PRA published its approach to banking and insurance supervision. The approach sets out the way PRA performs its role in respect of deposit-takers, designated investment firms, and insurers. The approach documents are intended to aid accountability by describing what and how PRA seeks to achieve its objectives. These documents communicate to regulated firms and insurers what is expected of them and what they can expect in the course of supervision. The approach documents are also intended to meet the statutory requirement for PRA to issue guidance on how PRA intends to advance its objectives. The approach documents sit alongside the requirements and expectations published in the PRA Rulebook and policy publications.
The PRA approach to banking and insurance supervision highlights the following:
- Having successfully implemented a ring-fence to separate retail banking from global trading, PRA will now police the fence as an integral part of the supervisory approach. PRA will ensure continued compliance with restrictions on activities performed by the ring-fenced banks and their independence from the rest of the group.
- In the context of firms’ increasing reliance on digital systems and platforms and the risk of cyber-attacks, operational resilience is on track to become as embedded in the supervisory approach as financial resilience. PRA will prioritize the interventions proportionally based on safety and soundness and any potential financial stability implications of potential operational disruptions.
- Having fully embedded the Senior Managers Regime for banks (and soon also for insurers), individual accountability has become a key tool through which PRA delivers its supervisory approach.
- PRA is working to ensure that transition to the UK’s new relationship with EU is as smooth as possible in financial services, to minimize risks to its objectives, through mechanisms such as the Temporary Permissions Regime, which will allow to bridge the incoming EU-27 firms for three years while they seek an authorization to continue business in the UK.
Keywords: Europe, EU, UK, Banking, Insurance, Ring-Fencing, SM&CR, Brexit, Temporary Permissions Regime, PRA
PRA, via the consultation paper CP12/20, proposed changes to its rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement certain elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
EIOPA published the financial stability report that provides detailed quantitative and qualitative assessment of the key risks identified for the insurance and occupational pensions sectors in the European Economic Area.
EBA published its risk dashboard for the first quarter of 2020 together with the results of the risk assessment questionnaire.
EBA announced that the next stress testing exercise is expected to be launched at the end of January 2021 and its results are to be published at the end of July 2021.
PRA published the consultation paper CP11/20 that sets out its expectations and guidance related to auditors’ work on the matching adjustment under Solvency II.
MAS published a statement guidance on dividend distribution by banks.
APRA updated its capital management guidance for banks, particularly easing restrictions around paying dividends as institutions continue to manage the disruption caused by COVID-19 pandemic.
FSB published a report that reviews the progress on data collection for macro-prudential analysis and the availability and use of macro-prudential tools in Germany.
EBA issued a statement reminding financial institutions that the transition period between EU and UK will expire on December 31, 2020; this will end the possibility for the UK-based financial institutions to offer financial services to EU customers on a cross-border basis via passporting.
SRB published guidance on operational continuity in resolution and financial market infrastructure (FMI) contingency plans.