-taking institutions, on the measurement of credit risk weighted assets.

    January 14, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Publishes Risk Dashboard for Third Quarter of 2020

    EBA published the quarterly risk dashboard, along with the results of the Risk Assessment Questionnaire survey among 60 banks and 15 market analysts.

    January 13, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 6448