General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
October 30, 2018

In a keynote address at the 13th ASBA-BCBS-FSI High-level Meeting on "Global and Regional Supervisory Priorities," Agustín Carstens, the General Manager of BIS, focused on possible ways to mitigate the previously identified risks that led to the global financial crisis and the emerging risks arising as a result of innovative technologies. He discussed the relevance of achieving a timely and adequate implementation of the post-crisis reforms, with an emphasis on the role that proportionality could play in dealing with some of the challenges that may arise in this implementation process. With respect to the emerging risks, he elaborated on the potential disruption that innovative technologies may cause in the financial system landscape and how to go about regulating them to maximize their benefits and to minimize their risks.

With the bulk of regulatory changes broadly complete, the focus shifts to implementation into national law, which must be consistent and timely. A forthcoming Financial Stability Institute (FSI) survey on the implementation of the Basel framework shows that many non-Basel Committee members in Latin America have implemented, or are in the process of implementing, relevant pieces of the Basel III framework. The most common elements implemented, or in the pipeline, are the definition of capital and the revised operational risk framework. Additionally, most of the surveyed jurisdictions in the region do not seem to be prioritizing the implementation of the liquidity standards, possibly owing to the complexity of the new standards and the consequent regulatory burden. Consequently, many jurisdictions have started implementing simplified prudential approaches for small and less complex financial institutions. However, in several jurisdictions that have implemented proportionality in prudential regulation, simplified approaches are typically more stringent than international standards. The adoption of a proportionate regulatory approach should avoid over-protecting inefficient institutions from competitive forces. These forces are likely to be relevant in a context in which technological innovations are likely to alter in a significant way the competitive position of different types of financial institutions, thus leading to a substantial modification of the structure of the banking industry.

Next, he discussed the challenges posed by technological developments. For example, while the new entrants will bring competition in the market for some non-core financial services, this may also trigger more concentration on traditional intermediation activities, as technology will normally increase economies of scale in the provision of those services. In addition, the increased participation of non-regulated (or lightly regulated) institutions in activities such as the provision of payment services, or the creation of opaque means of payment through distributed ledger technologies, may support some illegal activities. Also, a rapid and disorderly development of new investment products could weaken consumer protection. Furthermore, a generalized reliance of financial institutions on a small group of third-party providers of technological services generates business continuity risks that could become systemic. The intensive use of automated systems by financial institutions and other providers of financial services does exacerbate cyber-security risks and challenges the protection of customer data. Given these risks, effective regulatory action seems indispensable to promote the orderly assimilation of innovations.

Mr. Carstens added that effective regulation should be proportionate, holistic, and coordinated at the global level. He added that close cooperation between regulators and firms developing innovations may steepen the learning curve for public authorities and, thus, facilitate the required proportionality of the regulatory action. This is why the creation of regulatory sandboxes, sponsored in many cases by the regulators themselves, is a valid initiative. Technological development is a global phenomenon, as innovations are rapidly spread out internationally and providers of new services and products often act on a cross-border basis, taking advantage of the new virtual distribution channels. It is, therefore, essential to guarantee appropriate cooperation among relevant authorities worldwide and, once sufficient experience is accumulated, to start developing new global regulatory standards to address the relevant policy issues. The international cooperation arrangements already in place, that we call the Basel Process, are well-suited to facilitate the required interaction among regulators. Yet, given the multidisciplinary nature of the policy challenges, the existing structures may have to be adjusted to ensure sufficient involvement of all relevant players beyond financial regulators. 


Related Link: Speech

Keywords: International, Banking, Fintech, Regtech, Cyber Risk, Proportionality, BIS

Related Insights

BCBS Finds Liquidity Risk Management Principles Remain Fit for Purpose

BCBS completed a review of its 2008 Principles for sound liquidity risk management and supervision. The review confirmed that the principles remain fit for purpose.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

HKMA Urges Local Banks to Start Working on FRTB Implementation

HKMA announced that it plans to issue a consultation paper on the new market risk standard in the second quarter of 2019.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

EBA Finalizes Guidelines for High-Risk Exposures Under CRR

EBA published the final guidelines on the specification of types of exposures to be associated with high risk under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). The guidelines are intended to facilitate a higher degree of comparability in terms of the current practices in identifying high-risk exposures.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

MAS Guidelines on Risk Mitigation Requirements for OTC Derivatives

MAS published guidelines on risk mitigation requirements for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives contracts.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

BoE Publishes the Schedule for Statistical Reporting for 2019

BoE published the updated schedule for statistical reporting for 2019. The reporting institutions use the online statistical data application (OSCA) to submit statistical data to BoE.

January 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

PRA Delays Final Direction on Reporting of Private Securitizations

PRA and FCA have delayed the issuance of final direction, including the final template, on reporting of private securitizations, from January 15, 2019 to the end of January 2019.

January 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

SNB Updates Forms on Supervisory Reporting for Banks

SNB published Version 1.7 of reporting forms (AUR_U, AUR_UEA, AUR_UES, AURH_U, AUR_K, AUR_KEA, and AURH_K) and the related documentation for supervisory reporting on an individual and consolidated basis.

January 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

BCBS Finalizes Market Risk Capital Framework and Work Program for 2019

BCBS published the final framework for market risk capital requirements and its work program for 2019. Also published was an explanatory note to provide a non-technical description of the overall market risk framework, the changes that have been incorporated into in this version of the framework and impact of the framework.

January 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: First Update for January 2019

EBA published answers to 13 questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

January 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News

PRA Proposes to Amend Supervisory Statement on Credit Risk Mitigation

PRA published the consultation paper CP1/19 that is proposing changes to the supervisory statement (SS17/13) on credit risk mitigation.

January 10, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2473