Featured Product

    OFR Paper on a Multifactor Approach to Identifying Systemic Banks

    October 26, 2017

    OFR published a Viewpoint paper examining the use of a multifactor approach to identify the systemically important banks. The paper argues that a multifactor approach is superior to considering size alone in determining systemic importance.

    U.S. bank regulators often use asset-size thresholds, assuming that larger banks pose more risks than smaller banks. An alternative approach, used to identify global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), relies on multiple measures, not just size. Analysis suggests that using such a multifactor approach to identify non-G-SIB U.S. banks for enhanced regulation—one focused on systemic importance—would be an improvement on the asset-size thresholds now used. For large banks that are not G-SIBs, asset-size thresholds are too simplistic to assess systemic importance. For this second tier of banks, a modified version of the G-SIB multifactor approach could help determine the appropriate level of enhanced regulation. European regulators are taking such an approach, a more nuanced way to identify how to subject the banking operations of non-G-SIBs to enhanced standards.

    The paper emphasizes that modifications would be needed to overcome two shortcomings of the multifactor approach. The first shortcoming involves substitutability. The current G-SIB approach may understate the systemic importance of some banks that provide critical services. The regulation establishing extra capital surcharges for U.S. G-SIBs either caps or eliminates substitutability measurements. Although the Basel Committee has proposed some modifications, these changes still do not address the concentration of critical services in a bank that substitutability indicators need to capture. More work on substitutability indicators is needed. The second shortcoming is that the existing multifactor approach may understate the risks posed by the U.S. operations of some foreign G-SIBs. The operations of foreign banks’ U.S. branches and agencies are not required to disclose systemic importance indicators annually on the FED Form Y-15, even though some of these firms’ footprints and operations are significant. Some foreign G-SIBs have U.S. intermediate holding companies and branches, but the combined risks of these operations are considered in only one regulation implementing enhanced prudential standards.

     

    Related Link: Viewpoint Paper (PDF)

    Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, G-SIB, Systemic Risk, Multi-Factor Approach, Viewpoint Paper, OFR

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    SEC Adopts Rules and Amendments Under Regulatory Regime for Swaps

    SEC announced that it took a significant step toward establishing the regulatory regime for security-based swap dealers (SBSDs) by adopting a package of rules and rule amendments under Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act.

    September 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Revises Standard on Margin Rules for Uncleared Derivatives

    APRA revised CPS 226, which is the prudential standard on margin and risk mitigation requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives.

    September 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Formalizes Agreement to Set Up Innovation Hub in Hong Kong SAR

    BIS and HKMA signed the Operational Agreement on the BIS Innovation Hub Center in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR).

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Proposal on Probability of Default and LGD Estimation

    PRA proposed, via the consultation paper CP21/19, an approach to implementing EBA’s recent regulatory products relating to Probability of Default (PD) estimation, Loss Given Default (LGD) estimation, and the treatment of defaulted exposures in the internal ratings-based (IRB) approach to credit risk.

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Issues Consultation on Prudent Person Principle Under Solvency II

    PRA, via the consultation paper CP22/19, has set out its proposed expectations for investment by firms, in accordance with the Prudent Person Principle (PPP).

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    CFTC Extends Comment Period for Proposals on Cross-Border Clearing

    CFTC announced that it is extending, until November 18, 2019, the comment period for the proposal for an alternative compliance framework for derivatives clearing organizations (DCOs) that are organized outside of U.S. and that do not pose substantial risk to the U.S. financial system.

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BNM Publishes Financial Stability Review for the First Half of 2019

    BNM published Financial Stability Review for the first half of 2019.

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Observations from Thematic Review on Recovery Plans of Insurers

    APRA issued a letter to general insurers and life insurers, outlining observations from a recent thematic review on recovery planning by insurers.

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FASB Issues Summary of Tentative Board Decisions at September Meeting

    FASB published a summary of the tentative decisions taken at its Board meeting in September 2019.

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Forms Consultative Expert Group on Digital Ethics in Insurance

    EIOPA established the Consultative Expert Group on Digital Ethics in Insurance to assist EIOPA in the development of digital responsibility principles in insurance.

    September 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3848