General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
September 05, 2018

While speaking at the Eurofi Financial Forum 2018 in Vienna, Peter Praet of ECB talked about creating an enabling environment for pan-European banks in the Banking Union. He highlights that, in recent years, the European Union has achieved major progress toward financial integration. EU now has a single supervisor and a single resolution authority, with banks being subject to the same European rulebook.

The Banking Union also contributes to providing effective mechanisms for cross-border risk-sharing and broadening the sources of funding within a country, thereby promoting macroeconomic stability and growth. However, the following obstacles that hinder the fungibility of capital and liquidity of banking groups can still be observed:

  • Number of national options and discretions are hindering the practical application of cross-border liquidity waivers within the Union.
  • The proposal to have cross-border capital waivers within the EU was not taken forward in the ongoing review of the CRR, which is a missed opportunity. Some national authorities are concerned about the possible financial stability implications of the proposal. However, such concerns could be addressed by making the waivers subject to additional prudential safeguards and by putting in place appropriate transition arrangements that account for the planned further progress on the Banking Union.
  • The major progress made in Banking Union needs to be recognized in the international regulatory framework. The international regulatory framework should recognize the progress that has been made in the Banking Union and exclude intra Banking Union positions from the cross-jurisdictional indicators in the global systemically important bank (G-SIB) methodology.
  • The allocation of internal minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) has turned out to be an area of tension between national jurisdictions. Jurisdictions with a foreign bank subsidiary prefer to have a high pre-positioning of internal MREL to ensure an orderly resolution of its local subsidiary. However, this implies a certain degree of ring-fencing to the detriment of the foreign parent bank. The compromise reached by member states in the Council only allows that internal MREL is waived if the resolution entity and the subsidiary are located in the same member state. To account for the progress in terms of joint supervision and resolution among euro area countries, internal MREL waivers on a cross-border basis in the Banking Union should be allowed, as this would contribute to continuous cross-border banking. Therefore, it should also be possible to use guarantees to replace internal MREL and allow for more flexibility in the allocation of resources within the Banking Union.


Related Link: Speech

Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Banking Union, Pan-European Banking, Orderly Resolution, ECB

Related Articles

APRA Proposes Changes to Credit Risk Management Standard for Banks

APRA is proposing to update its prudential standard on credit risk management requirements for authorized deposit-taking institutions.

March 25, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

EIOPA Publishes Q&A on Regulations in March 2019

EIOPA updated questions and answers (Q&A) on the implementing and delegated regulations related to the Solvency II Directive.

March 25, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

BCBS Issues Follow-Up Reports on Basel III Implementation Assessments

BCBS published a report summarizing the follow-up actions taken or planned by member jurisdictions as of the end of 2018; these actions are intended to address deviations from the Basel standards identified as part of the Regulatory Consistency Assessment Program (RCAP).

March 25, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Fourth Update for March 2019

EBA published answers to five questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

March 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

ECB Updates Validation Checks and List of Identifiers Under AnaCredit

ECB updated the AnaCredit validation checks (Version 1.4) and the list of national identifiers (version 2.4) for AnaCredit reporting.

March 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

BCBS Publishes Results of the Basel III Monitoring Exercise

BCBS published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on data as of June 30, 2018.

March 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

EBA, FCA, and PRA Agree on MoU Template for Supervisory Cooperation

EBA, FCA, and PRA announced that they have agreed on a template for the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) that sets out the expectations for supervisory cooperation and information-sharing arrangements between UK and EU/European Economic Area national authorities.

March 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

HKMA Publishes CoP on Loss-Absorbing Capacity Requirements of Banks

HKMA issued, in relation to the Financial Institutions Resolution (Loss-Absorbing Capacity Requirements—Banking Sector) Rules (LAC Rules) a chapter of a code of practice (LAC CoP) under section 196 of the Financial Institutions Resolution Ordinance (FIRO).

March 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

EBA Publishes Reports Monitoring the Implementation of Basel III in EU

EBA published two reports measuring the impact of implementing the final Basel III reforms and monitoring the implementation of liquidity measures in EU.

March 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

BCBS Publishes Results of Survey on Proportionality in Bank Regulation

BCBS published a report presenting the results of a survey conducted on proportionality practices in bank regulation and supervision.

March 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2786