Featured Product

    ESMA Issues Clarifications on Clearing and Trading Obligations

    October 31, 2018

    ESMA issued clarifications for clearing and trading obligations under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR or Regulation No 648/2012), ahead of the December 21, 2018 deadline. The statement addresses the challenges that certain groups and non-financial counterparties above the clearing threshold (NFCs+) would face on December 21, 2018, when they start central clearing of some of the over-the-counter (OTC) derivative contracts and trading them on trading venues.

    Under the EMIR, both the following expire on December 21, 2018, for the interest rate derivative classes denominated in the G4 currencies subject to the clearing obligation:

    • The current derogation from the clearing obligation for certain intragroup transactions concluded with a third country group entity
    • The phase-in for counterparties in Category 4, broadly speaking NFCs+

    With respect to the current derogation from the clearing obligation for certain intragroup transactions concluded with a third country group entity, given the absence of equivalence decisions, ESMA undertook a review of the Commission Delegated Regulations on the clearing obligation and developed draft amendments to extend the derogation expiration to December 21, 2020. Whereas, with respect to the phase-in for counterparties in Category 4, the proposal of EC to amend EMIR, which was published in May 2017 (REFIT) and is being negotiated by the EU institutions, envisages that NFCs+ would only be subject to the clearing obligation in the asset class(es) where their level of activity is above the clearing threshold.

    In case the amendments mentioned above have not entered into force by the current expiration date, these counterparties would need to have clearing arrangements in place and start clearing these transactions, before they are once again no longer required to do so after the amendments enter into force. Furthermore, given the link between the MiFIR trading obligation and the EMIR clearing obligation, this potential timing gap would also have implications regarding the trading obligation. ESMA expects competent authorities to:

    • Not prioritize their supervisory actions toward group entities that benefit from the derogation for intragroup transactions meeting certain conditions on and after December 21, 2018
    • Not prioritize their supervisory actions toward NFCs+ that are not above the clearing threshold (as prescribed under the EMIR legislation) in the interest rate derivative asset class on or after December 21, 2018
    • Generally apply their risk-based supervisory powers in their day-to-day enforcement of applicable legislation in this area in a proportionate manner


    Related Links

    Keywords: Europe, EU, Securities, Clearing Obligation, Trading Obligation, CCPs, NFC+, Intragroup Transactions, EMIR, ESMA

    Related Articles
    News

    APRA Publishes Approach to Regulating and Supervising GCRA Risks

    APRA published an information paper that sets out a more intensive regulatory approach to transform governance, culture, remuneration, and accountability (GCRA) practices across the prudentially regulated financial sector.

    November 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    IAIS Publishes Application Paper on Recovery Planning

    IAIS published the final application paper on recovery planning, along with the resolution of comments on the draft application paper.

    November 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Publishes Summary of November Meeting of RCG for MENA Region

    FSB published a summary of the November meeting of the Regional Consultative Group (RCG) for Middle East and North Africa (MENA).

    November 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Second Update for November 2019

    EBA updated the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) tool with answers to eight questions that relate to the Bank Resolution and Recovery Directive (BRRD) and the Capital Requirements Regulation and Directive (CRR and CRD).

    November 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSI Examines Use of Red Team Testing to Enhance Cyber Resilience

    The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of BIS published a paper that examines the contribution of red team testing frameworks toward enhancing cyber resilience.

    November 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FASB Delays Effective Dates for CECL, Leases, and Hedging Standards

    FASB issued two Accounting Standards Updates finalizing the delays in effective dates for standards on current expected credit losses (CECL), leases, hedging, and long-duration insurance contracts.

    November 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESMA Updates Q&A on Securitization Regulation in November 2019

    ESMA updated questions and answers (Q&A) on the Securitization Regulation (Regulation 2017/2402).

    November 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Announces Finalization of Banking Liquidity Amendment Rules 2019

    HKMA issued a letter informing all authorized institutions that negative vetting of the Banking (Liquidity) (Amendment) Rules 2019 (BLAR) has now expired. Thus, the BLAR will now come into operation from January 01, 2020.

    November 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS Consults on Revised Disclosures for Market Risk Framework

    BCBS launched a consultation on the revised disclosure requirements for the market risk framework for banks.

    November 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS Consults on Disclosure Templates of Sovereign Exposures of Banks

    BCBS published a consultation on the voluntary disclosure templates related to sovereign exposures of banks.

    November 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 4167