Featured Product

    Agustín Carstens of BIS on Role of Proportionality in Tackling Risks

    October 30, 2018

    In a keynote address at the 13th ASBA-BCBS-FSI High-level Meeting on "Global and Regional Supervisory Priorities," Agustín Carstens, the General Manager of BIS, focused on possible ways to mitigate the previously identified risks that led to the global financial crisis and the emerging risks arising as a result of innovative technologies. He discussed the relevance of achieving a timely and adequate implementation of the post-crisis reforms, with an emphasis on the role that proportionality could play in dealing with some of the challenges that may arise in this implementation process. With respect to the emerging risks, he elaborated on the potential disruption that innovative technologies may cause in the financial system landscape and how to go about regulating them to maximize their benefits and to minimize their risks.

    With the bulk of regulatory changes broadly complete, the focus shifts to implementation into national law, which must be consistent and timely. A forthcoming Financial Stability Institute (FSI) survey on the implementation of the Basel framework shows that many non-Basel Committee members in Latin America have implemented, or are in the process of implementing, relevant pieces of the Basel III framework. The most common elements implemented, or in the pipeline, are the definition of capital and the revised operational risk framework. Additionally, most of the surveyed jurisdictions in the region do not seem to be prioritizing the implementation of the liquidity standards, possibly owing to the complexity of the new standards and the consequent regulatory burden. Consequently, many jurisdictions have started implementing simplified prudential approaches for small and less complex financial institutions. However, in several jurisdictions that have implemented proportionality in prudential regulation, simplified approaches are typically more stringent than international standards. The adoption of a proportionate regulatory approach should avoid over-protecting inefficient institutions from competitive forces. These forces are likely to be relevant in a context in which technological innovations are likely to alter in a significant way the competitive position of different types of financial institutions, thus leading to a substantial modification of the structure of the banking industry.

    Next, he discussed the challenges posed by technological developments. For example, while the new entrants will bring competition in the market for some non-core financial services, this may also trigger more concentration on traditional intermediation activities, as technology will normally increase economies of scale in the provision of those services. In addition, the increased participation of non-regulated (or lightly regulated) institutions in activities such as the provision of payment services, or the creation of opaque means of payment through distributed ledger technologies, may support some illegal activities. Also, a rapid and disorderly development of new investment products could weaken consumer protection. Furthermore, a generalized reliance of financial institutions on a small group of third-party providers of technological services generates business continuity risks that could become systemic. The intensive use of automated systems by financial institutions and other providers of financial services does exacerbate cyber-security risks and challenges the protection of customer data. Given these risks, effective regulatory action seems indispensable to promote the orderly assimilation of innovations.

    Mr. Carstens added that effective regulation should be proportionate, holistic, and coordinated at the global level. He added that close cooperation between regulators and firms developing innovations may steepen the learning curve for public authorities and, thus, facilitate the required proportionality of the regulatory action. This is why the creation of regulatory sandboxes, sponsored in many cases by the regulators themselves, is a valid initiative. Technological development is a global phenomenon, as innovations are rapidly spread out internationally and providers of new services and products often act on a cross-border basis, taking advantage of the new virtual distribution channels. It is, therefore, essential to guarantee appropriate cooperation among relevant authorities worldwide and, once sufficient experience is accumulated, to start developing new global regulatory standards to address the relevant policy issues. The international cooperation arrangements already in place, that we call the Basel Process, are well-suited to facilitate the required interaction among regulators. Yet, given the multidisciplinary nature of the policy challenges, the existing structures may have to be adjusted to ensure sufficient involvement of all relevant players beyond financial regulators. 

     

    Related Link: Speech

    Keywords: International, Banking, Fintech, Regtech, Cyber Risk, Proportionality, BIS

    Related Articles
    News

    PRA Consults on Implementation of Certain Provisions of CRD5

    PRA, via the consultation paper CP12/20, proposed changes to its rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement certain elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).

    July 31, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Report Identifies Key Financial Stability Risks for Insurers

    EIOPA published the financial stability report that provides detailed quantitative and qualitative assessment of the key risks identified for the insurance and occupational pensions sectors in the European Economic Area.

    July 30, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Publishes Risk Dashboard for First Quarter of 2020

    EBA published its risk dashboard for the first quarter of 2020 together with the results of the risk assessment questionnaire.

    July 30, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Issues Updates on Stress Test Exercise for Banks in EU

    EBA announced that the next stress testing exercise is expected to be launched at the end of January 2021 and its results are to be published at the end of July 2021.

    July 30, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Proposes Guidance Related to Matching Adjustment under Solvency II

    PRA published the consultation paper CP11/20 that sets out its expectations and guidance related to auditors’ work on the matching adjustment under Solvency II.

    July 30, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    MAS Issues Guidance on Dividend Distributions by Banks

    MAS published a statement guidance on dividend distribution by banks.

    July 30, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Updates Guidance on Capital Management for Banks

    APRA updated its capital management guidance for banks, particularly easing restrictions around paying dividends as institutions continue to manage the disruption caused by COVID-19 pandemic.

    July 29, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Report Reviews Macro-Prudential Framework and Tools in Germany

    FSB published a report that reviews the progress on data collection for macro-prudential analysis and the availability and use of macro-prudential tools in Germany.

    July 29, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Urges Firms to Finalize Preparations for End of Brexit Transition

    EBA issued a statement reminding financial institutions that the transition period between EU and UK will expire on December 31, 2020; this will end the possibility for the UK-based financial institutions to offer financial services to EU customers on a cross-border basis via passporting.

    July 29, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    SRB on Operational Continuity in Resolution and FMI Contingency Plans

    SRB published guidance on operational continuity in resolution and financial market infrastructure (FMI) contingency plans.

    July 29, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 5604