General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
September 05, 2018

Elke König of SRB published two articles that express her views on the need for an EU liquidation regime for banks and on ways to close the gaps in the Banking Union regarding funding in resolution. These articles were published in The Eurofi Magazine.

Why we need an EU liquidation regime for banks. The resolution of banks is a specific insolvency procedure, introduced as an alternative to liquidation under national laws. The lack of an EU liquidation regime is a major obstacle toward full-fledged Banking Union. With nineteen different insolvency frameworks in the Banking Union, the analysis of the insolvency counterfactual for a cross-border bank in resolution is a challenge and results in diverging outcomes depending on the home country of the institution. Bank insolvency procedures should be subject to common standards and practices at the EU level. The ideal solution would be EU-wide rules on insolvency proceedings for the banking sector. SRB is working within the Single Resolution Mechanism on National Handbooks to define how to implement resolution schemes in each country as well as national implementation steps for a decision not to adopt resolution. This is a step in the right direction, but is only a “second best” option and not comparable to a harmonization of bank insolvency procedures—something only legislators can deliver. Proposals for harmonization will inevitably be fraught with political perils and resistance. An incremental approach—such as the one exemplified by the recent harmonization of the ranking of unsecured debt instruments in insolvency—may be a more palatable solution. The ultimate goal, however, must be to have in place an EU liquidation regime alongside an EU resolution regime.

Gaps in the Banking Union regarding funding in resolution and how to close them. By definition a recapitalized bank that has absorbed losses will be solvent and have better access to funding. However, given that analysts and creditors will likely require time to re-assess the financial position, the return to market funding will be a process rather than a one-off fix. Addressing the risk of banks having insufficient liquidity following resolution action, therefore, presents a crucial task in resolution planning. FSB guidance recommends establishing temporary public backstop funding mechanisms. Such a tool does not exist in the Banking Union, which is a missing piece in the overall framework. A credible tool would address open issues in the current system and put the Banking Union framework at equal footing with other jurisdictions such as the US or UK. A credible temporary public solution will provide markets with the needed confidence and allow fast return to private funding. When designing a credible tool some fundamentals must be fulfilled:

  • First, all pre-conditions must be clear and resolution authorities should have certainty they can rely on the tool for finalizing all features of the resolution scheme, including funding, that is, liquidity on day one.
  • Second, the scale must be sizable and flexible enough to support the effective implementation of any resolution strategy. It goes without saying, that only viable and solvent institutions in resolution should be supported with funding.
  • Finally, the creation of a new sovereign-bank nexus should be avoided.

 

Related Links

Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Resolution Planning, Liquidation Regime, Banking Union, SRB

Related Articles
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Third Update for March 2019

EBA published answers to seven questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

March 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

OCC Updates Recovery Planning Booklet of the Comptroller's Handbook

OCC updated the Recovery Planning booklet of the Comptroller’s Handbook.

March 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Publishes Report on Convergence of Supervisory Practices Across EU

EBA published annual report on the convergence of supervisory practices in EU.

March 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

CPMI-IOSCO Publish Update to Level 1 Assessment of PFMI Implementation

CPMI and IOSCO jointly updated the Level 1 Assessment Online Tracker on monitoring of the implementation of the Principles for financial market infrastructures (PFMI).

March 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

Agustín Carstens of BIS Speaks About New Role of Central Banks

While speaking at the 20th anniversary conference of the Financial Stability Institute (FSI), Agustín Carstens, the General Manager of BIS, highlighted the need for regulatory actions in light of the continued evolution of financial technology.

March 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Publishes Policy Statement on Group Supervision Under Solvency II

PRA published a policy statement (PS9/19) that provides feedback on responses to the consultation paper CP15/18 and the final supervisory statement SS9/15 (Appendix) on group supervision under Solvency II.

March 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

ECB Announces Start Date for Euro Short-Term Rate

ECB announced that it will start publishing the euro short-term rate (€STR) as of October 02, 2019, reflecting the trading activity of October 01, 2019.

March 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Proposes to Update the Pillar 2 Capital Framework for Banks

PRA is proposing (CP5/19) to update the Pillar 2 capital framework to reflect continued refinements and developments in setting the PRA buffer (Pillar 2B).

March 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Publishes Policy Statement Related to Credit Risk Mitigation

PRA published a policy statement (PS8/19) that contains the final policy in the updated supervisory statement SS17/13 on credit risk mitigation (Appendix 1) as well as the statement SS31/15 on Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process or SREP (Appendix 2).

March 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FED Updates Supplemental Information and Q&A for Form FR Y-14

FED updated the supplemental instructions and the questions and answers (Q&A) document for the information collection on capital assessments and stress testing, which is covered by the reporting form FR Y-14A.

March 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2750