The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published reports that set out how climate change affects their respective responsibilities and the actions that are being taken in response to it. In its report, FCA set out the steps that have been taken in the industry to mitigate the risks climate change presents and identifies areas, such as retail investments and mortgages, where more needs to be done. The assessment comes within the context of the developing strategic approach to climate change issues.
The FCA report outlines climate change and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) strategy and how it is evolving. It further outlines a timeline of major ESG publications of FCA between now and the Summer of 2022. This includes the publication of final rules on disclosures aligned with the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations for standard listed issuers, asset managers, life insurers, and FCA-regulated pension funds. It also includes work on the Sustainability Disclosure Requirements and product labeling. The report examines how the industry is making commitments to reach net-zero. FCA is also running a further Green Fintech Challenge, focused on new products and services to speed the transition to a net-zero economy. The report is focused on the climate-related risks that financial services firms are exposed to, including insurance underwriting risk, credit risk, financial market risk, and operational risk. The report also outlines the role of capital mobilization in financing both climate change adaptation and climate change mitigation
The PRA report sets out response to the risks posed by climate change to its operations and policy functions in two parts. Part A of the report examines the risks posed by climate change to PRA-regulated firms, the progress they have made in their management of these risks, what the PRA response to these risks has been, and the PRA supervisory strategy from 2022. In 2022, PRA will switch its supervisory approach on the climate-related supervisory expectations from one of assessing implementation to actively supervising against them. While challenges arising from issues such as data gaps persist, firms should use their judgment, expertise, and the tools available to them, to demonstrate understanding and management of the risks posed by climate change to their businesses. This approach will then need to evolve, as industry-wide understanding of climate-related financial risks, data, tools, and best practices continue to develop. As climate change becomes part of the core supervisory approach, firms should expect to demonstrate effective management of climate-related financial risks through regular supervisory engagements and reviews. Where progress is insufficient and assurance or remediation is needed, PRA will request clear plans and, where appropriate, consider exercise of its powers and use of its wider supervisory toolkit.
Part B of the PRA report examines the relationship between climate change and the banking and insurance regulatory capital regimes, whether there are gaps that should be addressed, and the PRA’s planned future work in this space. Capital is a key part of the supervisory and regulatory toolkit of PRA. While PRA observes that it is not the right tool to address the underlying causes of climate change (greenhouse gas emissions), it should help provide resilience against its consequences (financial risks). PRA already expects firms to hold capital against material climate-related financial risks, but in light of the report’s findings, PRA will be undertaking further work. This work will help determine whether changes to the design, use or calibration of the regulatory capital framework may also be needed to ensure resilience against these risks. PRA will provide an update on its approach in 2022 following a call for further research and a conference on climate change and capital requirements.
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Securities, Climate Change Risk, ESG, Climate Change Adaption, Regulatory Capital, PRA, FCA
Next ArticleFSB Chair Updates G20 Leaders Ahead of Rome Summit
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) tool updates for this month include answers to 10 questions.
The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.
The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published a report that summarizes banking conditions in the United States, along with the supervisory and regulatory activities of FED.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on draft regulatory technical standards for the calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts of collective investment undertakings or CIUs, in line with the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) recently completed two pilot initiatives in its 2020-2024 Cyber Security Strategy, which was published in November 2020.