Featured Product

    OFR Paper on a Multifactor Approach to Identifying Systemic Banks

    October 26, 2017

    OFR published a Viewpoint paper examining the use of a multifactor approach to identify the systemically important banks. The paper argues that a multifactor approach is superior to considering size alone in determining systemic importance.

    U.S. bank regulators often use asset-size thresholds, assuming that larger banks pose more risks than smaller banks. An alternative approach, used to identify global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), relies on multiple measures, not just size. Analysis suggests that using such a multifactor approach to identify non-G-SIB U.S. banks for enhanced regulation—one focused on systemic importance—would be an improvement on the asset-size thresholds now used. For large banks that are not G-SIBs, asset-size thresholds are too simplistic to assess systemic importance. For this second tier of banks, a modified version of the G-SIB multifactor approach could help determine the appropriate level of enhanced regulation. European regulators are taking such an approach, a more nuanced way to identify how to subject the banking operations of non-G-SIBs to enhanced standards.

    The paper emphasizes that modifications would be needed to overcome two shortcomings of the multifactor approach. The first shortcoming involves substitutability. The current G-SIB approach may understate the systemic importance of some banks that provide critical services. The regulation establishing extra capital surcharges for U.S. G-SIBs either caps or eliminates substitutability measurements. Although the Basel Committee has proposed some modifications, these changes still do not address the concentration of critical services in a bank that substitutability indicators need to capture. More work on substitutability indicators is needed. The second shortcoming is that the existing multifactor approach may understate the risks posed by the U.S. operations of some foreign G-SIBs. The operations of foreign banks’ U.S. branches and agencies are not required to disclose systemic importance indicators annually on the FED Form Y-15, even though some of these firms’ footprints and operations are significant. Some foreign G-SIBs have U.S. intermediate holding companies and branches, but the combined risks of these operations are considered in only one regulation implementing enhanced prudential standards.

     

    Related Link: Viewpoint Paper (PDF)

    Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, G-SIB, Systemic Risk, Multi-Factor Approach, Viewpoint Paper, OFR

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    RBNZ Publishes Financial Stability Report for May 2020

    RBNZ published the financial stability report for May 2020. This review of the financial system in the country highlights that the economic disruption associated with COVID-19 will present challenges to the financial system.

    May 27, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    Regulators and Private Sector Meet to Discuss COVID Policy Responses

    Financial policymakers and international standard-setters met virtually with private-sector executives to discuss international policy responses to COVID-19 pandemic.

    May 26, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Consults on Supervisory Policy for OTC Derivatives Transactions

    HKMA is consulting on revisions to the Supervisory Policy Manual module CR-G-14 on margin and other risk mitigation standards for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions.

    May 25, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Examines Impact of COVID Crisis on Banking Sector in EU

    EBA published thematic note presenting a preliminary assessment of the impact of COVID-19 outbreak on the banking sector in EU.

    May 25, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Clarifies Regulatory Treatment of Measures to Ease COVID Impact

    HKMA published a circular, addressed to authorized institutions, on the application of the Basel Committee guidance on certain COVID-related measures.

    May 25, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA on Regulatory Capital and IFRS 9 Requirements for Payment Holidays

    PRA provided further information on the application of regulatory capital and IFRS 9 requirements to payment holidays granted or extended to address the challenges arising from COVID-19 outbreak.

    May 22, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Finalizes Policy on Supervisory Approach for Insurance SPVs

    PRA published final policy (in PS13/20) setting out the approach and expectations for authorization and supervision of insurance special purpose vehicles (ISPVs or insurance SPVs).

    May 22, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Publishes Version 2.0.1 of Capital+ XBRL Utility

    BoE published version 2.0.1 of the Capital+ XBRL Utility, along with the related release notes.

    May 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA on Fintech Adoption and Innovation by Banks in Hong Kong

    HKMA announced the publication of a report on fintech adoption and innovation in the banking industry in Hong Kong.

    May 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS on Impact of Increasing Use of Cloud Technology on Cyber Risk

    BIS published a working paper that examines the drivers of cyber risk, especially in context of the cloud services.

    May 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 5214