General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
September 03, 2018

During opening remarks of the Ninth Irving Fisher Committee Conference in Basel, the BIS General Manager Augustín Carstens examined the success of the post-crisis G20 Data Gaps Initiative and highlighted that "we have come a very long way toward completing the key statistical initiatives undertaken a decade ago." However, some significant efforts are still required and fulfilling the data gaps is likely to take many years. The work in this area consists of a continuous cycle of identifying data requirements, collecting new data, and applying a suitable lens.

Mr. Carstens summarized the progress made since the crisis, outlining the lessons learned so far, along with the current and upcoming challenges. BIS work suggests that aggregate data are most useful for identifying the build-up of emerging risk and that financial strains are best measured in consolidated statistics. In sharp contrast to 10 years ago, the interconnections between G-SIBs are now known to supervisors while a growing share of OTC derivatives and repo trades are centrally cleared and recorded. The availability of such data does not replace asking hard questions in daily supervisory practice, but it certainly facilitates decision-making in a crisis. Granular data must be collected, structured, and analyzed before they can be relied on for critical policy decisions. International sharing of data and analytical results has also improved with the establishment of supervisory colleges, the European Single Supervisory Mechanism, and the International Data Hub. Moreover, data coming out of the data gaps initiative are increasingly used to support financial stability analysis and macro-prudential policy at the national and international levels.

Next, he outlined the challenges that still remain for statisticians and policymakers, despite the considerable progress. He highlighted that identifying financial stability risks in this environment of next-generation fintech, cyber-security threats, and cryptoassets will require new efforts. Policymakers should seek to imagine the many ways in which technological change may disrupt core financial system functions and collect the corresponding data. One area is the potential erosion of credit standards as new underwriting procedures and mechanisms of certification take hold. Another is the uncertain liquidity implications of algorithmic trading and other technologies. Yet another area is the possible threat to the integrity of payment systems as the use of digital currencies expands. To stay abreast of new developments, it will be necessary to collect and share novel types of data, such as a register of cyber-attacks, or data on external cloud service providers. Expanded data collection needs to go hand in hand with scenario analysis. Integrated risk assessments should focus on multiple sources of threats. In the supervisory context, that would entail running a broad range of scenarios for stress tests, knowing that any single scenario represents but one small part of an infinite range of possible futures.

He emphasized that the combination of enhanced regulation, supervision, and information-sharing will help better prepare the financial system for the next financial crisis. Due to the international efforts in regulatory reform and the associated statistical initiatives, the core financial system is now more resilient than a decade ago. However, despite best efforts to have better data available, attempts to identify risks in real time will invariably fall short. Future booms and busts will come in new guises. Central banks should thus continue to remain alert and to probe areas that have the potential to undermine the stability of the financial system. With the aid of suptech, regtech, and datatech (refers to the range of innovations applying artificial intelligence, machine learning, and other automated processes to collect, process, analyze, and disseminate official statistics), "we should focus not only on closing known data gaps, but also on expanding information frontiersextending our knowledge base so as to better prepare ourselves for future developments." He concluded that it is necessary to cultivate the ability to better match data collection to the information needs and to make better sense of the collected data.


Related Link: Speech

Keywords: International, Banking, Data Gaps Initiative, Fintech, Regtech, Suptech, Datatech, Cyber Risk, Financial Stability, Statistics, BIS

Related Insights

BCBS Finds Liquidity Risk Management Principles Remain Fit for Purpose

BCBS completed a review of its 2008 Principles for sound liquidity risk management and supervision. The review confirmed that the principles remain fit for purpose.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

HKMA Urges Local Banks to Start Working on FRTB Implementation

HKMA announced that it plans to issue a consultation paper on the new market risk standard in the second quarter of 2019.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

EBA Finalizes Guidelines for High-Risk Exposures Under CRR

EBA published the final guidelines on the specification of types of exposures to be associated with high risk under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). The guidelines are intended to facilitate a higher degree of comparability in terms of the current practices in identifying high-risk exposures.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

MAS Guidelines on Risk Mitigation Requirements for OTC Derivatives

MAS published guidelines on risk mitigation requirements for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives contracts.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

BoE Publishes the Schedule for Statistical Reporting for 2019

BoE published the updated schedule for statistical reporting for 2019. The reporting institutions use the online statistical data application (OSCA) to submit statistical data to BoE.

January 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

PRA Delays Final Direction on Reporting of Private Securitizations

PRA and FCA have delayed the issuance of final direction, including the final template, on reporting of private securitizations, from January 15, 2019 to the end of January 2019.

January 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

SNB Updates Forms on Supervisory Reporting for Banks

SNB published Version 1.7 of reporting forms (AUR_U, AUR_UEA, AUR_UES, AURH_U, AUR_K, AUR_KEA, and AURH_K) and the related documentation for supervisory reporting on an individual and consolidated basis.

January 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

BCBS Finalizes Market Risk Capital Framework and Work Program for 2019

BCBS published the final framework for market risk capital requirements and its work program for 2019. Also published was an explanatory note to provide a non-technical description of the overall market risk framework, the changes that have been incorporated into in this version of the framework and impact of the framework.

January 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: First Update for January 2019

EBA published answers to 13 questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

January 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

PRA Proposes to Amend Supervisory Statement on Credit Risk Mitigation

PRA published the consultation paper CP1/19 that is proposing changes to the supervisory statement (SS17/13) on credit risk mitigation.

January 10, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2473