HKMA published a report presenting observations from the textual analysis of the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reports of listed firms in Hong Kong. This study applies a wide range of computer-based textual analysis techniques to analyze the annual ESG-related textual disclosure of listed firms since the introduction, in 2016, of the mandatory disclosure requirement by the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong. The findings show that exposure of firms to ESG risks is one important source of uncertainty in their stock valuations and this uncertainty can be reduced effectively by their ESG disclosure. The fact that firms can benefit from being more transparent in ESG issues gives strong support to the continuing efforts of regulators to improve the ESG disclosure of firms.
The report provides a brief overview on the development of the ESG disclosure practice and requirements worldwide. It lays out the textual analysis of ESG reports, presents key observations, and discusses the empirical models and results of the effect of ESG disclosures on the stock valuation of listed firms. ESG funds have been found to be relatively resilient to the market turbulence during the COVID-19 crisis, suggesting that ESG factors significantly differentiate between stock valuations among firms. The key observations to the analysis include the following:
- Length of ESG disclosures have broadly increased since 2016, with firms in sectors more exposed to environmental issues, such as utility and energy, tending to disclose more information.
- Importance of environmental issues increased in ESG disclosures, while social and governance-related disclosures continue to dominate.
- Forward-looking information accounted for an important part of the ESG disclosures.
- Comparability of ESG reports among firms increased over time, while there was little improvement in the readability of reports.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, Securities, ESG, Disclosures, Governance, HKMA
Previous ArticleHKMA Consults on Supervisory Policy for Systemically Important Banks
OSFI has set out the near-term priorities for federally regulated financial institutions and federally regulated private pension plans for the coming months until March 31, 2022.
Under the Italian G20 Presidency, BIS Innovation Hub and the Italian central bank BDI launched the second edition of the G20 TechSprint on the lookout for innovative solutions to resolve operational problems in green and sustainable finance.
EBA proposed the regulatory technical standards on a central database on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) in EU.
ECB published its response to the targeted EC consultation on the review of the bank crisis management and deposit insurance framework in EU.
ACPR published Version 1.0.0 of the RUBA taxonomy, which will come into force from the decree of January 31, 2022.
BCBS, CPMI, and IOSCO (the Committees) are inviting entities that participate in market infrastructures and securities markets through an intermediary as well as non-bank intermediaries to complete voluntary surveys on the use of margin calls.
ECB published Decision 2021/752 to amend Decision 2019/1311 on the third series of targeted longer-term refinancing operations or TLTRO III.
The Central Bank of Ireland published Version 2.7 of the draft credit data template and rules for monthly AnaCredit reporting by banks.
OSFI proposed revisions to the Basel Capital Adequacy Reporting (BCAR) and leverage requirements returns for the 2023 reporting, with the comment period ending on July 09, 2021.
EBA published a discussion paper on review of the standardized nonperforming loans (NPL) transaction data templates, along with the proposed revised NPL data templates.