Featured Product

    BoE Paper Examines Impact of Different Supervisory Governance Models

    September 06, 2019

    BoE published a staff working paper that examines the impact of different supervisory governance models on supervisory capture and financial stability. The paper compares supervisory governance models based on supervision by the central bank, by an agency, or by both the central bank and an agency. The paper provides empirical evidence on the relationship between supervisory governance and financial stability and on the inhibiting effect of shared supervision on supervisory capture. The analysis of the impact of the supervisory governance models on nonperforming loans (NPLs) found that NPLs are significantly lower in countries where supervision is shared and the risk of supervisory capture is higher.

    Using the database on supervisory governance in 116 countries from 1970 to 2016, the paper finds that supervisory governance does not significantly affect NPLs. However, it also finds that, where the risk of capture is high, shared supervision is associated with a significant reduction in NPLs. NPLs tend to be higher when supervision is conducted by the central bank as a single supervisor, whereas no significant relationship is found with supervision by an agency. This is in line with the supervisory capture theory, wherein it is more costly to capture two supervisors rather than one. Assigning supervisory responsibilities to two institutions rather than one, reduces the risk of supervisory capture, thus lowering the risk-taking behavior of banks. Under shared supervision, each supervisor faces higher informational asymmetries and holds only partial information on the banking system, making it less profitable for supervised banks to capture them. On the contrary, having a single banking supervisor makes capture more likely, allowing banks to take more risk, with negative implications for financial stability. Overall, these results provide new evidence in support of the relevance of supervisory governance in hampering supervisory capture from the banking sector.

    In conclusion, the paper suggests that reforms in supervisory governance could have an impact only depending on the institutional setting in which they are implemented. Institutional factors, such as the risk of capture in a country, are able to influence the effectiveness of supervisory governance in keeping the banking system stable. If policy makers want to address reforms in the governance of banking supervision, they should be aware that success of their efforts will be conditional on the existing political economy setting in which the reform is undertaken. 

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Financial Stability, Supervisory Governance, NPLs, Banking Supervision, BoE

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    EBA Publishes Phase 2 of Technical Package on Reporting Framework 2.10

    EBA published phase 2 of the technical package on the reporting framework 2.10, providing the technical tools and specifications for implementation of EBA reporting requirements.

    July 10, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FASB Proposes to Delay Implementation of Insurance Contracts Standard

    FASB issued a proposed Accounting Standards Update that would grant insurance companies, adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, an additional year to implement the Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-12 on targeted improvements to accounting for long-duration insurance contracts, or LDTI (Topic 944).

    July 09, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Updates Regulatory Approach to Loan Deferrals Amid COVID Crisis

    APRA updated the regulatory approach for loans subject to repayment deferrals amid the COVID-19 crisis.

    July 09, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS and FSB Set Out Recommendations for Benchmark Transition

    BCBS and FSB published a report on supervisory issues associated with benchmark transition.

    July 09, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    IAIS Sets Out Recommendations for Benchmark Transition for Insurers

    IAIS published a report on supervisory issues associated with benchmark transition from an insurance perspective.

    July 09, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESMA Updates Reporting Manual on European Single Electronic Format

    ESMA updated the reporting manual on the European Single Electronic Format (ESEF).

    July 09, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Calls on Resolution Authorities to Consider Impact of COVID Crisis

    EBA published a statement on resolution planning in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    July 09, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS Finalizes Revisions to Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework

    BCBS Finalizes Revisions to Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework

    July 08, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Guideline on Materiality Threshold for Credit Obligations Past Due

    ECB published a guideline (2020/97), in the Official Journal of European Union, on the definition of materiality threshold for credit obligations past due for less significant institutions.

    July 08, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Temporarily Revises FR Y-14 With Respect to PPP and CARES Act

    FED temporarily revised the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

    July 08, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 5458