PRA published the consultation paper CP27/18, which sets out proposals to amend the supervisory statement (SS3/15) on the quality of capital instruments under Solvency II. The consultation closes on January 02, 2019. The intended implementation date for the final policy, which has been proposed in CP27/18, is February 01, 2019. The purpose of the proposal is to prevent the amount of loss-absorbency provided by restricted Tier 1 own funds (rT1) from being overstated.
SS3/15 covers the prohibition on redemption of instruments within five years of the date of issue, liability management and capital reduction, principal loss-absorbency mechanism for the restricted Tier 1 instruments, and additional considerations for instruments intended to contribute to group own funds. PRA proposed to update SS3/15 to add an expectation that insurers would deduct the maximum tax charge generated on write-down, when including external rT1 capital instruments that write down on trigger in their own funds. PRA plans to introduce this expectation for the new issuance of rT1 instruments after January 31, 2019. For firms that have already issued external rT1 instruments that write down on trigger, the supervisory team would discuss appropriate arrangements with each firm on a case-by-case basis.
This is in the light of the proposed tax changes introduced by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) in the Budget on October 29, 2018 pertaining to hybrid instruments. CP27/18 specifically addresses the implications of those proposed tax changes on rT1. CP27/18 is relevant to UK insurance firms within the scope of Solvency II, the Society of Lloyd’s, and firms that are part of a Solvency II group that will determine and classify capital instruments under the Solvency II own funds regime, along with their advisers.
Comment Due Date: January 02, 2019
Effective Date: February 01, 2019
Keywords: Europe, UK, Solvency II, Loss Absorbency, rT1, CP27/18, SS3/15, PRA
Previous ArticleMAS Finalizes Regulations to Enhance Resolution Regime in Singapore
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).