Featured Product

    ESMA Issues Clarifications on Clearing and Trading Obligations

    October 31, 2018

    ESMA issued clarifications for clearing and trading obligations under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR or Regulation No 648/2012), ahead of the December 21, 2018 deadline. The statement addresses the challenges that certain groups and non-financial counterparties above the clearing threshold (NFCs+) would face on December 21, 2018, when they start central clearing of some of the over-the-counter (OTC) derivative contracts and trading them on trading venues.

    Under the EMIR, both the following expire on December 21, 2018, for the interest rate derivative classes denominated in the G4 currencies subject to the clearing obligation:

    • The current derogation from the clearing obligation for certain intragroup transactions concluded with a third country group entity
    • The phase-in for counterparties in Category 4, broadly speaking NFCs+

    With respect to the current derogation from the clearing obligation for certain intragroup transactions concluded with a third country group entity, given the absence of equivalence decisions, ESMA undertook a review of the Commission Delegated Regulations on the clearing obligation and developed draft amendments to extend the derogation expiration to December 21, 2020. Whereas, with respect to the phase-in for counterparties in Category 4, the proposal of EC to amend EMIR, which was published in May 2017 (REFIT) and is being negotiated by the EU institutions, envisages that NFCs+ would only be subject to the clearing obligation in the asset class(es) where their level of activity is above the clearing threshold.

    In case the amendments mentioned above have not entered into force by the current expiration date, these counterparties would need to have clearing arrangements in place and start clearing these transactions, before they are once again no longer required to do so after the amendments enter into force. Furthermore, given the link between the MiFIR trading obligation and the EMIR clearing obligation, this potential timing gap would also have implications regarding the trading obligation. ESMA expects competent authorities to:

    • Not prioritize their supervisory actions toward group entities that benefit from the derogation for intragroup transactions meeting certain conditions on and after December 21, 2018
    • Not prioritize their supervisory actions toward NFCs+ that are not above the clearing threshold (as prescribed under the EMIR legislation) in the interest rate derivative asset class on or after December 21, 2018
    • Generally apply their risk-based supervisory powers in their day-to-day enforcement of applicable legislation in this area in a proportionate manner


    Related Links

    Keywords: Europe, EU, Securities, Clearing Obligation, Trading Obligation, CCPs, NFC+, Intragroup Transactions, EMIR, ESMA

    Related Articles
    News

    SEC Adopts Rules and Amendments Under Regulatory Regime for Swaps

    SEC announced that it took a significant step toward establishing the regulatory regime for security-based swap dealers (SBSDs) by adopting a package of rules and rule amendments under Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act.

    September 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Revises Standard on Margin Rules for Uncleared Derivatives

    APRA revised CPS 226, which is the prudential standard on margin and risk mitigation requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives.

    September 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Formalizes Agreement to Set Up Innovation Hub in Hong Kong SAR

    BIS and HKMA signed the Operational Agreement on the BIS Innovation Hub Center in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR).

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Proposal on Probability of Default and LGD Estimation

    PRA proposed, via the consultation paper CP21/19, an approach to implementing EBA’s recent regulatory products relating to Probability of Default (PD) estimation, Loss Given Default (LGD) estimation, and the treatment of defaulted exposures in the internal ratings-based (IRB) approach to credit risk.

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Issues Consultation on Prudent Person Principle Under Solvency II

    PRA, via the consultation paper CP22/19, has set out its proposed expectations for investment by firms, in accordance with the Prudent Person Principle (PPP).

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    CFTC Extends Comment Period for Proposals on Cross-Border Clearing

    CFTC announced that it is extending, until November 18, 2019, the comment period for the proposal for an alternative compliance framework for derivatives clearing organizations (DCOs) that are organized outside of U.S. and that do not pose substantial risk to the U.S. financial system.

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BNM Publishes Financial Stability Review for the First Half of 2019

    BNM published Financial Stability Review for the first half of 2019.

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Observations from Thematic Review on Recovery Plans of Insurers

    APRA issued a letter to general insurers and life insurers, outlining observations from a recent thematic review on recovery planning by insurers.

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FASB Issues Summary of Tentative Board Decisions at September Meeting

    FASB published a summary of the tentative decisions taken at its Board meeting in September 2019.

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Forms Consultative Expert Group on Digital Ethics in Insurance

    EIOPA established the Consultative Expert Group on Digital Ethics in Insurance to assist EIOPA in the development of digital responsibility principles in insurance.

    September 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3848