General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
October 31, 2017

IMF published a working paper that outlines a framework to perform liquidity stress tests for investment funds. The paper discusses practical aspects related to the calibration of the redemption shock, the measurement of liquidity buffers, and the assessment of resilience of investment funds. The integration of liquidity stress tests with banking sector stress tests and possible bank-fund inter-linkages are also covered.

In the banking sector, solvency and liquidity stress tests have been performed for a long time and regulators have provided the industry with guidance. However, in the fund industry, there has been little guidance on how to perform liquidity stress tests. The paper aims to fill this gap by providing a framework for liquidity stress testing for funds that could be used by regulators or market participants. The working paper presents the method used to perform liquidity stress tests; provides some outcome of the liquidity stress tests for a sample of bond funds; and discusses the related policy implications.

The paper notes that the objective of the liquidity stress test is to assess the resilience of investment funds—at the individual level or at the industry level—to severe, but plausible, redemption shocks. The approach is flexible enough to cope with different methodological assumptions and different degrees of data availability. The framework focuses on the resilience of individual funds or group of funds. Further efforts are needed to integrate the current framework in financial stability analyses. The future work could focus on the design of stress tests for funds, along the lines of modeling joint liquidity and market shocks; on considering the absorbing capacity of markets; and including fire sales. Additional work on data gaps is also warranted, in particular regarding bank-fund inter-linkages. Finally, more exploratory work on integrating further bank-fund inter-linkages would be required to perform system-wide stress tests, as recently recommended by FSB.

 

Related Link: Working Paper (PDF)

Keywords: International, Banking, Liquidity Stress Testing, Investment Funds, Working Paper, IMF

Related Articles
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Third Update for March 2019

EBA published answers to seven questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

March 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

OCC Updates Recovery Planning Booklet of the Comptroller's Handbook

OCC updated the Recovery Planning booklet of the Comptroller’s Handbook.

March 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Publishes Report on Convergence of Supervisory Practices Across EU

EBA published annual report on the convergence of supervisory practices in EU.

March 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

CPMI-IOSCO Publish Update to Level 1 Assessment of PFMI Implementation

CPMI and IOSCO jointly updated the Level 1 Assessment Online Tracker on monitoring of the implementation of the Principles for financial market infrastructures (PFMI).

March 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

Agustín Carstens of BIS Speaks About New Role of Central Banks

While speaking at the 20th anniversary conference of the Financial Stability Institute (FSI), Agustín Carstens, the General Manager of BIS, highlighted the need for regulatory actions in light of the continued evolution of financial technology.

March 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Publishes Policy Statement on Group Supervision Under Solvency II

PRA published a policy statement (PS9/19) that provides feedback on responses to the consultation paper CP15/18 and the final supervisory statement SS9/15 (Appendix) on group supervision under Solvency II.

March 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

ECB Announces Start Date for Euro Short-Term Rate

ECB announced that it will start publishing the euro short-term rate (€STR) as of October 02, 2019, reflecting the trading activity of October 01, 2019.

March 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Proposes to Update the Pillar 2 Capital Framework for Banks

PRA is proposing (CP5/19) to update the Pillar 2 capital framework to reflect continued refinements and developments in setting the PRA buffer (Pillar 2B).

March 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Publishes Policy Statement Related to Credit Risk Mitigation

PRA published a policy statement (PS8/19) that contains the final policy in the updated supervisory statement SS17/13 on credit risk mitigation (Appendix 1) as well as the statement SS31/15 on Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process or SREP (Appendix 2).

March 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FED Updates Supplemental Information and Q&A for Form FR Y-14

FED updated the supplemental instructions and the questions and answers (Q&A) document for the information collection on capital assessments and stress testing, which is covered by the reporting form FR Y-14A.

March 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2750