The European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) published two occasional papers: one paper explores a potential application of the empirical growth-at-risk approach for design of macro-prudential policies while the other discusses the importance of the Legal Entity Identifier (LEI), particularly its role in monitoring systemic risk. The paper on LEI provides background material for Recommendation ESRB/2020/12, which intends to facilitate the implementation of the EU legal framework to uniquely identify legal entities engaged in financial transactions via an LEI and to make its use in supervisory reporting and public disclosures systematic.
Paper on LEI. The paper describes the importance of a unique identifier of legal entities to financial stability and explains why the LEI is the identifier of choice and presents the state of play of its implementation. Next, the paper sets out the advantages of a globally defined LEI for the two different types of user, namely public authorities and the wider financial and non-financial industry. It also discusses the limitations on expanding the use of the LEI, which include costs involved with LEI uptake, the existence of similar identifiers used by local, national or regional authorities rather than globally, the use of LEI outside the financial sector, and the lack of legal requirements for the use of LEI. The paper then outlines and discusses two possibilities to address these shortcomings: having the LEI issued by national business registers at the time of business entity registration and having the LEI issuance facilitated by banks. Finally, the paper provides empirical evidence of the advantages of using the LEI in two member states, namely Germany and France. The experience gained in member states in using the LEI is expected to be crucial for implementing the recommendation.
Paper on macro-prudential policy design. The paper explores a potential application of the empirical growth-at-risk approach to the assessment and design of macroprudential policies. It studies how macro-prudential policy could be designed and evaluated using a linear-quadratic social welfare criterion that rewards expected GDP growth and penalizes the gap between expected GDP growth and growth-at-risk. It shows that, in specific environments, this welfare criterion can be micro-founded as consistent with expected-utility maximization under risk-averse preferences for GDP levels. The main challenges for the applicability of this framework are more empirical and political than conceptual. On the political side, once data and estimation provide a reliable description of the policy trade-offs, the main challenge will be to define society’s aversion for financial instability on which optimal policies should be based. Additionally, given the uncertainty surrounding the relevant parameters implied by the empirical challenges, policymakers may need to be guided on how to expand the type of framework sketched in this paper to account for model uncertainty (that is, for the imperfect knowledge of the specification and parameters of the relevant quantile regressions) and the potential policy mistakes that could stem from this uncertainty.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, LEI, Systemic Risk, Macro-Prudential Policy, Growth-at-Risk, ESRB
Across 35 years in banking, Blake has gained deep insights into the inner working of this sector. Over the last two decades, Blake has been an Operating Committee member, leading teams and executing strategies in Credit and Enterprise Risk as well as Line of Business. His focus over this time has been primarily Commercial/Corporate with particular emphasis on CRE. Blake has spent most of his career with large and mid-size banks. Blake joined Moody’s Analytics in 2021 after leading the transformation of the credit approval and reporting process at a $25 billion bank.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) announced that the Green and Sustainable Finance (GSF) Cross-Agency Steering Group has launched the information and data repositories and outlined the progress made in advancing the development of green and sustainable finance in Hong Kong.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published a report that explores the feasibility of integrating the G-Cubed general equilibrium model into the NGFS suite of models.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.