Featured Product

    Peter Praet of ECB on Enabling Pan European Banks in Banking Union

    September 05, 2018

    While speaking at the Eurofi Financial Forum 2018 in Vienna, Peter Praet of ECB talked about creating an enabling environment for pan-European banks in the Banking Union. He highlights that, in recent years, the European Union has achieved major progress toward financial integration. EU now has a single supervisor and a single resolution authority, with banks being subject to the same European rulebook.

    The Banking Union also contributes to providing effective mechanisms for cross-border risk-sharing and broadening the sources of funding within a country, thereby promoting macroeconomic stability and growth. However, the following obstacles that hinder the fungibility of capital and liquidity of banking groups can still be observed:

    • Number of national options and discretions are hindering the practical application of cross-border liquidity waivers within the Union.
    • The proposal to have cross-border capital waivers within the EU was not taken forward in the ongoing review of the CRR, which is a missed opportunity. Some national authorities are concerned about the possible financial stability implications of the proposal. However, such concerns could be addressed by making the waivers subject to additional prudential safeguards and by putting in place appropriate transition arrangements that account for the planned further progress on the Banking Union.
    • The major progress made in Banking Union needs to be recognized in the international regulatory framework. The international regulatory framework should recognize the progress that has been made in the Banking Union and exclude intra Banking Union positions from the cross-jurisdictional indicators in the global systemically important bank (G-SIB) methodology.
    • The allocation of internal minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) has turned out to be an area of tension between national jurisdictions. Jurisdictions with a foreign bank subsidiary prefer to have a high pre-positioning of internal MREL to ensure an orderly resolution of its local subsidiary. However, this implies a certain degree of ring-fencing to the detriment of the foreign parent bank. The compromise reached by member states in the Council only allows that internal MREL is waived if the resolution entity and the subsidiary are located in the same member state. To account for the progress in terms of joint supervision and resolution among euro area countries, internal MREL waivers on a cross-border basis in the Banking Union should be allowed, as this would contribute to continuous cross-border banking. Therefore, it should also be possible to use guarantees to replace internal MREL and allow for more flexibility in the allocation of resources within the Banking Union.

     

    Related Link: Speech

    Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Banking Union, Pan-European Banking, Orderly Resolution, ECB

    Related Articles
    News

    RBNZ Publishes Financial Stability Report for May 2020

    RBNZ published the financial stability report for May 2020. This review of the financial system in the country highlights that the economic disruption associated with COVID-19 will present challenges to the financial system.

    May 27, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    Regulators and Private Sector Meet to Discuss COVID Policy Responses

    Financial policymakers and international standard-setters met virtually with private-sector executives to discuss international policy responses to COVID-19 pandemic.

    May 26, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Consults on Supervisory Policy for OTC Derivatives Transactions

    HKMA is consulting on revisions to the Supervisory Policy Manual module CR-G-14 on margin and other risk mitigation standards for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions.

    May 25, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Examines Impact of COVID Crisis on Banking Sector in EU

    EBA published thematic note presenting a preliminary assessment of the impact of COVID-19 outbreak on the banking sector in EU.

    May 25, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Clarifies Regulatory Treatment of Measures to Ease COVID Impact

    HKMA published a circular, addressed to authorized institutions, on the application of the Basel Committee guidance on certain COVID-related measures.

    May 25, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA on Regulatory Capital and IFRS 9 Requirements for Payment Holidays

    PRA provided further information on the application of regulatory capital and IFRS 9 requirements to payment holidays granted or extended to address the challenges arising from COVID-19 outbreak.

    May 22, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Finalizes Policy on Supervisory Approach for Insurance SPVs

    PRA published final policy (in PS13/20) setting out the approach and expectations for authorization and supervision of insurance special purpose vehicles (ISPVs or insurance SPVs).

    May 22, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Publishes Version 2.0.1 of Capital+ XBRL Utility

    BoE published version 2.0.1 of the Capital+ XBRL Utility, along with the related release notes.

    May 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA on Fintech Adoption and Innovation by Banks in Hong Kong

    HKMA announced the publication of a report on fintech adoption and innovation in the banking industry in Hong Kong.

    May 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS on Impact of Increasing Use of Cloud Technology on Cyber Risk

    BIS published a working paper that examines the drivers of cyber risk, especially in context of the cloud services.

    May 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 5214