The European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) published two occasional papers: one paper explores a potential application of the empirical growth-at-risk approach for design of macro-prudential policies while the other discusses the importance of the Legal Entity Identifier (LEI), particularly its role in monitoring systemic risk. The paper on LEI provides background material for Recommendation ESRB/2020/12, which intends to facilitate the implementation of the EU legal framework to uniquely identify legal entities engaged in financial transactions via an LEI and to make its use in supervisory reporting and public disclosures systematic.
Paper on LEI. The paper describes the importance of a unique identifier of legal entities to financial stability and explains why the LEI is the identifier of choice and presents the state of play of its implementation. Next, the paper sets out the advantages of a globally defined LEI for the two different types of user, namely public authorities and the wider financial and non-financial industry. It also discusses the limitations on expanding the use of the LEI, which include costs involved with LEI uptake, the existence of similar identifiers used by local, national or regional authorities rather than globally, the use of LEI outside the financial sector, and the lack of legal requirements for the use of LEI. The paper then outlines and discusses two possibilities to address these shortcomings: having the LEI issued by national business registers at the time of business entity registration and having the LEI issuance facilitated by banks. Finally, the paper provides empirical evidence of the advantages of using the LEI in two member states, namely Germany and France. The experience gained in member states in using the LEI is expected to be crucial for implementing the recommendation.
Paper on macro-prudential policy design. The paper explores a potential application of the empirical growth-at-risk approach to the assessment and design of macroprudential policies. It studies how macro-prudential policy could be designed and evaluated using a linear-quadratic social welfare criterion that rewards expected GDP growth and penalizes the gap between expected GDP growth and growth-at-risk. It shows that, in specific environments, this welfare criterion can be micro-founded as consistent with expected-utility maximization under risk-averse preferences for GDP levels. The main challenges for the applicability of this framework are more empirical and political than conceptual. On the political side, once data and estimation provide a reliable description of the policy trade-offs, the main challenge will be to define society’s aversion for financial instability on which optimal policies should be based. Additionally, given the uncertainty surrounding the relevant parameters implied by the empirical challenges, policymakers may need to be guided on how to expand the type of framework sketched in this paper to account for model uncertainty (that is, for the imperfect knowledge of the specification and parameters of the relevant quantile regressions) and the potential policy mistakes that could stem from this uncertainty.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, LEI, Systemic Risk, Macro-Prudential Policy, Growth-at-Risk, ESRB
Across 35 years in banking, Blake has gained deep insights into the inner working of this sector. Over the last two decades, Blake has been an Operating Committee member, leading teams and executing strategies in Credit and Enterprise Risk as well as Line of Business. His focus over this time has been primarily Commercial/Corporate with particular emphasis on CRE. Blake has spent most of his career with large and mid-size banks. Blake joined Moody’s Analytics in 2021 after leading the transformation of the credit approval and reporting process at a $25 billion bank.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an update on the discussion paper that intended to engage federally regulated financial institutions and other interested stakeholders in a dialog with OSFI, to proactively enhance and align assurance expectations over key regulatory returns.
The European Commission (EC) published a report summarizing responses to the targeted consultation on the supervisory convergence and the single rulebook in the European Union (EU).
The European Central Bank (ECB) published its opinion on a proposal for a regulation on European green bonds, following a request from the European Parliament.
The Advisory Scientific Committee (ASC) of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) published a report that explores the expected impact of digitalization on provision of financial and banking services, and proposes policy measures to address the risks stemming from digitalization.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) is consulting on the draft Financial Institutions (Resolution) Ordinance (Cap. 628), or FIRO, Code of Practice chapter on liquidity and funding in resolution, until March 14, 2022.
The Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FI) announced that the capital adequacy reporting as at December 31, 2021 must be done by February 11, 2022.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) announced that the guidelines on the reporting and disclosure of exposures subject to measures COVID-relief measures shall continue to apply until further notice.
The Central Bank of the Philippines (BSP) issued communications covering developments related to online lending platforms, open finance framework and roadmap, and on the expected regulations in the area sustainable finance.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published the final rule that amends Regulation I to reduce the quarterly reporting burden for member banks by automating the application process for adjusting their subscriptions to the Federal Reserve Bank capital stock, except in the context of mergers.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its assessment of risks through the quarterly Risk Dashboard and the results of the Autumn edition of the Risk Assessment Questionnaire (RAQ).